COUNTY COURT

PLEASE NOTE PRINTED ON BOTH SIDES WHERE APPLICABLE

This case 2019/P1/12356 must be heard at the Justices at the CAC

as HHJ Godsmark the architect of this 6 year old fiasco and travesty of Justice also sits as a High Court Judge at Nottingham who the associates at the CAC advocate should hear this appeal, this is quite irrational as he has shown actual bias, abuse of Judicial discretion, abuse of Court power in effect malfeasance to the claimant J K Browne many times over the past 8 years, in effect there is no alternative to a CAC Justices hearing and the CAC has direct jurisdiction, to claim otherwise is the subvert and pervert due process and a definite attempt to prevaricate this matter as if 6 years is not enough? see transcript attached before HHJ Godsmark that is also in the 4 bundles ignored by the CAC as is a list of Judges involved in another case before Godsmark and the judges involved in this matter already presented to the CAC. Please note HHJ Godsmark involved throughout both cases.

The correct procedure is simple, A DDJ, DJ is accountable to a circuit Judge(HHJ) who is accountable to the CAC, and in certain exceptional cases to the High Court that was not involved in the case at any time due to the potential of bias. The CAC/High Court are accountable to the Supreme Court. Primarily all are accountable to their oath of office, their impartiality is imperative as the bedrock of our legal system. Litigants must be able to trust our Judges. Unfortunately the Judges involved in this case have cast all this aside in favour of solidarity with the brotherhood. The HHJs have handed down the case to a DJ Fine. In effect they must be impeached. Otherwise they are a law onto themselves and can no longer be trusted.

Proof: If that is not enough proof of bias there is more, this case started in London, HHJ Godsmark ordered it via DJ Silverman to Nottingham where Godsmark buried it never to be seen again or so he thought! I revived this from under the carpet in Godsmark’s private room in June 2017, see reviving letter, again ignored! Godsmark is devoid of conscious! As a result when this failed he ordered it back to London where it was stalled for a further 3 years. How blatantly biased is that. However if that is not enough proof I now provide further evidence of dishonesty and fraud by Godsmark. On 27th June before Godsmark in his capacity as a High Court Judge the case against me was dismissed and I was awarded costs to be assessed if not agreed. I duly made application for same to SCCO only to be told that this application had been transferred to Nottingham for assessment in order that Godsmark could sit in Judgement on himself, when it got to Nottingham it was again buried under the carpet never to be seen again, such arrogance, I had paid £369 court fee for this assessment that was not refunded regardless of my money claim to Salford for same! This money is still outstanding 5 years later! How biased is that? Copy order enclosed. I now have to conclude that the CAC has joined this conspiracy to deny “access to Justice and Human rights to the claimant J K Browne.

Please confirm that this is not true!!?? Now the CAC sends my 4 bundles back with no order and no transfer order this is a clear attempt to continue the prevarication of HHJs Godsmark, Freeland, Hellman, Saggerson, DJ Fine and Freeland for the second time when he dismisses case no 3YQ10123 dated 01/08/2013 with a wave of his hand and 2 applications from the claimant, my application for a transcript of same is ignored, how biased is that?

These 4 bundles 2019/P1/12356 well within the time limit 18/11/2019, the delay is caused by the CAC as it endeavours to avoid a hearing by very devious means as this is an open and shut case. The bundles will now be returned to the CAC for an adjudication and a CAC order before 3 Lord/Lady Justices in January 2020 to be set down ASAP, the fee of £528 already paid and cashed has not been refunded as at 06/01/2020 over 6 weeks later. Does the CAC intend to misappropriate this money. The CAC must retain the £528 and be used for it’s original purpose to pay for the adjudication hearing and order 2019/P1/12356, this is my inalienable right to “access to Justice” not able to be given or taken away because of being protected by statue, to be set down asap in January 2020.

Attachment: Continuing support for Appellant Notice no 2019/P1/12356.

Appeal to the Civil Appeals Court already submitted number 2019/P1/12356 dated 05/11/2019 against order of HHJ Freeland 18/10.2019 in relation to County Court case no 3YQ10123 dated 01/08/2013, stalled for over 6 years by HHJs Nigel Godsmark (ring leader and chair of the brotherhood and Grand master) Simon Freeland, Stephen Hellman, Alan Saggerson, DJ Ruth Fine and GGH Simon Freeman (for the second time) this is not protocol or due process and an abuse of the process, abuse of judicial discretion and abuse of Court power! Such arrogance is unbelievable! It is not possible to trust them to be impartial! In effect they are dishonest and devoid of conscious, is his endemic?

All of the order of HHJ Simon Freeland (enclosed) be rescinded forthwith, as it is not due process and is an abuse of the process discretion and Court power. As, it is based entirely on discrimination (bias) against the claimant!

Equality Act 2010 violations The Equality Act became law in 2010. It covers everyone in Britain and protects people from discrimination, harassment and victimisation.

Human Rights Act violations, In the determining the civil rights of the claimant in this case the Judges failed to take account of article 6 of the HRA. Everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time, over 6 years is not reasonable no matter what criteria used!

Overriding Objective The overriding objective expressly says that the court has to seek to give effect to it when exercising any powers given by the rules or interpreting any rules. But in every other case, whether using its powers or deciding what the rules mean, the court has to take account of the overriding objective.

Access to Justice 1999 violations: Access to justice is a right not a privilege and as such cannot be interpreted to mean anything else. In that regard it will play an important part in helping to maintain the courts commitment to access to Justice as a right available to all. Lord Dyson Master ot the rolls 11th December 2012. This enables people to exercise their rights, challenge discrimination or hold decision-makers to account..

These Acts of Parliament are ignored by HHJs Simon Freeland, Nigel Graham Godsmark who also sits as a High Court Judge, Stephen Godfrey Hellman, Alan Saggerson, & DJ Ruth Fine and I now appeal to the CAC to adjudicate on this entire matter.

HHJ Freeland and others ignore the evidence of 6 years prevaricating to avoid hearing this open and shut case that included over 80 letters each one requesting a transfer to Nottingham before a JURY and got no reply. My rights are spit on and my money claim to Salford for the refund of the fee £395 received no response, went to a hearing before DDJ Wrigley who negated my claim, and awarded costs. I made application to set aside same only to find that High Court Judge Godsmark now transfers this case and 3YQ10123 back to London with no explanation, needless to say the Wrigley order was upheld by HHJ Dight. No surprise there. The 3YQ10123 was stalled again until 18/10/2019 when HHJ Freeland presided over a kangaroo court where the application of the defendant is given priority and favour, and the claimants application to dismiss the defendants dishonest application ignored and dismissed as usual. And the claimant’s second application to transfer the 3YQ10123 matter to Nottingham before a JURY is dismissed ignored and my fee money £395 stolen by HHJ Freeland, who’s order is riddled with bias in every line and every word and nobody is more aware of this than HHJ Freeland himself. The rule of law is ignored, all equal before the law is ignored, as is the Magna Carta that is still in force. The rule on recusal ignored, HRA 1989, Universal Declaration on human rights 1948 inter alia, ignored. HHJ Freeland ignored all the evidence against the defendant that was overwhelming including over 80 statements of truth that are self-evident and numerous exhibits that were all ignored by biased HHJ Freeland and other HHJs. As a result of this bias I have claimed since 01/08/2013 that I am a victim of corruption by HHJ Godsmark of Nottingham supported by HHJs Hellman, Freeland, Saggerson, DJ Fine and Freeland whose order is proof of bias, now read on for further proof of bias!

The claimant is well aware that there is the possibility of “conflict of interest” in the Lord/Lady Justices. From the start of this case 3YQ10123 01/08/2013 the knifes were out for J K Browne by the Judiciary, in effect they have changed the essence of the case in so far as the title is concerned, it is now “HHJs Godsmark, Hellman, Freeland, Saggerson and Freeland again and DJ Ruth Fine against J K Browne! I can only hope that the Justices will be impartial enough to insure that the Judiciary involved are held to account for this malfeasance. And this appeal be granted with costs. There is no doubt that the claimant has been subjected to discrimination, intimidation and bullying and since 01/08/2013 the date of the initial claim and no hearing to date has been set down.

J K Browne has suffered from the effects of this hostile environment for over 6 years created by these HHJs, and the 80 unanswered letters and the clearly ignored the indisputable evidence against the defendant. How biased is that?

ALL of my 80 letters to Hellman from 01.08.2013 to date contained a request to transfer the entire matter to Nottingham before a Jury, and this was supported by the defendant’s copy letter enclosed. Due to bias, access to justice is not available to me in the County Court. Nottingham is where all the parties involved including my chief witness HHJ Godsmark are based & domiciled. Re my application to transfer the entire matter logically to Nottingham making common sense in terms of a whole day wasted in London to say nothing of traveling expenses compared with just a few hours in Nottingham where the claimant could attend. However as per usual Mr Browne a litigant in person must be penalised victimised demonised by the afore mentioned Judiciary in every way possible by order of HHJ Godsmark who involves himself in every aspect of every case in which I am involved. His obsession is associated with a psychiatric disorder.

 

It must be remembered that the case was correctly in London at the start of this case, but HHJ Godsmark surreptitiously ordered the matter transferred to Nottingham, contrary to my Claim form request for the matter to be heard in London due to bias in Nottingham, he later in an entirely different case hearing touched on the matter 3YQ10123 that was not listed, when advised of same he swept the entire matter under the carpet to avoid a hearing, the case was clear cut, but Mr Browne must not be allowed to win anything by order of HHJ Godsmark. At this point it begs the question, why is HHJ Godsmark involving himself in every aspect of every case in which Mr Browne is a litigant. He appears to be making the issue “personal”. However it gets worse!

Having failed to see me off, he surreptitiously transfers the entire matter back to London for personal reasons and as such this is not protocol or due process no matter what criteria used, but deliberate bias! What else could it be? This is done again surreptitiously with no reference or advisement to the claimant whatsoever? My objection to the hearing in London is also ignored, due to an unnecessary waste of time and expense. The defendant had the right to have the case heard in Nottingham but was ordered to London by HHJ Godsmark to deprive the claimant of “access to Justice” 1999 and his human rights “HRA 1989” and the Equality Act inter alia, to say nothing of the hate campaign run by HHJ Godsmark since 2003. HHJ Freeland totally ignored the “overriding objective” one of which was that costs be kept to a minimum instead of which HHJ Freeland went for the maximum at the request of the defendant. HHJ Freeland had already proved to be biased against the claimant previously so I expected there will be favour and partiality for the defendant and the outcome assured. In effect a kangaroo court. This proved to be true, see the order of partial HHJ Freeland as he tries to hit Mr.Browne with nearly £4000 costs that are disproportionate to say the least and the claimant is not allowed an assessment to question this injustice. How biased is that? Mr Browne must not be allowed to win anything no matter what! The effort, energy and fortitude that these judges put in to see Mr Browne off is criminal to say the least.

It also must be noted that the court fee of £395 for this claim paid on 01.08.13 was for a hearing that was never set down at any time so the fee was returnable, regardless of numerous requests this fee was misappropriated. DDJ Wrigley under instructions from Godsmark lied from the bench as did Godsmark on a previous occasion. Is there no end to the malfeasance and obsessive nature of HHJ Godsmark as he wreaks personal vengeance on Mr Browne.

At this point the discrimination and the malfeasance of all the Judges involved is indefensible. Namely HHJ Godsmark (the chair and grand master of the Brotherhood) the main instigator of this debacle and hate campaign (hate Act) in order to avenge DJ Reeson, explanation later, DDJ Wrigley, HHJ Dight, HHJ Freeland, HHJ Hellman, DJ Fine, HHJ Saggerson and now HHJ Freeland again. This amounts to a misuse of judicial discretion and misuse of Court power, in effect a judicial conspiracy, defrauding the claimant in order for HHJ Godsmark to pursue his personal and most virulent hate campaign against Mr Browne and using the brotherhood solidarity of which he is the chair and grand master, to oblige other Judges to breach their oath of office to support him! They must ignore the “overriding objectives CPR part 1.2”. These are the facts that are indisputable and the named Judges are fully aware of this but they have their instructions and obligations to HHJ Godsmark as the chairman of the brotherhood and Grand Master.

I now proceed to the chronology of this matter

1) Claim made in Salford County Court money claim centre on 01/08/2013 with instruction for a London hearing, due to discrimination experienced and proved in Nottingham before HHJ Godsmark.

2) Matter transferred to Northampton before DDJ Freeman who duly transfers the case correctly to London

3) London DJ Silverman processes this claim in the normal way for some time until unbelievably

4) HHJ Godsmark Nottingham applies to Silverman London to have the case transferred to Nottingham this was done surreptitiously without reference to the claimant, not protocol. Misuse judicial discretion and court power leaving J K Browne at the mercy of Biased HHJ Godsmark and that was quick in coming. Rights denied!

5) I write letters to Silverman objecting to this transfer as it is not due process! As it denies the claimant of his rights, that are ignored, it appears I am not to get “access to Justice 1999”

6) The matter is now in Nottingham before HHJ Godsmark and there is nothing I can do, on 06/08/14 bias HHJ Godsmark touches on this case 3YQ10123 that was not listed, in an entirely different matter. When advised HHJ Godsmark of this fact he swept the entire matter under the carpet never to be seen again, or so he thought!

7) I reinstate the case 3YQ10123 in a letter to Godsmark and request a hearing of the matter before a JURY to resolve the matter. This letter is ignored as usual. Clearly, I am “persona non grata” before HHJ Godsmark as he is clearly obsessed to the point of paranoia as he pursues this vendetta against the Claimant on behalf DJ Reeson a fellow member of the brotherhood

8) As a result of Godsmark’s intransigence by ignoring the evidence and sweeping it under the carpet and leaving me in limbo I decide to issue a money claim to Salford for the return of the £395 court fee for 3YQ10123 01.08.13 that was never heard or adjudicated on, and no order issued and just swept under the carpet of HHJ Godsmark bench and as such I was at least entitled to a refund.

9) This caused an implausible reaction from the Court as it refuting my claim and issued a devious defence. This resulted in a hearing before DDJ Wrigley who rejected my claim by saying that this had nothing to do with HHJ Godsmark, clearly it had everything to do with Godsmark, clearly DDJ Wrigley as a junior Judge was taking his instructions from Godsmark. During this so called hearing DDJ Wrigley referred to DJ Reeson, unprompted, as a much respected Judge in the Nottingham Brotherhood where HHJ Godsmark is chair and grand-master. The order is an exhibit.

10) This left me with no choice so I made an application to Nottingham to set Wrigley’s order aside with justifiable grounds. Now for the big surprise of all! Unbelievably

11) There is an order from Godsmark transferring the substantive significate case 3YQ10123 dated 01.08.2013 and the setting aside of the order of Wrigley back to London. Godsmark is using his status to divert the matter away from himself by any means at his disposal as the HHJ Godsmark is devoid of conscious, integrity and common decency! This was done surreptitiously as usual! I was never consulted and was presented with a fait accompli as usual. This is not due process it is abuse of the process by a HHJ who is operating a personal vengeance against Mr Browne on behalf of DJ Reeson.

12) Now the matter is incredible back in London and there is nothing I can do except keep fighting for JUSTICE before an honest and impartial Judge if I can find one. What next I ask myself, the matter is now 5 years old and no resolution in sight. On 05/10/2018 HHJ Hellman makes an order that there will be a CCMC arranged before HHJ Freeland after 28 days.

13) On the 22/10/18 a hearing is set down for 2pm 01/02/19 this hearing was cancelled as without merit on the Courts own volition, without any notice to me and my costs were refused. This is a travesty of justice

14) Now I have an order from DJ Fine 09/05/19 stating that the application of the defendant, this is the first time I was made aware of any application, Is this some kind of ambush by a consortium of Judges to deprive the claimant of his rights to a fair trial before an impartial Judge within a reasonable time as per the HRA provisions. This hearing did not take place either. How biased is that?

15) Now the so called solicitor for the defendant issues an application to cancel the substantive significant case 3YQ10123 dated 01/08/2013 that has never been heard or set down for a hearing. Just swept under the carpet in HHJ Godsmark bench. This is quite absurd and there is no justification or evidence for this application is to be ignored or does this man know something I do not, i.e. the biased Judge has decided to advise the defendant that he will find for him regardless (in effect a kangaroo court). The overwhelming evidence and over 80 letters and exhibits including the Claim form dated 01/08/2013 and requests for Judgment will be ignored by order of HHJ Freeland. The Judges ignore the lot as usual!

16) I decide to issue an application refuting this attempt to pervert the course of Justice, ignored as usual. The order confirms that my application was ignored upon receipt. Three copies were sent to the court as required; one sealed copy must be returned to me, this did not happen and my court fee of £255 was misappropriated. So protocol was ignored again to deprive Mr Browne of his rights to be advised of this wrong doing.

The first I knew that the Court had received my application was the order of HHJ Hellman 13/06/2019 and my cheque dated 21/05/2019 for the fee was cashed on 24/05/19. No further communication was received from the Court.

17) I was now aware that an ambush was planned and I was heading to a kangaroo court as per usual. I now issue a further application in order to try and stop this injustice. I requested a transfer of the entire matter to Nottingham before a JURY as I had repeated in every one of my 80 letters since 01/08/2013 all of which were ignored with no explaination. This application dated 26/06/19 fee paid £255 cheque no 133 cashed 29/06/19 had 3 copies as required and one sealed copy was returned to me. My bank statements confirm that my cheques for these fees were cashed.

18) Now I have an order from HHJ Hellman and I quote “Take note that the application (singular) will take place on” 18.10.19. Please note it does not mention which application, was it the defendants only that would have not surprised me, as there were three but the claimant was not advised. How biased is that!

19) I wrote a letter to Hellman asking for clarification as to which application is to be heard on 18/10/19. No reply was received as usual. My assessment of this dereliction of normal behaviour convinced me that I was to be ignored no matter what and a kangaroo court was set for the 18.10.19 so the outcome would be the same whether I attended or not.

20) On the 15/08/19 I received a further order this time from HHJ Saggerson, this order is deliberately vague with intent to deceive “it is ordered that “list all outstanding application(singular)18/10/19” and sealed. What is it possible to deduce from such an order. The list of applications are or should be already on file but the claimant must not be informed. How is that for Bias!

21) Now the court drops in another Judge HHJ Freeland for the second time, who has been shown as biased and partial previously is now selected to see Mr Browne off with summarily assessed costs with no opportunity to challenge, again par for the course. Had the matter been heard in Nottingham the costs would be 26% of the costs awarded. So this is contrary to the provisions of the “Overriding Objective” to keep costs to a minimum inter alia. I have applied to Freeland for permission to appeal and got no reply, no surprise there. I can only hope that this conspiracy is confined to the lower courts and the Lord/Lady Justices are above this kind of stratagem and can be relied on for an impartial adjudication and a subsequent order for same in due course.

22) Before proceeding on to the biased order itself I made the following comment:

Comment: We expect our judges to be Honourable Principled Moral Ethical honest and wise and above all impartial. Their integrity and impartiality are the bedrock of the entire judicial system. We trust them to ensure fair trials and protect the rights of all litigants’. We expect them to peruse the evidence and purely on the evidence to make a fair Judgment. We expect them to respect fundamental basic Human Rights, ECHR, and HRA, Create a level playing field. To treat litigants in person as described in the “Hand Book for litigants in Person co-written by two of the offending judges in this matter. HHJ Hampton & HHJ Peter Bower. I know I am the victim of corrupt judges in the County Court at Nottingham and Central Court at London. I am confident I can prove this to be the case before impartial Justices at the CAC or a Jury at Nottingham. End of comment.

23) I now come to the order of HHJ Freeland who is sitting on an interlocutory application and substituting it for the substantive significant and crucial case number 3YQ10123 dated 01/08/2013 over 6 years old and now diverts it into an interlocutory application by the defendant, at the same time he dismisses my 2 applications at a cost of £510 as if they did not exist. How biased is that! In effect he did the same as HHJ Godsmark did on 06/08/2014 in an effort to see Mr Browne off. How biased is that!

24) Part one of said order states that the defendants bundle was sent on the 11/10/19 this is as maybe however I did not receive this until midday on 17/10/19. Regardless of this I am expected to respond to this false witness in a day or even a couple of days. All ignored by HHJ Freeland.

25) Part two of the order claims that HHJ Saggerson directed that all applications were to be heard on 18/10/2019. I have no hesitation in accusing HHJ Freeland of blatant lying. I have the order of Saggerson to prove it. In effect the plural was not used at any time on any order. How biased is that?

26) HHJ Freeland only reads the defendants bundle and ignored the 80 plus letters sent to Hellman by Fax, email and Royal Mail recording delivery requesting transfer to Nottingham before a Jury due to bias shown by HHJs Godsmark, Hellman, Freeland, Saggerson Fine and again Freeland that included indisputable evidence over a 6 year period including the claim form itself and subsequent requests for Judgement as the defendant did not comply with the due process, all ignored by Salford who has now joined the conspiracy. How is that for bias! Due to this I know it would not have made any difference whether I attended this hearing or not as this was a kangaroo court and the outcome was predictable!.

27) Now it is ordered.

  1. Unbelievable Staples invokes the Human rights act. He deliberately avoids article 6, 7, inter alia that states I am entitled to a trial before an impartial Judge within a reasonable time, it is six years since my claim 01/08/2013 and still not set down for a substantive hearing even yet before a Jury due to discrimination chicanery sophistry and every other devise these Judges can come up with to see Mr Browne off and his money stolen by perverting the course of Justice
  2. The length of time is over 6 years stalled by the Judges not the claimant. But the fact that he claims partiality from HHJ Freeland comes as no surprise. How is that for bias?
  3. This is further proof that my 6 years old claim has never been heard, regardless of the biased current bogus order of HHJ Freeland

28) I now claim bias against all the Judges involved in this 3YQ10123 and HHJ Freeland and the other Judges involved must withdraw themselves, and instigate a Jury trial in Nottingham without any further delay. This is my wish to the Justices of the CAC, the HHJs fear such a hearing as they have used subterfuge chicanery sophistry to avoid same due to the solidarity of the brotherhood. How biased is that!

29) I now come to the exhibits that are indisputable. Case no 3YQ10123

  1. Appellants Notice
  2. Continuing support for appellants notice
  3. Copy of original claim form dated 01/08/2013 for compensation for police brutality, it also contained instructions that the hearing be in London due to bias in Nottingham.
  4. Grounds for making this claim in a comprehensive report on the assault by the police on Mr Browne that involved the illegal use of CS totally unnecessary and uncalled for!
  5. List of 3 police officers involved in this assault. Causing post dramatic stress disorder to Mr Browne. PLUS 8 officers involved in the closing of ranks and the lies they invented. There are photos of my injuries and 2 doctor’s reports. HHJ Freeland was fully aware of all these facts but he decided to ignore the lot. How biased is that?
  6. Request for Judgement (ignored) due to no response of any kind from the defendant to this legitimate official money claim. How biased is that?
  7. There is at least 80 letters to Hellman (transfer to Nottingham before a Jury) all ignored. However I will only submit 3 lots total 7 pages in hard copy printed on both sides, for the environment. The rest will be on disc should the Lord/Lady Justices require the lot. These letters are statements of truth and nothing but the truth so help me! All ignored as if due process does not apply to HM’s Judges. How biased is that? I remind the current 6 HHJs of the Magna Carta principles that everyone is subject to the law even the judiciary and guarantees the rights of individuals the right to justice and the right to a fair trial. Clearly this does not apply to HHJs as they wreak vengeances on Mr Browne
  8. Letter to Hellman seeking clarification ignored as usual no surprise there. I must be kept out of my own case at the behest of Hellman! Ignored, bias
  9. ***Copy of letter from defendant’s agent page 2&1 agreeing that the case be heard in Nottingham. “there is no good reason to take this case to London” he also agrees a jury trial is right “Is a jury in London any more or less biased against the police than one in Nottingham” HHJ Freeland ignores this and all evidence the shows his judgment is bogus.
  10. ***Copy orders a hearing 01/02/2019 that never took place, claimant not informed, no costs awarded. How biased is that?

***Copy order of DJ Fine dated 09/05/19. The application (singular) be listed etc. before a HHJ to be advised. How biased is that?

***Copy order of HHJ Hellman 13/06/2019 listing two applications to be heard together. No hearing set down. Case almost 6 Years old. How biased is that?

***Copy order dated 25/06/2019 “Take notice the application (singular) hearing will take place on 18/10/19. Preceded by letter dated12/07/19 from the court

***Now another HHJ dropped in: Copy order of HHJ Saggerson 15/08/2019 “List all outstanding application (singular) 18/10/2019. What am I to make of this? How is that for bias. See letter asking for clarification

  1. ***Copy of the order of HHJ Freeland 18/10/2019 that is clearly bogus, the subject of this appeal to the CAC. This was the result of over 6 years judicial stalling as no HHJ was prepared to hear this substantive case and this order is discrimination and bias in no uncertain terms in the hope the claimant will give up and let these Judges steal my money. Already costing Mr Browne the claimant over £6345 in fees alone. All stolen by HMCT service. Designed to get the claimant to give up to avoid a hearing of the matter. How biased is that?
  2. Copy of the claimant’s application to dismiss the defendant’s application to set aside the substantive claim 3YQ10123 that is 6 years old and never been set down or heard even now @ a fee of £255. How biased is that?
  3. Copy of the claimant’s application to transfer the entire matter to Nottingham before a Jury @ a fee of £255. This would be the obvious right thing to do in the circumstances. How is that for extreme bias.
  4. This would put the blame where it rightly belongs and Justice would be done by a Jury. The writer knows right from wrong and this order is wrong and HHJ Freeland knows it, but he chooses to lie to protect HHJ Godsmark
  5. Now another group of orders Copy order of DDJ Freeman transferring 3YQ10123 matter to Central London County Court. Copy order of DJ Silverman transferring the matter to Nottingham. Copy order of HHJ Godsmark transferring it back to Central London County Court. How is that for delaying tactics! Pure and simple Bias as this case must never be heard as it involves HHJ Godsmark in Malfeasance and conspiracy. As he has used his status to avoid a hearing and kept my money fee of £395 for 6 years plus. How biased is that?
  6. ***Pages 5/6 of transcript before HHJ Godsmark at non listed matter, and matter swept under the carpet. How biased is that?
  7. Copy of the listings for that day. No listing for 3YQ10123
  8. This is damning no matter what criteria used and is indisputable proof of discrimination (bias) and a complete denial of “Access to Justice” “HRA”, “Equality Act” inter alia! How biased is that!
  9. Letter to Godsmark reinstating 3YQ10123 very dusty from under the carpet where devoid of conscious HHJ Godsmark placed it months previously to avoid a hearing. Ignored as usual. No hearing took place at any time regardless!
  10. This matter 3YQ10123 started as a mere money claim in Salford, then to Northampton DDJ Freeman (copy) then to London before DJ Silverman(copy) then to Nottingham HHJ Godsmark (copy) letter to Silverman objecting to Nottingham transfer ignored as usual, then to DDJ Wrigley (copy)Nottingham. Order by Godsmark transferring the Wrigley matter back to London(copy) then to HHJ Dight(copy) then to Hellman(copy) London then to Freeland(copy) then to DJ Fine(copy) then to Saggerson(copy) then back to Freeland (copy) where his order endeavours to sweeping the entire matter under the carpet official, copying HHJ Godsmark on 06/08/2014. This is due process according to HHJ Godsmark & now by HHJ Freeland, how biased is that
  11. Three orders involved in this debarcle that are bizarre to say the least. Salford to Northampton where DDJ Freeman orders it to London, London DJ Silverman orders it to Nottingham, HHJ Godsmark orders it back to London. All these transfers were done without any reference to the claimant whatsoever. How biased is that?
  12. Letter to Godsmark recovering the 3YQ10123 matter from under the carpet on the floor of Godsmark’s bench where Godsmark swept it on 06/08/2014. His explanation is absurd, the matter was never listed and nobody knows this better than Godsmark, as he continues his vendetta against J K Browne
  13. Letter to London court dated 28/09/2013 ignored again, this is not due process. How is that for bias?
  14. Letter to defendant dated 16/02/2014. Ignored with impunity. No surprise there. All my letters over 6 years are ignored. Justice is not available to me and my human rights are spit on by our esteemed Judiciary!
  15. Letter to defendant16/03/2012
  16. Bias definition

I now require a hearing before 3 Lord/Lady Justices that I will attend regardless of my problem getting there. As this case is over 6 years old there was a lot more statements and exhibits. Should there be any further questions that the CAC would like to ask, they should not hesitate to contract the undersigned. The writer is fully aware that there might be a conflict of interest before the Honourable Lord/Lady Justices and they might not want to hear this case, this been the case would the CAC send back the bundles and importantly my £528 court fee, that is still retained by the CAC, and I will see exactly what I need to do next.

The undersigned is fully aware of the repetitive

nature of this narrative however this is necessary due to the seriousness of the case and the involvement of HHJs of the brotherhood and that means the CAC may have a conflict of interest that their oath of office requires them to ignore as they are duty bound to be impartial. The bundles will be returned to the CAC w/c 06/01/2020. All the above is proved in the 4 authenticated bundles

Signed…………………………………………….05/11/2019

John Kenneth Browne

When responding, please give PAGE NUMBER & Line number.

Please note that this is a very serious matter and involves the honesty and integrity of our Judiciary, as such must be dealt with by the law Lords as they are impartial Justices at the CAC.

I make no apologies for the repetition in this narrative as 10 years is a long time to be fighting for justice in our courts, and it requires constant repetition to get “Access to Justice” and stop the deliberate prevarication that has lasted over 6 years in this case alone.

I now rely on the honesty, integrity and the impartially of our senior Judges in the Civil Appeals Court. Unfortunately the solidarity of the brotherhood may result in malfeasance. In this circumstance what will the Justices decide? May I please have an order from the Justices in order to move this matter forward to a conclusion?

J K Browne

Attached: Four 4 exhibits that proves Judicial Bias and an abuse of the process by the very people who are paid and sworn to uphold.

  1. Transcript of unlisted hearing before HHJ Godsmark, when 3YQ10123 is swept under the carpet in Godsmark’s room never to be seen again and my £395 in effect stolen.
  2. Actual listing for that day. No mention of 3YQ10123
  3. Order of Godsmark in the High Court that registry at CAC want me to appeal to, this is bias itself by the CAC.
  4. List of Judges involved in this debarcle presided over by HHJ Godsmark. In the previous case, a mere money claim, J K Browne is hit with over £100,000 costs by guess who, HHJ Godsmark who is clearly obsessed with vengeance against Mr Browne to the point of paranoid

PLEASE NOTE PRINTED ON BOTH SIDES WHERE APPLICABLE

This case 2019/P1/12356 must be heard at the Justices at the CAC

as HHJ Godsmark the architect of this 6 year old fiasco and travesty of Justice also sits as a High Court Judge at Nottingham who the associates at the CAC advocate should hear this appeal, this is quite irrational as he has shown actual bias, abuse of Judicial discretion, abuse of Court power in effect malfeasance to the claimant J K Browne many times over the past 8 years, in effect there is no alternative to a CAC Justices hearing and the CAC has direct jurisdiction, to claim otherwise is the subvert and pervert due process and a definite attempt to prevaricate this matter as if 6 years is not enough? see transcript attached before HHJ Godsmark that is also in the 4 bundles ignored by the CAC as is a list of Judges involved in another case before Godsmark and the judges involved in this matter already presented to the CAC. Please note HHJ Godsmark involved throughout both cases.

The correct procedure is simple, A DDJ, DJ is accountable to a circuit Judge(HHJ) who is accountable to the CAC, and in certain exceptional cases to the High Court that was not involved in the case at any time due to the potential of bias. The CAC/High Court are accountable to the Supreme Court. Primarily all are accountable to their oath of office, their impartiality is imperative as the bedrock of our legal system. Litigants must be able to trust our Judges. Unfortunately the Judges involved in this case have cast all this aside in favour of solidarity with the brotherhood. The HHJs have handed down the case to a DJ Fine. In effect they must be impeached. Otherwise they are a law onto themselves and can no longer be trusted.

Proof: If that is not enough proof of bias there is more, this case started in London, HHJ Godsmark ordered it via DJ Silverman to Nottingham where Godsmark buried it never to be seen again or so he thought! I revived this from under the carpet in Godsmark’s private room in June 2017, see reviving letter, again ignored! Godsmark is devoid of conscious! As a result when this failed he ordered it back to London where it was stalled for a further 3 years. How blatantly biased is that. However if that is not enough proof I now provide further evidence of dishonesty and fraud by Godsmark. On 27th June before Godsmark in his capacity as a High Court Judge the case against me was dismissed and I was awarded costs to be assessed if not agreed. I duly made application for same to SCCO only to be told that this application had been transferred to Nottingham for assessment in order that Godsmark could sit in Judgement on himself, when it got to Nottingham it was again buried under the carpet never to be seen again, such arrogance, I had paid £369 court fee for this assessment that was not refunded regardless of my money claim to Salford for same! This money is still outstanding 5 years later! How biased is that? Copy order enclosed. I now have to conclude that the CAC has joined this conspiracy to deny “access to Justice and Human rights to the claimant J K Browne.

Please confirm that this is not true!!?? Now the CAC sends my 4 bundles back with no order and no transfer order this is a clear attempt to continue the prevarication of HHJs Godsmark, Freeland, Hellman, Saggerson, DJ Fine and Freeland for the second time when he dismisses case no 3YQ10123 dated 01/08/2013 with a wave of his hand and 2 applications from the claimant, my application for a transcript of same is ignored, how biased is that?

These 4 bundles 2019/P1/12356 well within the time limit 18/11/2019, the delay is caused by the CAC as it endeavours to avoid a hearing by very devious means as this is an open and shut case. The bundles will now be returned to the CAC for an adjudication and a CAC order before 3 Lord/Lady Justices in January 2020 to be set down ASAP, the fee of £528 already paid and cashed has not been refunded as at 06/01/2020 over 6 weeks later. Does the CAC intend to misappropriate this money. The CAC must retain the £528 and be used for it’s original purpose to pay for the adjudication hearing and order 2019/P1/12356, this is my inalienable right to “access to Justice” not able to be given or taken away because of being protected by statue, to be set down asap in January 2020.

Attachment: Continuing support for Appellant Notice no 2019/P1/12356.

Appeal to the Civil Appeals Court already submitted number 2019/P1/12356 dated 05/11/2019 against order of HHJ Freeland 18/10.2019 in relation to County Court case no 3YQ10123 dated 01/08/2013, stalled for over 6 years by HHJs Nigel Godsmark (ring leader and chair of the brotherhood and Grand master) Simon Freeland, Stephen Hellman, Alan Saggerson, DJ Ruth Fine and GGH Simon Freeman (for the second time) this is not protocol or due process and an abuse of the process, abuse of judicial discretion and abuse of Court power! Such arrogance is unbelievable! It is not possible to trust them to be impartial! In effect they are dishonest and devoid of conscious, is his endemic?

All of the order of HHJ Simon Freeland (enclosed) be rescinded forthwith, as it is not due process and is an abuse of the process discretion and Court power. As, it is based entirely on discrimination (bias) against the claimant!

Equality Act 2010 violations The Equality Act became law in 2010. It covers everyone in Britain and protects people from discrimination, harassment and victimisation.

Human Rights Act violations, In the determining the civil rights of the claimant in this case the Judges failed to take account of article 6 of the HRA. Everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time, over 6 years is not reasonable no matter what criteria used!

Overriding Objective The overriding objective expressly says that the court has to seek to give effect to it when exercising any powers given by the rules or interpreting any rules. But in every other case, whether using its powers or deciding what the rules mean, the court has to take account of the overriding objective.

Access to Justice 1999 violations: Access to justice is a right not a privilege and as such cannot be interpreted to mean anything else. In that regard it will play an important part in helping to maintain the courts commitment to access to Justice as a right available to all. Lord Dyson Master ot the rolls 11th December 2012. This enables people to exercise their rights, challenge discrimination or hold decision-makers to account..

These Acts of Parliament are ignored by HHJs Simon Freeland, Nigel Graham Godsmark who also sits as a High Court Judge, Stephen Godfrey Hellman, Alan Saggerson, & DJ Ruth Fine and I now appeal to the CAC to adjudicate on this entire matter.

HHJ Freeland and others ignore the evidence of 6 years prevaricating to avoid hearing this open and shut case that included over 80 letters each one requesting a transfer to Nottingham before a JURY and got no reply. My rights are spit on and my money claim to Salford for the refund of the fee £395 received no response, went to a hearing before DDJ Wrigley who negated my claim, and awarded costs. I made application to set aside same only to find that High Court Judge Godsmark now transfers this case and 3YQ10123 back to London with no explanation, needless to say the Wrigley order was upheld by HHJ Dight. No surprise there. The 3YQ10123 was stalled again until 18/10/2019 when HHJ Freeland presided over a kangaroo court where the application of the defendant is given priority and favour, and the claimants application to dismiss the defendants dishonest application ignored and dismissed as usual. And the claimant’s second application to transfer the 3YQ10123 matter to Nottingham before a JURY is dismissed ignored and my fee money £395 stolen by HHJ Freeland, who’s order is riddled with bias in every line and every word and nobody is more aware of this than HHJ Freeland himself. The rule of law is ignored, all equal before the law is ignored, as is the Magna Carta that is still in force. The rule on recusal ignored, HRA 1989, Universal Declaration on human rights 1948 inter alia, ignored. HHJ Freeland ignored all the evidence against the defendant that was overwhelming including over 80 statements of truth that are self-evident and numerous exhibits that were all ignored by biased HHJ Freeland and other HHJs. As a result of this bias I have claimed since 01/08/2013 that I am a victim of corruption by HHJ Godsmark of Nottingham supported by HHJs Hellman, Freeland, Saggerson, DJ Fine and Freeland whose order is proof of bias, now read on for further proof of bias!

The claimant is well aware that there is the possibility of “conflict of interest” in the Lord/Lady Justices. From the start of this case 3YQ10123 01/08/2013 the knifes were out for J K Browne by the Judiciary, in effect they have changed the essence of the case in so far as the title is concerned, it is now “HHJs Godsmark, Hellman, Freeland, Saggerson and Freeland again and DJ Ruth Fine against J K Browne! I can only hope that the Justices will be impartial enough to insure that the Judiciary involved are held to account for this malfeasance. And this appeal be granted with costs. There is no doubt that the claimant has been subjected to discrimination, intimidation and bullying and since 01/08/2013 the date of the initial claim and no hearing to date has been set down.

J K Browne has suffered from the effects of this hostile environment for over 6 years created by these HHJs, and the 80 unanswered letters and the clearly ignored the indisputable evidence against the defendant. How biased is that?

ALL of my 80 letters to Hellman from 01.08.2013 to date contained a request to transfer the entire matter to Nottingham before a Jury, and this was supported by the defendant’s copy letter enclosed. Due to bias, access to justice is not available to me in the County Court. Nottingham is where all the parties involved including my chief witness HHJ Godsmark are based & domiciled. Re my application to transfer the entire matter logically to Nottingham making common sense in terms of a whole day wasted in London to say nothing of traveling expenses compared with just a few hours in Nottingham where the claimant could attend. However as per usual Mr Browne a litigant in person must be penalised victimised demonised by the afore mentioned Judiciary in every way possible by order of HHJ Godsmark who involves himself in every aspect of every case in which I am involved. His obsession is associated with a psychiatric disorder.

 

It must be remembered that the case was correctly in London at the start of this case, but HHJ Godsmark surreptitiously ordered the matter transferred to Nottingham, contrary to my Claim form request for the matter to be heard in London due to bias in Nottingham, he later in an entirely different case hearing touched on the matter 3YQ10123 that was not listed, when advised of same he swept the entire matter under the carpet to avoid a hearing, the case was clear cut, but Mr Browne must not be allowed to win anything by order of HHJ Godsmark. At this point it begs the question, why is HHJ Godsmark involving himself in every aspect of every case in which Mr Browne is a litigant. He appears to be making the issue “personal”. However it gets worse!

Having failed to see me off, he surreptitiously transfers the entire matter back to London for personal reasons and as such this is not protocol or due process no matter what criteria used, but deliberate bias! What else could it be? This is done again surreptitiously with no reference or advisement to the claimant whatsoever? My objection to the hearing in London is also ignored, due to an unnecessary waste of time and expense. The defendant had the right to have the case heard in Nottingham but was ordered to London by HHJ Godsmark to deprive the claimant of “access to Justice” 1999 and his human rights “HRA 1989” and the Equality Act inter alia, to say nothing of the hate campaign run by HHJ Godsmark since 2003. HHJ Freeland totally ignored the “overriding objective” one of which was that costs be kept to a minimum instead of which HHJ Freeland went for the maximum at the request of the defendant. HHJ Freeland had already proved to be biased against the claimant previously so I expected there will be favour and partiality for the defendant and the outcome assured. In effect a kangaroo court. This proved to be true, see the order of partial HHJ Freeland as he tries to hit Mr.Browne with nearly £4000 costs that are disproportionate to say the least and the claimant is not allowed an assessment to question this injustice. How biased is that? Mr Browne must not be allowed to win anything no matter what! The effort, energy and fortitude that these judges put in to see Mr Browne off is criminal to say the least.

It also must be noted that the court fee of £395 for this claim paid on 01.08.13 was for a hearing that was never set down at any time so the fee was returnable, regardless of numerous requests this fee was misappropriated. DDJ Wrigley under instructions from Godsmark lied from the bench as did Godsmark on a previous occasion. Is there no end to the malfeasance and obsessive nature of HHJ Godsmark as he wreaks personal vengeance on Mr Browne.

At this point the discrimination and the malfeasance of all the Judges involved is indefensible. Namely HHJ Godsmark (the chair and grand master of the Brotherhood) the main instigator of this debacle and hate campaign (hate Act) in order to avenge DJ Reeson, explanation later, DDJ Wrigley, HHJ Dight, HHJ Freeland, HHJ Hellman, DJ Fine, HHJ Saggerson and now HHJ Freeland again. This amounts to a misuse of judicial discretion and misuse of Court power, in effect a judicial conspiracy, defrauding the claimant in order for HHJ Godsmark to pursue his personal and most virulent hate campaign against Mr Browne and using the brotherhood solidarity of which he is the chair and grand master, to oblige other Judges to breach their oath of office to support him! They must ignore the “overriding objectives CPR part 1.2”. These are the facts that are indisputable and the named Judges are fully aware of this but they have their instructions and obligations to HHJ Godsmark as the chairman of the brotherhood and Grand Master.

I now proceed to the chronology of this matter

1) Claim made in Salford County Court money claim centre on 01/08/2013 with instruction for a London hearing, due to discrimination experienced and proved in Nottingham before HHJ Godsmark.

2) Matter transferred to Northampton before DDJ Freeman who duly transfers the case correctly to London

3) London DJ Silverman processes this claim in the normal way for some time until unbelievably

4) HHJ Godsmark Nottingham applies to Silverman London to have the case transferred to Nottingham this was done surreptitiously without reference to the claimant, not protocol. Misuse judicial discretion and court power leaving J K Browne at the mercy of Biased HHJ Godsmark and that was quick in coming. Rights denied!

5) I write letters to Silverman objecting to this transfer as it is not due process! As it denies the claimant of his rights, that are ignored, it appears I am not to get “access to Justice 1999”

6) The matter is now in Nottingham before HHJ Godsmark and there is nothing I can do, on 06/08/14 bias HHJ Godsmark touches on this case 3YQ10123 that was not listed, in an entirely different matter. When advised HHJ Godsmark of this fact he swept the entire matter under the carpet never to be seen again, or so he thought!

7) I reinstate the case 3YQ10123 in a letter to Godsmark and request a hearing of the matter before a JURY to resolve the matter. This letter is ignored as usual. Clearly, I am “persona non grata” before HHJ Godsmark as he is clearly obsessed to the point of paranoia as he pursues this vendetta against the Claimant on behalf DJ Reeson a fellow member of the brotherhood

8) As a result of Godsmark’s intransigence by ignoring the evidence and sweeping it under the carpet and leaving me in limbo I decide to issue a money claim to Salford for the return of the £395 court fee for 3YQ10123 01.08.13 that was never heard or adjudicated on, and no order issued and just swept under the carpet of HHJ Godsmark bench and as such I was at least entitled to a refund.

9) This caused an implausible reaction from the Court as it refuting my claim and issued a devious defence. This resulted in a hearing before DDJ Wrigley who rejected my claim by saying that this had nothing to do with HHJ Godsmark, clearly it had everything to do with Godsmark, clearly DDJ Wrigley as a junior Judge was taking his instructions from Godsmark. During this so called hearing DDJ Wrigley referred to DJ Reeson, unprompted, as a much respected Judge in the Nottingham Brotherhood where HHJ Godsmark is chair and grand-master. The order is an exhibit.

10) This left me with no choice so I made an application to Nottingham to set Wrigley’s order aside with justifiable grounds. Now for the big surprise of all! Unbelievably

11) There is an order from Godsmark transferring the substantive significate case 3YQ10123 dated 01.08.2013 and the setting aside of the order of Wrigley back to London. Godsmark is using his status to divert the matter away from himself by any means at his disposal as the HHJ Godsmark is devoid of conscious, integrity and common decency! This was done surreptitiously as usual! I was never consulted and was presented with a fait accompli as usual. This is not due process it is abuse of the process by a HHJ who is operating a personal vengeance against Mr Browne on behalf of DJ Reeson.

12) Now the matter is incredible back in London and there is nothing I can do except keep fighting for JUSTICE before an honest and impartial Judge if I can find one. What next I ask myself, the matter is now 5 years old and no resolution in sight. On 05/10/2018 HHJ Hellman makes an order that there will be a CCMC arranged before HHJ Freeland after 28 days.

13) On the 22/10/18 a hearing is set down for 2pm 01/02/19 this hearing was cancelled as without merit on the Courts own volition, without any notice to me and my costs were refused. This is a travesty of justice

14) Now I have an order from DJ Fine 09/05/19 stating that the application of the defendant, this is the first time I was made aware of any application, Is this some kind of ambush by a consortium of Judges to deprive the claimant of his rights to a fair trial before an impartial Judge within a reasonable time as per the HRA provisions. This hearing did not take place either. How biased is that?

15) Now the so called solicitor for the defendant issues an application to cancel the substantive significant case 3YQ10123 dated 01/08/2013 that has never been heard or set down for a hearing. Just swept under the carpet in HHJ Godsmark bench. This is quite absurd and there is no justification or evidence for this application is to be ignored or does this man know something I do not, i.e. the biased Judge has decided to advise the defendant that he will find for him regardless (in effect a kangaroo court). The overwhelming evidence and over 80 letters and exhibits including the Claim form dated 01/08/2013 and requests for Judgment will be ignored by order of HHJ Freeland. The Judges ignore the lot as usual!

16) I decide to issue an application refuting this attempt to pervert the course of Justice, ignored as usual. The order confirms that my application was ignored upon receipt. Three copies were sent to the court as required; one sealed copy must be returned to me, this did not happen and my court fee of £255 was misappropriated. So protocol was ignored again to deprive Mr Browne of his rights to be advised of this wrong doing.

The first I knew that the Court had received my application was the order of HHJ Hellman 13/06/2019 and my cheque dated 21/05/2019 for the fee was cashed on 24/05/19. No further communication was received from the Court.

17) I was now aware that an ambush was planned and I was heading to a kangaroo court as per usual. I now issue a further application in order to try and stop this injustice. I requested a transfer of the entire matter to Nottingham before a JURY as I had repeated in every one of my 80 letters since 01/08/2013 all of which were ignored with no explaination. This application dated 26/06/19 fee paid £255 cheque no 133 cashed 29/06/19 had 3 copies as required and one sealed copy was returned to me. My bank statements confirm that my cheques for these fees were cashed.

18) Now I have an order from HHJ Hellman and I quote “Take note that the application (singular) will take place on” 18.10.19. Please note it does not mention which application, was it the defendants only that would have not surprised me, as there were three but the claimant was not advised. How biased is that!

19) I wrote a letter to Hellman asking for clarification as to which application is to be heard on 18/10/19. No reply was received as usual. My assessment of this dereliction of normal behaviour convinced me that I was to be ignored no matter what and a kangaroo court was set for the 18.10.19 so the outcome would be the same whether I attended or not.

20) On the 15/08/19 I received a further order this time from HHJ Saggerson, this order is deliberately vague with intent to deceive “it is ordered that “list all outstanding application(singular)18/10/19” and sealed. What is it possible to deduce from such an order. The list of applications are or should be already on file but the claimant must not be informed. How is that for Bias!

21) Now the court drops in another Judge HHJ Freeland for the second time, who has been shown as biased and partial previously is now selected to see Mr Browne off with summarily assessed costs with no opportunity to challenge, again par for the course. Had the matter been heard in Nottingham the costs would be 26% of the costs awarded. So this is contrary to the provisions of the “Overriding Objective” to keep costs to a minimum inter alia. I have applied to Freeland for permission to appeal and got no reply, no surprise there. I can only hope that this conspiracy is confined to the lower courts and the Lord/Lady Justices are above this kind of stratagem and can be relied on for an impartial adjudication and a subsequent order for same in due course.

22) Before proceeding on to the biased order itself I made the following comment:

Comment: We expect our judges to be Honourable Principled Moral Ethical honest and wise and above all impartial. Their integrity and impartiality are the bedrock of the entire judicial system. We trust them to ensure fair trials and protect the rights of all litigants’. We expect them to peruse the evidence and purely on the evidence to make a fair Judgment. We expect them to respect fundamental basic Human Rights, ECHR, and HRA, Create a level playing field. To treat litigants in person as described in the “Hand Book for litigants in Person co-written by two of the offending judges in this matter. HHJ Hampton & HHJ Peter Bower. I know I am the victim of corrupt judges in the County Court at Nottingham and Central Court at London. I am confident I can prove this to be the case before impartial Justices at the CAC or a Jury at Nottingham. End of comment.

23) I now come to the order of HHJ Freeland who is sitting on an interlocutory application and substituting it for the substantive significant and crucial case number 3YQ10123 dated 01/08/2013 over 6 years old and now diverts it into an interlocutory application by the defendant, at the same time he dismisses my 2 applications at a cost of £510 as if they did not exist. How biased is that! In effect he did the same as HHJ Godsmark did on 06/08/2014 in an effort to see Mr Browne off. How biased is that!

24) Part one of said order states that the defendants bundle was sent on the 11/10/19 this is as maybe however I did not receive this until midday on 17/10/19. Regardless of this I am expected to respond to this false witness in a day or even a couple of days. All ignored by HHJ Freeland.

25) Part two of the order claims that HHJ Saggerson directed that all applications were to be heard on 18/10/2019. I have no hesitation in accusing HHJ Freeland of blatant lying. I have the order of Saggerson to prove it. In effect the plural was not used at any time on any order. How biased is that?

26) HHJ Freeland only reads the defendants bundle and ignored the 80 plus letters sent to Hellman by Fax, email and Royal Mail recording delivery requesting transfer to Nottingham before a Jury due to bias shown by HHJs Godsmark, Hellman, Freeland, Saggerson Fine and again Freeland that included indisputable evidence over a 6 year period including the claim form itself and subsequent requests for Judgement as the defendant did not comply with the due process, all ignored by Salford who has now joined the conspiracy. How is that for bias! Due to this I know it would not have made any difference whether I attended this hearing or not as this was a kangaroo court and the outcome was predictable!.

27) Now it is ordered.

  1. Unbelievable Staples invokes the Human rights act. He deliberately avoids article 6, 7, inter alia that states I am entitled to a trial before an impartial Judge within a reasonable time, it is six years since my claim 01/08/2013 and still not set down for a substantive hearing even yet before a Jury due to discrimination chicanery sophistry and every other devise these Judges can come up with to see Mr Browne off and his money stolen by perverting the course of Justice
  2. The length of time is over 6 years stalled by the Judges not the claimant. But the fact that he claims partiality from HHJ Freeland comes as no surprise. How is that for bias?
  3. This is further proof that my 6 years old claim has never been heard, regardless of the biased current bogus order of HHJ Freeland

28) I now claim bias against all the Judges involved in this 3YQ10123 and HHJ Freeland and the other Judges involved must withdraw themselves, and instigate a Jury trial in Nottingham without any further delay. This is my wish to the Justices of the CAC, the HHJs fear such a hearing as they have used subterfuge chicanery sophistry to avoid same due to the solidarity of the brotherhood. How biased is that!

29) I now come to the exhibits that are indisputable. Case no 3YQ10123

  1. Appellants Notice
  2. Continuing support for appellants notice
  3. Copy of original claim form dated 01/08/2013 for compensation for police brutality, it also contained instructions that the hearing be in London due to bias in Nottingham.
  4. Grounds for making this claim in a comprehensive report on the assault by the police on Mr Browne that involved the illegal use of CS totally unnecessary and uncalled for!
  5. List of 3 police officers involved in this assault. Causing post dramatic stress disorder to Mr Browne. PLUS 8 officers involved in the closing of ranks and the lies they invented. There are photos of my injuries and 2 doctor’s reports. HHJ Freeland was fully aware of all these facts but he decided to ignore the lot. How biased is that?
  6. Request for Judgement (ignored) due to no response of any kind from the defendant to this legitimate official money claim. How biased is that?
  7. There is at least 80 letters to Hellman (transfer to Nottingham before a Jury) all ignored. However I will only submit 3 lots total 7 pages in hard copy printed on both sides, for the environment. The rest will be on disc should the Lord/Lady Justices require the lot. These letters are statements of truth and nothing but the truth so help me! All ignored as if due process does not apply to HM’s Judges. How biased is that? I remind the current 6 HHJs of the Magna Carta principles that everyone is subject to the law even the judiciary and guarantees the rights of individuals the right to justice and the right to a fair trial. Clearly this does not apply to HHJs as they wreak vengeances on Mr Browne
  8. Letter to Hellman seeking clarification ignored as usual no surprise there. I must be kept out of my own case at the behest of Hellman! Ignored, bias
  9. ***Copy of letter from defendant’s agent page 2&1 agreeing that the case be heard in Nottingham. “there is no good reason to take this case to London” he also agrees a jury trial is right “Is a jury in London any more or less biased against the police than one in Nottingham” HHJ Freeland ignores this and all evidence the shows his judgment is bogus.
  10. ***Copy orders a hearing 01/02/2019 that never took place, claimant not informed, no costs awarded. How biased is that?

***Copy order of DJ Fine dated 09/05/19. The application (singular) be listed etc. before a HHJ to be advised. How biased is that?

***Copy order of HHJ Hellman 13/06/2019 listing two applications to be heard together. No hearing set down. Case almost 6 Years old. How biased is that?

***Copy order dated 25/06/2019 “Take notice the application (singular) hearing will take place on 18/10/19. Preceded by letter dated12/07/19 from the court

***Now another HHJ dropped in: Copy order of HHJ Saggerson 15/08/2019 “List all outstanding application (singular) 18/10/2019. What am I to make of this? How is that for bias. See letter asking for clarification

  1. ***Copy of the order of HHJ Freeland 18/10/2019 that is clearly bogus, the subject of this appeal to the CAC. This was the result of over 6 years judicial stalling as no HHJ was prepared to hear this substantive case and this order is discrimination and bias in no uncertain terms in the hope the claimant will give up and let these Judges steal my money. Already costing Mr Browne the claimant over £6345 in fees alone. All stolen by HMCT service. Designed to get the claimant to give up to avoid a hearing of the matter. How biased is that?
  2. Copy of the claimant’s application to dismiss the defendant’s application to set aside the substantive claim 3YQ10123 that is 6 years old and never been set down or heard even now @ a fee of £255. How biased is that?
  3. Copy of the claimant’s application to transfer the entire matter to Nottingham before a Jury @ a fee of £255. This would be the obvious right thing to do in the circumstances. How is that for extreme bias.
  4. This would put the blame where it rightly belongs and Justice would be done by a Jury. The writer knows right from wrong and this order is wrong and HHJ Freeland knows it, but he chooses to lie to protect HHJ Godsmark
  5. Now another group of orders Copy order of DDJ Freeman transferring 3YQ10123 matter to Central London County Court. Copy order of DJ Silverman transferring the matter to Nottingham. Copy order of HHJ Godsmark transferring it back to Central London County Court. How is that for delaying tactics! Pure and simple Bias as this case must never be heard as it involves HHJ Godsmark in Malfeasance and conspiracy. As he has used his status to avoid a hearing and kept my money fee of £395 for 6 years plus. How biased is that?
  6. ***Pages 5/6 of transcript before HHJ Godsmark at non listed matter, and matter swept under the carpet. How biased is that?
  7. Copy of the listings for that day. No listing for 3YQ10123
  8. This is damning no matter what criteria used and is indisputable proof of discrimination (bias) and a complete denial of “Access to Justice” “HRA”, “Equality Act” inter alia! How biased is that!
  9. Letter to Godsmark reinstating 3YQ10123 very dusty from under the carpet where devoid of conscious HHJ Godsmark placed it months previously to avoid a hearing. Ignored as usual. No hearing took place at any time regardless!
  10. This matter 3YQ10123 started as a mere money claim in Salford, then to Northampton DDJ Freeman (copy) then to London before DJ Silverman(copy) then to Nottingham HHJ Godsmark (copy) letter to Silverman objecting to Nottingham transfer ignored as usual, then to DDJ Wrigley (copy)Nottingham. Order by Godsmark transferring the Wrigley matter back to London(copy) then to HHJ Dight(copy) then to Hellman(copy) London then to Freeland(copy) then to DJ Fine(copy) then to Saggerson(copy) then back to Freeland (copy) where his order endeavours to sweeping the entire matter under the carpet official, copying HHJ Godsmark on 06/08/2014. This is due process according to HHJ Godsmark & now by HHJ Freeland, how biased is that
  11. Three orders involved in this debarcle that are bizarre to say the least. Salford to Northampton where DDJ Freeman orders it to London, London DJ Silverman orders it to Nottingham, HHJ Godsmark orders it back to London. All these transfers were done without any reference to the claimant whatsoever. How biased is that?
  12. Letter to Godsmark recovering the 3YQ10123 matter from under the carpet on the floor of Godsmark’s bench where Godsmark swept it on 06/08/2014. His explanation is absurd, the matter was never listed and nobody knows this better than Godsmark, as he continues his vendetta against J K Browne
  13. Letter to London court dated 28/09/2013 ignored again, this is not due process. How is that for bias?
  14. Letter to defendant dated 16/02/2014. Ignored with impunity. No surprise there. All my letters over 6 years are ignored. Justice is not available to me and my human rights are spit on by our esteemed Judiciary!
  15. Letter to defendant16/03/2012
  16. Bias definition

I now require a hearing before 3 Lord/Lady Justices that I will attend regardless of my problem getting there. As this case is over 6 years old there was a lot more statements and exhibits. Should there be any further questions that the CAC would like to ask, they should not hesitate to contract the undersigned. The writer is fully aware that there might be a conflict of interest before the Honourable Lord/Lady Justices and they might not want to hear this case, this been the case would the CAC send back the bundles and importantly my £528 court fee, that is still retained by the CAC, and I will see exactly what I need to do next.

The undersigned is fully aware of the repetitive

nature of this narrative however this is necessary due to the seriousness of the case and the involvement of HHJs of the brotherhood and that means the CAC may have a conflict of interest that their oath of office requires them to ignore as they are duty bound to be impartial. The bundles will be returned to the CAC w/c 06/01/2020. All the above is proved in the 4 authenticated bundles

Signed…………………………………………….05/11/2019

John Kenneth Browne

When responding, please give PAGE NUMBER & Line number.

Please note that this is a very serious matter and involves the honesty and integrity of our Judiciary, as such must be dealt with by the law Lords as they are impartial Justices at the CAC.

I make no apologies for the repetition in this narrative as 10 years is a long time to be fighting for justice in our courts, and it requires constant repetition to get “Access to Justice” and stop the deliberate prevarication that has lasted over 6 years in this case alone.

I now rely on the honesty, integrity and the impartially of our senior Judges in the Civil Appeals Court. Unfortunately the solidarity of the brotherhood may result in malfeasance. In this circumstance what will the Justices decide? May I please have an order from the Justices in order to move this matter forward to a conclusion?

J K Browne

Attached: Four 4 exhibits that proves Judicial Bias and an abuse of the process by the very people who are paid and sworn to uphold.

  1. Transcript of unlisted hearing before HHJ Godsmark, when 3YQ10123 is swept under the carpet in Godsmark’s room never to be seen again and my £395 in effect stolen.
  2. Actual listing for that day. No mention of 3YQ10123
  3. Order of Godsmark in the High Court that registry at CAC want me to appeal to, this is bias itself by the CAC.
  4. List of Judges involved in this debarcle presided over by HHJ Godsmark. In the previous case, a mere money claim, J K Browne is hit with over £100,000 costs by guess who, HHJ Godsmark who is clearly obsessed with vengeance against Mr Browne to the point of paranoid

PLEASE NOTE PRINTED ON BOTH SIDES WHERE APPLICABLE

This case 2019/P1/12356 must be heard at the Justices at the CAC

as HHJ Godsmark the architect of this 6 year old fiasco and travesty of Justice also sits as a High Court Judge at Nottingham who the associates at the CAC advocate should hear this appeal, this is quite irrational as he has shown actual bias, abuse of Judicial discretion, abuse of Court power in effect malfeasance to the claimant J K Browne many times over the past 8 years, in effect there is no alternative to a CAC Justices hearing and the CAC has direct jurisdiction, to claim otherwise is the subvert and pervert due process and a definite attempt to prevaricate this matter as if 6 years is not enough? see transcript attached before HHJ Godsmark that is also in the 4 bundles ignored by the CAC as is a list of Judges involved in another case before Godsmark and the judges involved in this matter already presented to the CAC. Please note HHJ Godsmark involved throughout both cases.

The correct procedure is simple, A DDJ, DJ is accountable to a circuit Judge(HHJ) who is accountable to the CAC, and in certain exceptional cases to the High Court that was not involved in the case at any time due to the potential of bias. The CAC/High Court are accountable to the Supreme Court. Primarily all are accountable to their oath of office, their impartiality is imperative as the bedrock of our legal system. Litigants must be able to trust our Judges. Unfortunately the Judges involved in this case have cast all this aside in favour of solidarity with the brotherhood. The HHJs have handed down the case to a DJ Fine. In effect they must be impeached. Otherwise they are a law onto themselves and can no longer be trusted.

Proof: If that is not enough proof of bias there is more, this case started in London, HHJ Godsmark ordered it via DJ Silverman to Nottingham where Godsmark buried it never to be seen again or so he thought! I revived this from under the carpet in Godsmark’s private room in June 2017, see reviving letter, again ignored! Godsmark is devoid of conscious! As a result when this failed he ordered it back to London where it was stalled for a further 3 years. How blatantly biased is that. However if that is not enough proof I now provide further evidence of dishonesty and fraud by Godsmark. On 27th June before Godsmark in his capacity as a High Court Judge the case against me was dismissed and I was awarded costs to be assessed if not agreed. I duly made application for same to SCCO only to be told that this application had been transferred to Nottingham for assessment in order that Godsmark could sit in Judgement on himself, when it got to Nottingham it was again buried under the carpet never to be seen again, such arrogance, I had paid £369 court fee for this assessment that was not refunded regardless of my money claim to Salford for same! This money is still outstanding 5 years later! How biased is that? Copy order enclosed. I now have to conclude that the CAC has joined this conspiracy to deny “access to Justice and Human rights to the claimant J K Browne.

Please confirm that this is not true!!?? Now the CAC sends my 4 bundles back with no order and no transfer order this is a clear attempt to continue the prevarication of HHJs Godsmark, Freeland, Hellman, Saggerson, DJ Fine and Freeland for the second time when he dismisses case no 3YQ10123 dated 01/08/2013 with a wave of his hand and 2 applications from the claimant, my application for a transcript of same is ignored, how biased is that?

These 4 bundles 2019/P1/12356 well within the time limit 18/11/2019, the delay is caused by the CAC as it endeavours to avoid a hearing by very devious means as this is an open and shut case. The bundles will now be returned to the CAC for an adjudication and a CAC order before 3 Lord/Lady Justices in January 2020 to be set down ASAP, the fee of £528 already paid and cashed has not been refunded as at 06/01/2020 over 6 weeks later. Does the CAC intend to misappropriate this money. The CAC must retain the £528 and be used for it’s original purpose to pay for the adjudication hearing and order 2019/P1/12356, this is my inalienable right to “access to Justice” not able to be given or taken away because of being protected by statue, to be set down asap in January 2020.

Attachment: Continuing support for Appellant Notice no 2019/P1/12356.

Appeal to the Civil Appeals Court already submitted number 2019/P1/12356 dated 05/11/2019 against order of HHJ Freeland 18/10.2019 in relation to County Court case no 3YQ10123 dated 01/08/2013, stalled for over 6 years by HHJs Nigel Godsmark (ring leader and chair of the brotherhood and Grand master) Simon Freeland, Stephen Hellman, Alan Saggerson, DJ Ruth Fine and GGH Simon Freeman (for the second time) this is not protocol or due process and an abuse of the process, abuse of judicial discretion and abuse of Court power! Such arrogance is unbelievable! It is not possible to trust them to be impartial! In effect they are dishonest and devoid of conscious, is his endemic?

All of the order of HHJ Simon Freeland (enclosed) be rescinded forthwith, as it is not due process and is an abuse of the process discretion and Court power. As, it is based entirely on discrimination (bias) against the claimant!

Equality Act 2010 violations The Equality Act became law in 2010. It covers everyone in Britain and protects people from discrimination, harassment and victimisation.

Human Rights Act violations, In the determining the civil rights of the claimant in this case the Judges failed to take account of article 6 of the HRA. Everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time, over 6 years is not reasonable no matter what criteria used!

Overriding Objective The overriding objective expressly says that the court has to seek to give effect to it when exercising any powers given by the rules or interpreting any rules. But in every other case, whether using its powers or deciding what the rules mean, the court has to take account of the overriding objective.

Access to Justice 1999 violations: Access to justice is a right not a privilege and as such cannot be interpreted to mean anything else. In that regard it will play an important part in helping to maintain the courts commitment to access to Justice as a right available to all. Lord Dyson Master ot the rolls 11th December 2012. This enables people to exercise their rights, challenge discrimination or hold decision-makers to account..

These Acts of Parliament are ignored by HHJs Simon Freeland, Nigel Graham Godsmark who also sits as a High Court Judge, Stephen Godfrey Hellman, Alan Saggerson, & DJ Ruth Fine and I now appeal to the CAC to adjudicate on this entire matter.

HHJ Freeland and others ignore the evidence of 6 years prevaricating to avoid hearing this open and shut case that included over 80 letters each one requesting a transfer to Nottingham before a JURY and got no reply. My rights are spit on and my money claim to Salford for the refund of the fee £395 received no response, went to a hearing before DDJ Wrigley who negated my claim, and awarded costs. I made application to set aside same only to find that High Court Judge Godsmark now transfers this case and 3YQ10123 back to London with no explanation, needless to say the Wrigley order was upheld by HHJ Dight. No surprise there. The 3YQ10123 was stalled again until 18/10/2019 when HHJ Freeland presided over a kangaroo court where the application of the defendant is given priority and favour, and the claimants application to dismiss the defendants dishonest application ignored and dismissed as usual. And the claimant’s second application to transfer the 3YQ10123 matter to Nottingham before a JURY is dismissed ignored and my fee money £395 stolen by HHJ Freeland, who’s order is riddled with bias in every line and every word and nobody is more aware of this than HHJ Freeland himself. The rule of law is ignored, all equal before the law is ignored, as is the Magna Carta that is still in force. The rule on recusal ignored, HRA 1989, Universal Declaration on human rights 1948 inter alia, ignored. HHJ Freeland ignored all the evidence against the defendant that was overwhelming including over 80 statements of truth that are self-evident and numerous exhibits that were all ignored by biased HHJ Freeland and other HHJs. As a result of this bias I have claimed since 01/08/2013 that I am a victim of corruption by HHJ Godsmark of Nottingham supported by HHJs Hellman, Freeland, Saggerson, DJ Fine and Freeland whose order is proof of bias, now read on for further proof of bias!

The claimant is well aware that there is the possibility of “conflict of interest” in the Lord/Lady Justices. From the start of this case 3YQ10123 01/08/2013 the knifes were out for J K Browne by the Judiciary, in effect they have changed the essence of the case in so far as the title is concerned, it is now “HHJs Godsmark, Hellman, Freeland, Saggerson and Freeland again and DJ Ruth Fine against J K Browne! I can only hope that the Justices will be impartial enough to insure that the Judiciary involved are held to account for this malfeasance. And this appeal be granted with costs. There is no doubt that the claimant has been subjected to discrimination, intimidation and bullying and since 01/08/2013 the date of the initial claim and no hearing to date has been set down.

J K Browne has suffered from the effects of this hostile environment for over 6 years created by these HHJs, and the 80 unanswered letters and the clearly ignored the indisputable evidence against the defendant. How biased is that?

ALL of my 80 letters to Hellman from 01.08.2013 to date contained a request to transfer the entire matter to Nottingham before a Jury, and this was supported by the defendant’s copy letter enclosed. Due to bias, access to justice is not available to me in the County Court. Nottingham is where all the parties involved including my chief witness HHJ Godsmark are based & domiciled. Re my application to transfer the entire matter logically to Nottingham making common sense in terms of a whole day wasted in London to say nothing of traveling expenses compared with just a few hours in Nottingham where the claimant could attend. However as per usual Mr Browne a litigant in person must be penalised victimised demonised by the afore mentioned Judiciary in every way possible by order of HHJ Godsmark who involves himself in every aspect of every case in which I am involved. His obsession is associated with a psychiatric disorder.

 

It must be remembered that the case was correctly in London at the start of this case, but HHJ Godsmark surreptitiously ordered the matter transferred to Nottingham, contrary to my Claim form request for the matter to be heard in London due to bias in Nottingham, he later in an entirely different case hearing touched on the matter 3YQ10123 that was not listed, when advised of same he swept the entire matter under the carpet to avoid a hearing, the case was clear cut, but Mr Browne must not be allowed to win anything by order of HHJ Godsmark. At this point it begs the question, why is HHJ Godsmark involving himself in every aspect of every case in which Mr Browne is a litigant. He appears to be making the issue “personal”. However it gets worse!

Having failed to see me off, he surreptitiously transfers the entire matter back to London for personal reasons and as such this is not protocol or due process no matter what criteria used, but deliberate bias! What else could it be? This is done again surreptitiously with no reference or advisement to the claimant whatsoever? My objection to the hearing in London is also ignored, due to an unnecessary waste of time and expense. The defendant had the right to have the case heard in Nottingham but was ordered to London by HHJ Godsmark to deprive the claimant of “access to Justice” 1999 and his human rights “HRA 1989” and the Equality Act inter alia, to say nothing of the hate campaign run by HHJ Godsmark since 2003. HHJ Freeland totally ignored the “overriding objective” one of which was that costs be kept to a minimum instead of which HHJ Freeland went for the maximum at the request of the defendant. HHJ Freeland had already proved to be biased against the claimant previously so I expected there will be favour and partiality for the defendant and the outcome assured. In effect a kangaroo court. This proved to be true, see the order of partial HHJ Freeland as he tries to hit Mr.Browne with nearly £4000 costs that are disproportionate to say the least and the claimant is not allowed an assessment to question this injustice. How biased is that? Mr Browne must not be allowed to win anything no matter what! The effort, energy and fortitude that these judges put in to see Mr Browne off is criminal to say the least.

It also must be noted that the court fee of £395 for this claim paid on 01.08.13 was for a hearing that was never set down at any time so the fee was returnable, regardless of numerous requests this fee was misappropriated. DDJ Wrigley under instructions from Godsmark lied from the bench as did Godsmark on a previous occasion. Is there no end to the malfeasance and obsessive nature of HHJ Godsmark as he wreaks personal vengeance on Mr Browne.

At this point the discrimination and the malfeasance of all the Judges involved is indefensible. Namely HHJ Godsmark (the chair and grand master of the Brotherhood) the main instigator of this debacle and hate campaign (hate Act) in order to avenge DJ Reeson, explanation later, DDJ Wrigley, HHJ Dight, HHJ Freeland, HHJ Hellman, DJ Fine, HHJ Saggerson and now HHJ Freeland again. This amounts to a misuse of judicial discretion and misuse of Court power, in effect a judicial conspiracy, defrauding the claimant in order for HHJ Godsmark to pursue his personal and most virulent hate campaign against Mr Browne and using the brotherhood solidarity of which he is the chair and grand master, to oblige other Judges to breach their oath of office to support him! They must ignore the “overriding objectives CPR part 1.2”. These are the facts that are indisputable and the named Judges are fully aware of this but they have their instructions and obligations to HHJ Godsmark as the chairman of the brotherhood and Grand Master.

I now proceed to the chronology of this matter

1) Claim made in Salford County Court money claim centre on 01/08/2013 with instruction for a London hearing, due to discrimination experienced and proved in Nottingham before HHJ Godsmark.

2) Matter transferred to Northampton before DDJ Freeman who duly transfers the case correctly to London

3) London DJ Silverman processes this claim in the normal way for some time until unbelievably

4) HHJ Godsmark Nottingham applies to Silverman London to have the case transferred to Nottingham this was done surreptitiously without reference to the claimant, not protocol. Misuse judicial discretion and court power leaving J K Browne at the mercy of Biased HHJ Godsmark and that was quick in coming. Rights denied!

5) I write letters to Silverman objecting to this transfer as it is not due process! As it denies the claimant of his rights, that are ignored, it appears I am not to get “access to Justice 1999”

6) The matter is now in Nottingham before HHJ Godsmark and there is nothing I can do, on 06/08/14 bias HHJ Godsmark touches on this case 3YQ10123 that was not listed, in an entirely different matter. When advised HHJ Godsmark of this fact he swept the entire matter under the carpet never to be seen again, or so he thought!

7) I reinstate the case 3YQ10123 in a letter to Godsmark and request a hearing of the matter before a JURY to resolve the matter. This letter is ignored as usual. Clearly, I am “persona non grata” before HHJ Godsmark as he is clearly obsessed to the point of paranoia as he pursues this vendetta against the Claimant on behalf DJ Reeson a fellow member of the brotherhood

8) As a result of Godsmark’s intransigence by ignoring the evidence and sweeping it under the carpet and leaving me in limbo I decide to issue a money claim to Salford for the return of the £395 court fee for 3YQ10123 01.08.13 that was never heard or adjudicated on, and no order issued and just swept under the carpet of HHJ Godsmark bench and as such I was at least entitled to a refund.

9) This caused an implausible reaction from the Court as it refuting my claim and issued a devious defence. This resulted in a hearing before DDJ Wrigley who rejected my claim by saying that this had nothing to do with HHJ Godsmark, clearly it had everything to do with Godsmark, clearly DDJ Wrigley as a junior Judge was taking his instructions from Godsmark. During this so called hearing DDJ Wrigley referred to DJ Reeson, unprompted, as a much respected Judge in the Nottingham Brotherhood where HHJ Godsmark is chair and grand-master. The order is an exhibit.

10) This left me with no choice so I made an application to Nottingham to set Wrigley’s order aside with justifiable grounds. Now for the big surprise of all! Unbelievably

11) There is an order from Godsmark transferring the substantive significate case 3YQ10123 dated 01.08.2013 and the setting aside of the order of Wrigley back to London. Godsmark is using his status to divert the matter away from himself by any means at his disposal as the HHJ Godsmark is devoid of conscious, integrity and common decency! This was done surreptitiously as usual! I was never consulted and was presented with a fait accompli as usual. This is not due process it is abuse of the process by a HHJ who is operating a personal vengeance against Mr Browne on behalf of DJ Reeson.

12) Now the matter is incredible back in London and there is nothing I can do except keep fighting for JUSTICE before an honest and impartial Judge if I can find one. What next I ask myself, the matter is now 5 years old and no resolution in sight. On 05/10/2018 HHJ Hellman makes an order that there will be a CCMC arranged before HHJ Freeland after 28 days.

13) On the 22/10/18 a hearing is set down for 2pm 01/02/19 this hearing was cancelled as without merit on the Courts own volition, without any notice to me and my costs were refused. This is a travesty of justice

14) Now I have an order from DJ Fine 09/05/19 stating that the application of the defendant, this is the first time I was made aware of any application, Is this some kind of ambush by a consortium of Judges to deprive the claimant of his rights to a fair trial before an impartial Judge within a reasonable time as per the HRA provisions. This hearing did not take place either. How biased is that?

15) Now the so called solicitor for the defendant issues an application to cancel the substantive significant case 3YQ10123 dated 01/08/2013 that has never been heard or set down for a hearing. Just swept under the carpet in HHJ Godsmark bench. This is quite absurd and there is no justification or evidence for this application is to be ignored or does this man know something I do not, i.e. the biased Judge has decided to advise the defendant that he will find for him regardless (in effect a kangaroo court). The overwhelming evidence and over 80 letters and exhibits including the Claim form dated 01/08/2013 and requests for Judgment will be ignored by order of HHJ Freeland. The Judges ignore the lot as usual!

16) I decide to issue an application refuting this attempt to pervert the course of Justice, ignored as usual. The order confirms that my application was ignored upon receipt. Three copies were sent to the court as required; one sealed copy must be returned to me, this did not happen and my court fee of £255 was misappropriated. So protocol was ignored again to deprive Mr Browne of his rights to be advised of this wrong doing.

The first I knew that the Court had received my application was the order of HHJ Hellman 13/06/2019 and my cheque dated 21/05/2019 for the fee was cashed on 24/05/19. No further communication was received from the Court.

17) I was now aware that an ambush was planned and I was heading to a kangaroo court as per usual. I now issue a further application in order to try and stop this injustice. I requested a transfer of the entire matter to Nottingham before a JURY as I had repeated in every one of my 80 letters since 01/08/2013 all of which were ignored with no explaination. This application dated 26/06/19 fee paid £255 cheque no 133 cashed 29/06/19 had 3 copies as required and one sealed copy was returned to me. My bank statements confirm that my cheques for these fees were cashed.

18) Now I have an order from HHJ Hellman and I quote “Take note that the application (singular) will take place on” 18.10.19. Please note it does not mention which application, was it the defendants only that would have not surprised me, as there were three but the claimant was not advised. How biased is that!

19) I wrote a letter to Hellman asking for clarification as to which application is to be heard on 18/10/19. No reply was received as usual. My assessment of this dereliction of normal behaviour convinced me that I was to be ignored no matter what and a kangaroo court was set for the 18.10.19 so the outcome would be the same whether I attended or not.

20) On the 15/08/19 I received a further order this time from HHJ Saggerson, this order is deliberately vague with intent to deceive “it is ordered that “list all outstanding application(singular)18/10/19” and sealed. What is it possible to deduce from such an order. The list of applications are or should be already on file but the claimant must not be informed. How is that for Bias!

21) Now the court drops in another Judge HHJ Freeland for the second time, who has been shown as biased and partial previously is now selected to see Mr Browne off with summarily assessed costs with no opportunity to challenge, again par for the course. Had the matter been heard in Nottingham the costs would be 26% of the costs awarded. So this is contrary to the provisions of the “Overriding Objective” to keep costs to a minimum inter alia. I have applied to Freeland for permission to appeal and got no reply, no surprise there. I can only hope that this conspiracy is confined to the lower courts and the Lord/Lady Justices are above this kind of stratagem and can be relied on for an impartial adjudication and a subsequent order for same in due course.

22) Before proceeding on to the biased order itself I made the following comment:

Comment: We expect our judges to be Honourable Principled Moral Ethical honest and wise and above all impartial. Their integrity and impartiality are the bedrock of the entire judicial system. We trust them to ensure fair trials and protect the rights of all litigants’. We expect them to peruse the evidence and purely on the evidence to make a fair Judgment. We expect them to respect fundamental basic Human Rights, ECHR, and HRA, Create a level playing field. To treat litigants in person as described in the “Hand Book for litigants in Person co-written by two of the offending judges in this matter. HHJ Hampton & HHJ Peter Bower. I know I am the victim of corrupt judges in the County Court at Nottingham and Central Court at London. I am confident I can prove this to be the case before impartial Justices at the CAC or a Jury at Nottingham. End of comment.

23) I now come to the order of HHJ Freeland who is sitting on an interlocutory application and substituting it for the substantive significant and crucial case number 3YQ10123 dated 01/08/2013 over 6 years old and now diverts it into an interlocutory application by the defendant, at the same time he dismisses my 2 applications at a cost of £510 as if they did not exist. How biased is that! In effect he did the same as HHJ Godsmark did on 06/08/2014 in an effort to see Mr Browne off. How biased is that!

24) Part one of said order states that the defendants bundle was sent on the 11/10/19 this is as maybe however I did not receive this until midday on 17/10/19. Regardless of this I am expected to respond to this false witness in a day or even a couple of days. All ignored by HHJ Freeland.

25) Part two of the order claims that HHJ Saggerson directed that all applications were to be heard on 18/10/2019. I have no hesitation in accusing HHJ Freeland of blatant lying. I have the order of Saggerson to prove it. In effect the plural was not used at any time on any order. How biased is that?

26) HHJ Freeland only reads the defendants bundle and ignored the 80 plus letters sent to Hellman by Fax, email and Royal Mail recording delivery requesting transfer to Nottingham before a Jury due to bias shown by HHJs Godsmark, Hellman, Freeland, Saggerson Fine and again Freeland that included indisputable evidence over a 6 year period including the claim form itself and subsequent requests for Judgement as the defendant did not comply with the due process, all ignored by Salford who has now joined the conspiracy. How is that for bias! Due to this I know it would not have made any difference whether I attended this hearing or not as this was a kangaroo court and the outcome was predictable!.

27) Now it is ordered.

  1. Unbelievable Staples invokes the Human rights act. He deliberately avoids article 6, 7, inter alia that states I am entitled to a trial before an impartial Judge within a reasonable time, it is six years since my claim 01/08/2013 and still not set down for a substantive hearing even yet before a Jury due to discrimination chicanery sophistry and every other devise these Judges can come up with to see Mr Browne off and his money stolen by perverting the course of Justice
  2. The length of time is over 6 years stalled by the Judges not the claimant. But the fact that he claims partiality from HHJ Freeland comes as no surprise. How is that for bias?
  3. This is further proof that my 6 years old claim has never been heard, regardless of the biased current bogus order of HHJ Freeland

28) I now claim bias against all the Judges involved in this 3YQ10123 and HHJ Freeland and the other Judges involved must withdraw themselves, and instigate a Jury trial in Nottingham without any further delay. This is my wish to the Justices of the CAC, the HHJs fear such a hearing as they have used subterfuge chicanery sophistry to avoid same due to the solidarity of the brotherhood. How biased is that!

29) I now come to the exhibits that are indisputable. Case no 3YQ10123

  1. Appellants Notice
  2. Continuing support for appellants notice
  3. Copy of original claim form dated 01/08/2013 for compensation for police brutality, it also contained instructions that the hearing be in London due to bias in Nottingham.
  4. Grounds for making this claim in a comprehensive report on the assault by the police on Mr Browne that involved the illegal use of CS totally unnecessary and uncalled for!
  5. List of 3 police officers involved in this assault. Causing post dramatic stress disorder to Mr Browne. PLUS 8 officers involved in the closing of ranks and the lies they invented. There are photos of my injuries and 2 doctor’s reports. HHJ Freeland was fully aware of all these facts but he decided to ignore the lot. How biased is that?
  6. Request for Judgement (ignored) due to no response of any kind from the defendant to this legitimate official money claim. How biased is that?
  7. There is at least 80 letters to Hellman (transfer to Nottingham before a Jury) all ignored. However I will only submit 3 lots total 7 pages in hard copy printed on both sides, for the environment. The rest will be on disc should the Lord/Lady Justices require the lot. These letters are statements of truth and nothing but the truth so help me! All ignored as if due process does not apply to HM’s Judges. How biased is that? I remind the current 6 HHJs of the Magna Carta principles that everyone is subject to the law even the judiciary and guarantees the rights of individuals the right to justice and the right to a fair trial. Clearly this does not apply to HHJs as they wreak vengeances on Mr Browne
  8. Letter to Hellman seeking clarification ignored as usual no surprise there. I must be kept out of my own case at the behest of Hellman! Ignored, bias
  9. ***Copy of letter from defendant’s agent page 2&1 agreeing that the case be heard in Nottingham. “there is no good reason to take this case to London” he also agrees a jury trial is right “Is a jury in London any more or less biased against the police than one in Nottingham” HHJ Freeland ignores this and all evidence the shows his judgment is bogus.
  10. ***Copy orders a hearing 01/02/2019 that never took place, claimant not informed, no costs awarded. How biased is that?

***Copy order of DJ Fine dated 09/05/19. The application (singular) be listed etc. before a HHJ to be advised. How biased is that?

***Copy order of HHJ Hellman 13/06/2019 listing two applications to be heard together. No hearing set down. Case almost 6 Years old. How biased is that?

***Copy order dated 25/06/2019 “Take notice the application (singular) hearing will take place on 18/10/19. Preceded by letter dated12/07/19 from the court

***Now another HHJ dropped in: Copy order of HHJ Saggerson 15/08/2019 “List all outstanding application (singular) 18/10/2019. What am I to make of this? How is that for bias. See letter asking for clarification

  1. ***Copy of the order of HHJ Freeland 18/10/2019 that is clearly bogus, the subject of this appeal to the CAC. This was the result of over 6 years judicial stalling as no HHJ was prepared to hear this substantive case and this order is discrimination and bias in no uncertain terms in the hope the claimant will give up and let these Judges steal my money. Already costing Mr Browne the claimant over £6345 in fees alone. All stolen by HMCT service. Designed to get the claimant to give up to avoid a hearing of the matter. How biased is that?
  2. Copy of the claimant’s application to dismiss the defendant’s application to set aside the substantive claim 3YQ10123 that is 6 years old and never been set down or heard even now @ a fee of £255. How biased is that?
  3. Copy of the claimant’s application to transfer the entire matter to Nottingham before a Jury @ a fee of £255. This would be the obvious right thing to do in the circumstances. How is that for extreme bias.
  4. This would put the blame where it rightly belongs and Justice would be done by a Jury. The writer knows right from wrong and this order is wrong and HHJ Freeland knows it, but he chooses to lie to protect HHJ Godsmark
  5. Now another group of orders Copy order of DDJ Freeman transferring 3YQ10123 matter to Central London County Court. Copy order of DJ Silverman transferring the matter to Nottingham. Copy order of HHJ Godsmark transferring it back to Central London County Court. How is that for delaying tactics! Pure and simple Bias as this case must never be heard as it involves HHJ Godsmark in Malfeasance and conspiracy. As he has used his status to avoid a hearing and kept my money fee of £395 for 6 years plus. How biased is that?
  6. ***Pages 5/6 of transcript before HHJ Godsmark at non listed matter, and matter swept under the carpet. How biased is that?
  7. Copy of the listings for that day. No listing for 3YQ10123
  8. This is damning no matter what criteria used and is indisputable proof of discrimination (bias) and a complete denial of “Access to Justice” “HRA”, “Equality Act” inter alia! How biased is that!
  9. Letter to Godsmark reinstating 3YQ10123 very dusty from under the carpet where devoid of conscious HHJ Godsmark placed it months previously to avoid a hearing. Ignored as usual. No hearing took place at any time regardless!
  10. This matter 3YQ10123 started as a mere money claim in Salford, then to Northampton DDJ Freeman (copy) then to London before DJ Silverman(copy) then to Nottingham HHJ Godsmark (copy) letter to Silverman objecting to Nottingham transfer ignored as usual, then to DDJ Wrigley (copy)Nottingham. Order by Godsmark transferring the Wrigley matter back to London(copy) then to HHJ Dight(copy) then to Hellman(copy) London then to Freeland(copy) then to DJ Fine(copy) then to Saggerson(copy) then back to Freeland (copy) where his order endeavours to sweeping the entire matter under the carpet official, copying HHJ Godsmark on 06/08/2014. This is due process according to HHJ Godsmark & now by HHJ Freeland, how biased is that
  11. Three orders involved in this debarcle that are bizarre to say the least. Salford to Northampton where DDJ Freeman orders it to London, London DJ Silverman orders it to Nottingham, HHJ Godsmark orders it back to London. All these transfers were done without any reference to the claimant whatsoever. How biased is that?
  12. Letter to Godsmark recovering the 3YQ10123 matter from under the carpet on the floor of Godsmark’s bench where Godsmark swept it on 06/08/2014. His explanation is absurd, the matter was never listed and nobody knows this better than Godsmark, as he continues his vendetta against J K Browne
  13. Letter to London court dated 28/09/2013 ignored again, this is not due process. How is that for bias?
  14. Letter to defendant dated 16/02/2014. Ignored with impunity. No surprise there. All my letters over 6 years are ignored. Justice is not available to me and my human rights are spit on by our esteemed Judiciary!
  15. Letter to defendant16/03/2012
  16. Bias definition

I now require a hearing before 3 Lord/Lady Justices that I will attend regardless of my problem getting there. As this case is over 6 years old there was a lot more statements and exhibits. Should there be any further questions that the CAC would like to ask, they should not hesitate to contract the undersigned. The writer is fully aware that there might be a conflict of interest before the Honourable Lord/Lady Justices and they might not want to hear this case, this been the case would the CAC send back the bundles and importantly my £528 court fee, that is still retained by the CAC, and I will see exactly what I need to do next.

The undersigned is fully aware of the repetitive

nature of this narrative however this is necessary due to the seriousness of the case and the involvement of HHJs of the brotherhood and that means the CAC may have a conflict of interest that their oath of office requires them to ignore as they are duty bound to be impartial. The bundles will be returned to the CAC w/c 06/01/2020. All the above is proved in the 4 authenticated bundles

Signed…………………………………………….05/11/2019

John Kenneth Browne

When responding, please give PAGE NUMBER & Line number.

Please note that this is a very serious matter and involves the honesty and integrity of our Judiciary, as such must be dealt with by the law Lords as they are impartial Justices at the CAC.

I make no apologies for the repetition in this narrative as 10 years is a long time to be fighting for justice in our courts, and it requires constant repetition to get “Access to Justice” and stop the deliberate prevarication that has lasted over 6 years in this case alone.

I now rely on the honesty, integrity and the impartially of our senior Judges in the Civil Appeals Court. Unfortunately the solidarity of the brotherhood may result in malfeasance. In this circumstance what will the Justices decide? May I please have an order from the Justices in order to move this matter forward to a conclusion?

J K Browne

Attached: Four 4 exhibits that proves Judicial Bias and an abuse of the process by the very people who are paid and sworn to uphold.

  1. Transcript of unlisted hearing before HHJ Godsmark, when 3YQ10123 is swept under the carpet in Godsmark’s room never to be seen again and my £395 in effect stolen.
  2. Actual listing for that day. No mention of 3YQ10123
  3. Order of Godsmark in the High Court that registry at CAC want me to appeal to, this is bias itself by the CAC.
  4. List of Judges involved in this debarcle presided over by HHJ Godsmark. In the previous case, a mere money claim, J K Browne is hit with over £100,000 costs by guess who, HHJ Godsmark who is clearly obsessed with vengeance against Mr Browne to the point of paranoid

PLEASE NOTE PRINTED ON BOTH SIDES WHERE APPLICABLE

This case 2019/P1/12356 must be heard at the Justices at the CAC

as HHJ Godsmark the architect of this 6 year old fiasco and travesty of Justice also sits as a High Court Judge at Nottingham who the associates at the CAC advocate should hear this appeal, this is quite irrational as he has shown actual bias, abuse of Judicial discretion, abuse of Court power in effect malfeasance to the claimant J K Browne many times over the past 8 years, in effect there is no alternative to a CAC Justices hearing and the CAC has direct jurisdiction, to claim otherwise is the subvert and pervert due process and a definite attempt to prevaricate this matter as if 6 years is not enough? see transcript attached before HHJ Godsmark that is also in the 4 bundles ignored by the CAC as is a list of Judges involved in another case before Godsmark and the judges involved in this matter already presented to the CAC. Please note HHJ Godsmark involved throughout both cases.

The correct procedure is simple, A DDJ, DJ is accountable to a circuit Judge(HHJ) who is accountable to the CAC, and in certain exceptional cases to the High Court that was not involved in the case at any time due to the potential of bias. The CAC/High Court are accountable to the Supreme Court. Primarily all are accountable to their oath of office, their impartiality is imperative as the bedrock of our legal system. Litigants must be able to trust our Judges. Unfortunately the Judges involved in this case have cast all this aside in favour of solidarity with the brotherhood. The HHJs have handed down the case to a DJ Fine. In effect they must be impeached. Otherwise they are a law onto themselves and can no longer be trusted.

Proof: If that is not enough proof of bias there is more, this case started in London, HHJ Godsmark ordered it via DJ Silverman to Nottingham where Godsmark buried it never to be seen again or so he thought! I revived this from under the carpet in Godsmark’s private room in June 2017, see reviving letter, again ignored! Godsmark is devoid of conscious! As a result when this failed he ordered it back to London where it was stalled for a further 3 years. How blatantly biased is that. However if that is not enough proof I now provide further evidence of dishonesty and fraud by Godsmark. On 27th June before Godsmark in his capacity as a High Court Judge the case against me was dismissed and I was awarded costs to be assessed if not agreed. I duly made application for same to SCCO only to be told that this application had been transferred to Nottingham for assessment in order that Godsmark could sit in Judgement on himself, when it got to Nottingham it was again buried under the carpet never to be seen again, such arrogance, I had paid £369 court fee for this assessment that was not refunded regardless of my money claim to Salford for same! This money is still outstanding 5 years later! How biased is that? Copy order enclosed. I now have to conclude that the CAC has joined this conspiracy to deny “access to Justice and Human rights to the claimant J K Browne.

Please confirm that this is not true!!?? Now the CAC sends my 4 bundles back with no order and no transfer order this is a clear attempt to continue the prevarication of HHJs Godsmark, Freeland, Hellman, Saggerson, DJ Fine and Freeland for the second time when he dismisses case no 3YQ10123 dated 01/08/2013 with a wave of his hand and 2 applications from the claimant, my application for a transcript of same is ignored, how biased is that?

These 4 bundles 2019/P1/12356 well within the time limit 18/11/2019, the delay is caused by the CAC as it endeavours to avoid a hearing by very devious means as this is an open and shut case. The bundles will now be returned to the CAC for an adjudication and a CAC order before 3 Lord/Lady Justices in January 2020 to be set down ASAP, the fee of £528 already paid and cashed has not been refunded as at 06/01/2020 over 6 weeks later. Does the CAC intend to misappropriate this money. The CAC must retain the £528 and be used for it’s original purpose to pay for the adjudication hearing and order 2019/P1/12356, this is my inalienable right to “access to Justice” not able to be given or taken away because of being protected by statue, to be set down asap in January 2020.

Attachment: Continuing support for Appellant Notice no 2019/P1/12356.

Appeal to the Civil Appeals Court already submitted number 2019/P1/12356 dated 05/11/2019 against order of HHJ Freeland 18/10.2019 in relation to County Court case no 3YQ10123 dated 01/08/2013, stalled for over 6 years by HHJs Nigel Godsmark (ring leader and chair of the brotherhood and Grand master) Simon Freeland, Stephen Hellman, Alan Saggerson, DJ Ruth Fine and GGH Simon Freeman (for the second time) this is not protocol or due process and an abuse of the process, abuse of judicial discretion and abuse of Court power! Such arrogance is unbelievable! It is not possible to trust them to be impartial! In effect they are dishonest and devoid of conscious, is his endemic?

All of the order of HHJ Simon Freeland (enclosed) be rescinded forthwith, as it is not due process and is an abuse of the process discretion and Court power. As, it is based entirely on discrimination (bias) against the claimant!

Equality Act 2010 violations The Equality Act became law in 2010. It covers everyone in Britain and protects people from discrimination, harassment and victimisation.

Human Rights Act violations, In the determining the civil rights of the claimant in this case the Judges failed to take account of article 6 of the HRA. Everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time, over 6 years is not reasonable no matter what criteria used!

Overriding Objective The overriding objective expressly says that the court has to seek to give effect to it when exercising any powers given by the rules or interpreting any rules. But in every other case, whether using its powers or deciding what the rules mean, the court has to take account of the overriding objective.

Access to Justice 1999 violations: Access to justice is a right not a privilege and as such cannot be interpreted to mean anything else. In that regard it will play an important part in helping to maintain the courts commitment to access to Justice as a right available to all. Lord Dyson Master ot the rolls 11th December 2012. This enables people to exercise their rights, challenge discrimination or hold decision-makers to account..

These Acts of Parliament are ignored by HHJs Simon Freeland, Nigel Graham Godsmark who also sits as a High Court Judge, Stephen Godfrey Hellman, Alan Saggerson, & DJ Ruth Fine and I now appeal to the CAC to adjudicate on this entire matter.

HHJ Freeland and others ignore the evidence of 6 years prevaricating to avoid hearing this open and shut case that included over 80 letters each one requesting a transfer to Nottingham before a JURY and got no reply. My rights are spit on and my money claim to Salford for the refund of the fee £395 received no response, went to a hearing before DDJ Wrigley who negated my claim, and awarded costs. I made application to set aside same only to find that High Court Judge Godsmark now transfers this case and 3YQ10123 back to London with no explanation, needless to say the Wrigley order was upheld by HHJ Dight. No surprise there. The 3YQ10123 was stalled again until 18/10/2019 when HHJ Freeland presided over a kangaroo court where the application of the defendant is given priority and favour, and the claimants application to dismiss the defendants dishonest application ignored and dismissed as usual. And the claimant’s second application to transfer the 3YQ10123 matter to Nottingham before a JURY is dismissed ignored and my fee money £395 stolen by HHJ Freeland, who’s order is riddled with bias in every line and every word and nobody is more aware of this than HHJ Freeland himself. The rule of law is ignored, all equal before the law is ignored, as is the Magna Carta that is still in force. The rule on recusal ignored, HRA 1989, Universal Declaration on human rights 1948 inter alia, ignored. HHJ Freeland ignored all the evidence against the defendant that was overwhelming including over 80 statements of truth that are self-evident and numerous exhibits that were all ignored by biased HHJ Freeland and other HHJs. As a result of this bias I have claimed since 01/08/2013 that I am a victim of corruption by HHJ Godsmark of Nottingham supported by HHJs Hellman, Freeland, Saggerson, DJ Fine and Freeland whose order is proof of bias, now read on for further proof of bias!

The claimant is well aware that there is the possibility of “conflict of interest” in the Lord/Lady Justices. From the start of this case 3YQ10123 01/08/2013 the knifes were out for J K Browne by the Judiciary, in effect they have changed the essence of the case in so far as the title is concerned, it is now “HHJs Godsmark, Hellman, Freeland, Saggerson and Freeland again and DJ Ruth Fine against J K Browne! I can only hope that the Justices will be impartial enough to insure that the Judiciary involved are held to account for this malfeasance. And this appeal be granted with costs. There is no doubt that the claimant has been subjected to discrimination, intimidation and bullying and since 01/08/2013 the date of the initial claim and no hearing to date has been set down.

J K Browne has suffered from the effects of this hostile environment for over 6 years created by these HHJs, and the 80 unanswered letters and the clearly ignored the indisputable evidence against the defendant. How biased is that?

ALL of my 80 letters to Hellman from 01.08.2013 to date contained a request to transfer the entire matter to Nottingham before a Jury, and this was supported by the defendant’s copy letter enclosed. Due to bias, access to justice is not available to me in the County Court. Nottingham is where all the parties involved including my chief witness HHJ Godsmark are based & domiciled. Re my application to transfer the entire matter logically to Nottingham making common sense in terms of a whole day wasted in London to say nothing of traveling expenses compared with just a few hours in Nottingham where the claimant could attend. However as per usual Mr Browne a litigant in person must be penalised victimised demonised by the afore mentioned Judiciary in every way possible by order of HHJ Godsmark who involves himself in every aspect of every case in which I am involved. His obsession is associated with a psychiatric disorder.

 

It must be remembered that the case was correctly in London at the start of this case, but HHJ Godsmark surreptitiously ordered the matter transferred to Nottingham, contrary to my Claim form request for the matter to be heard in London due to bias in Nottingham, he later in an entirely different case hearing touched on the matter 3YQ10123 that was not listed, when advised of same he swept the entire matter under the carpet to avoid a hearing, the case was clear cut, but Mr Browne must not be allowed to win anything by order of HHJ Godsmark. At this point it begs the question, why is HHJ Godsmark involving himself in every aspect of every case in which Mr Browne is a litigant. He appears to be making the issue “personal”. However it gets worse!

Having failed to see me off, he surreptitiously transfers the entire matter back to London for personal reasons and as such this is not protocol or due process no matter what criteria used, but deliberate bias! What else could it be? This is done again surreptitiously with no reference or advisement to the claimant whatsoever? My objection to the hearing in London is also ignored, due to an unnecessary waste of time and expense. The defendant had the right to have the case heard in Nottingham but was ordered to London by HHJ Godsmark to deprive the claimant of “access to Justice” 1999 and his human rights “HRA 1989” and the Equality Act inter alia, to say nothing of the hate campaign run by HHJ Godsmark since 2003. HHJ Freeland totally ignored the “overriding objective” one of which was that costs be kept to a minimum instead of which HHJ Freeland went for the maximum at the request of the defendant. HHJ Freeland had already proved to be biased against the claimant previously so I expected there will be favour and partiality for the defendant and the outcome assured. In effect a kangaroo court. This proved to be true, see the order of partial HHJ Freeland as he tries to hit Mr.Browne with nearly £4000 costs that are disproportionate to say the least and the claimant is not allowed an assessment to question this injustice. How biased is that? Mr Browne must not be allowed to win anything no matter what! The effort, energy and fortitude that these judges put in to see Mr Browne off is criminal to say the least.

It also must be noted that the court fee of £395 for this claim paid on 01.08.13 was for a hearing that was never set down at any time so the fee was returnable, regardless of numerous requests this fee was misappropriated. DDJ Wrigley under instructions from Godsmark lied from the bench as did Godsmark on a previous occasion. Is there no end to the malfeasance and obsessive nature of HHJ Godsmark as he wreaks personal vengeance on Mr Browne.

At this point the discrimination and the malfeasance of all the Judges involved is indefensible. Namely HHJ Godsmark (the chair and grand master of the Brotherhood) the main instigator of this debacle and hate campaign (hate Act) in order to avenge DJ Reeson, explanation later, DDJ Wrigley, HHJ Dight, HHJ Freeland, HHJ Hellman, DJ Fine, HHJ Saggerson and now HHJ Freeland again. This amounts to a misuse of judicial discretion and misuse of Court power, in effect a judicial conspiracy, defrauding the claimant in order for HHJ Godsmark to pursue his personal and most virulent hate campaign against Mr Browne and using the brotherhood solidarity of which he is the chair and grand master, to oblige other Judges to breach their oath of office to support him! They must ignore the “overriding objectives CPR part 1.2”. These are the facts that are indisputable and the named Judges are fully aware of this but they have their instructions and obligations to HHJ Godsmark as the chairman of the brotherhood and Grand Master.

I now proceed to the chronology of this matter

1) Claim made in Salford County Court money claim centre on 01/08/2013 with instruction for a London hearing, due to discrimination experienced and proved in Nottingham before HHJ Godsmark.

2) Matter transferred to Northampton before DDJ Freeman who duly transfers the case correctly to London

3) London DJ Silverman processes this claim in the normal way for some time until unbelievably

4) HHJ Godsmark Nottingham applies to Silverman London to have the case transferred to Nottingham this was done surreptitiously without reference to the claimant, not protocol. Misuse judicial discretion and court power leaving J K Browne at the mercy of Biased HHJ Godsmark and that was quick in coming. Rights denied!

5) I write letters to Silverman objecting to this transfer as it is not due process! As it denies the claimant of his rights, that are ignored, it appears I am not to get “access to Justice 1999”

6) The matter is now in Nottingham before HHJ Godsmark and there is nothing I can do, on 06/08/14 bias HHJ Godsmark touches on this case 3YQ10123 that was not listed, in an entirely different matter. When advised HHJ Godsmark of this fact he swept the entire matter under the carpet never to be seen again, or so he thought!

7) I reinstate the case 3YQ10123 in a letter to Godsmark and request a hearing of the matter before a JURY to resolve the matter. This letter is ignored as usual. Clearly, I am “persona non grata” before HHJ Godsmark as he is clearly obsessed to the point of paranoia as he pursues this vendetta against the Claimant on behalf DJ Reeson a fellow member of the brotherhood

8) As a result of Godsmark’s intransigence by ignoring the evidence and sweeping it under the carpet and leaving me in limbo I decide to issue a money claim to Salford for the return of the £395 court fee for 3YQ10123 01.08.13 that was never heard or adjudicated on, and no order issued and just swept under the carpet of HHJ Godsmark bench and as such I was at least entitled to a refund.

9) This caused an implausible reaction from the Court as it refuting my claim and issued a devious defence. This resulted in a hearing before DDJ Wrigley who rejected my claim by saying that this had nothing to do with HHJ Godsmark, clearly it had everything to do with Godsmark, clearly DDJ Wrigley as a junior Judge was taking his instructions from Godsmark. During this so called hearing DDJ Wrigley referred to DJ Reeson, unprompted, as a much respected Judge in the Nottingham Brotherhood where HHJ Godsmark is chair and grand-master. The order is an exhibit.

10) This left me with no choice so I made an application to Nottingham to set Wrigley’s order aside with justifiable grounds. Now for the big surprise of all! Unbelievably

11) There is an order from Godsmark transferring the substantive significate case 3YQ10123 dated 01.08.2013 and the setting aside of the order of Wrigley back to London. Godsmark is using his status to divert the matter away from himself by any means at his disposal as the HHJ Godsmark is devoid of conscious, integrity and common decency! This was done surreptitiously as usual! I was never consulted and was presented with a fait accompli as usual. This is not due process it is abuse of the process by a HHJ who is operating a personal vengeance against Mr Browne on behalf of DJ Reeson.

12) Now the matter is incredible back in London and there is nothing I can do except keep fighting for JUSTICE before an honest and impartial Judge if I can find one. What next I ask myself, the matter is now 5 years old and no resolution in sight. On 05/10/2018 HHJ Hellman makes an order that there will be a CCMC arranged before HHJ Freeland after 28 days.

13) On the 22/10/18 a hearing is set down for 2pm 01/02/19 this hearing was cancelled as without merit on the Courts own volition, without any notice to me and my costs were refused. This is a travesty of justice

14) Now I have an order from DJ Fine 09/05/19 stating that the application of the defendant, this is the first time I was made aware of any application, Is this some kind of ambush by a consortium of Judges to deprive the claimant of his rights to a fair trial before an impartial Judge within a reasonable time as per the HRA provisions. This hearing did not take place either. How biased is that?

15) Now the so called solicitor for the defendant issues an application to cancel the substantive significant case 3YQ10123 dated 01/08/2013 that has never been heard or set down for a hearing. Just swept under the carpet in HHJ Godsmark bench. This is quite absurd and there is no justification or evidence for this application is to be ignored or does this man know something I do not, i.e. the biased Judge has decided to advise the defendant that he will find for him regardless (in effect a kangaroo court). The overwhelming evidence and over 80 letters and exhibits including the Claim form dated 01/08/2013 and requests for Judgment will be ignored by order of HHJ Freeland. The Judges ignore the lot as usual!

16) I decide to issue an application refuting this attempt to pervert the course of Justice, ignored as usual. The order confirms that my application was ignored upon receipt. Three copies were sent to the court as required; one sealed copy must be returned to me, this did not happen and my court fee of £255 was misappropriated. So protocol was ignored again to deprive Mr Browne of his rights to be advised of this wrong doing.

The first I knew that the Court had received my application was the order of HHJ Hellman 13/06/2019 and my cheque dated 21/05/2019 for the fee was cashed on 24/05/19. No further communication was received from the Court.

17) I was now aware that an ambush was planned and I was heading to a kangaroo court as per usual. I now issue a further application in order to try and stop this injustice. I requested a transfer of the entire matter to Nottingham before a JURY as I had repeated in every one of my 80 letters since 01/08/2013 all of which were ignored with no explaination. This application dated 26/06/19 fee paid £255 cheque no 133 cashed 29/06/19 had 3 copies as required and one sealed copy was returned to me. My bank statements confirm that my cheques for these fees were cashed.

18) Now I have an order from HHJ Hellman and I quote “Take note that the application (singular) will take place on” 18.10.19. Please note it does not mention which application, was it the defendants only that would have not surprised me, as there were three but the claimant was not advised. How biased is that!

19) I wrote a letter to Hellman asking for clarification as to which application is to be heard on 18/10/19. No reply was received as usual. My assessment of this dereliction of normal behaviour convinced me that I was to be ignored no matter what and a kangaroo court was set for the 18.10.19 so the outcome would be the same whether I attended or not.

20) On the 15/08/19 I received a further order this time from HHJ Saggerson, this order is deliberately vague with intent to deceive “it is ordered that “list all outstanding application(singular)18/10/19” and sealed. What is it possible to deduce from such an order. The list of applications are or should be already on file but the claimant must not be informed. How is that for Bias!

21) Now the court drops in another Judge HHJ Freeland for the second time, who has been shown as biased and partial previously is now selected to see Mr Browne off with summarily assessed costs with no opportunity to challenge, again par for the course. Had the matter been heard in Nottingham the costs would be 26% of the costs awarded. So this is contrary to the provisions of the “Overriding Objective” to keep costs to a minimum inter alia. I have applied to Freeland for permission to appeal and got no reply, no surprise there. I can only hope that this conspiracy is confined to the lower courts and the Lord/Lady Justices are above this kind of stratagem and can be relied on for an impartial adjudication and a subsequent order for same in due course.

22) Before proceeding on to the biased order itself I made the following comment:

Comment: We expect our judges to be Honourable Principled Moral Ethical honest and wise and above all impartial. Their integrity and impartiality are the bedrock of the entire judicial system. We trust them to ensure fair trials and protect the rights of all litigants’. We expect them to peruse the evidence and purely on the evidence to make a fair Judgment. We expect them to respect fundamental basic Human Rights, ECHR, and HRA, Create a level playing field. To treat litigants in person as described in the “Hand Book for litigants in Person co-written by two of the offending judges in this matter. HHJ Hampton & HHJ Peter Bower. I know I am the victim of corrupt judges in the County Court at Nottingham and Central Court at London. I am confident I can prove this to be the case before impartial Justices at the CAC or a Jury at Nottingham. End of comment.

23) I now come to the order of HHJ Freeland who is sitting on an interlocutory application and substituting it for the substantive significant and crucial case number 3YQ10123 dated 01/08/2013 over 6 years old and now diverts it into an interlocutory application by the defendant, at the same time he dismisses my 2 applications at a cost of £510 as if they did not exist. How biased is that! In effect he did the same as HHJ Godsmark did on 06/08/2014 in an effort to see Mr Browne off. How biased is that!

24) Part one of said order states that the defendants bundle was sent on the 11/10/19 this is as maybe however I did not receive this until midday on 17/10/19. Regardless of this I am expected to respond to this false witness in a day or even a couple of days. All ignored by HHJ Freeland.

25) Part two of the order claims that HHJ Saggerson directed that all applications were to be heard on 18/10/2019. I have no hesitation in accusing HHJ Freeland of blatant lying. I have the order of Saggerson to prove it. In effect the plural was not used at any time on any order. How biased is that?

26) HHJ Freeland only reads the defendants bundle and ignored the 80 plus letters sent to Hellman by Fax, email and Royal Mail recording delivery requesting transfer to Nottingham before a Jury due to bias shown by HHJs Godsmark, Hellman, Freeland, Saggerson Fine and again Freeland that included indisputable evidence over a 6 year period including the claim form itself and subsequent requests for Judgement as the defendant did not comply with the due process, all ignored by Salford who has now joined the conspiracy. How is that for bias! Due to this I know it would not have made any difference whether I attended this hearing or not as this was a kangaroo court and the outcome was predictable!.

27) Now it is ordered.

  1. Unbelievable Staples invokes the Human rights act. He deliberately avoids article 6, 7, inter alia that states I am entitled to a trial before an impartial Judge within a reasonable time, it is six years since my claim 01/08/2013 and still not set down for a substantive hearing even yet before a Jury due to discrimination chicanery sophistry and every other devise these Judges can come up with to see Mr Browne off and his money stolen by perverting the course of Justice
  2. The length of time is over 6 years stalled by the Judges not the claimant. But the fact that he claims partiality from HHJ Freeland comes as no surprise. How is that for bias?
  3. This is further proof that my 6 years old claim has never been heard, regardless of the biased current bogus order of HHJ Freeland

28) I now claim bias against all the Judges involved in this 3YQ10123 and HHJ Freeland and the other Judges involved must withdraw themselves, and instigate a Jury trial in Nottingham without any further delay. This is my wish to the Justices of the CAC, the HHJs fear such a hearing as they have used subterfuge chicanery sophistry to avoid same due to the solidarity of the brotherhood. How biased is that!

29) I now come to the exhibits that are indisputable. Case no 3YQ10123

  1. Appellants Notice
  2. Continuing support for appellants notice
  3. Copy of original claim form dated 01/08/2013 for compensation for police brutality, it also contained instructions that the hearing be in London due to bias in Nottingham.
  4. Grounds for making this claim in a comprehensive report on the assault by the police on Mr Browne that involved the illegal use of CS totally unnecessary and uncalled for!
  5. List of 3 police officers involved in this assault. Causing post dramatic stress disorder to Mr Browne. PLUS 8 officers involved in the closing of ranks and the lies they invented. There are photos of my injuries and 2 doctor’s reports. HHJ Freeland was fully aware of all these facts but he decided to ignore the lot. How biased is that?
  6. Request for Judgement (ignored) due to no response of any kind from the defendant to this legitimate official money claim. How biased is that?
  7. There is at least 80 letters to Hellman (transfer to Nottingham before a Jury) all ignored. However I will only submit 3 lots total 7 pages in hard copy printed on both sides, for the environment. The rest will be on disc should the Lord/Lady Justices require the lot. These letters are statements of truth and nothing but the truth so help me! All ignored as if due process does not apply to HM’s Judges. How biased is that? I remind the current 6 HHJs of the Magna Carta principles that everyone is subject to the law even the judiciary and guarantees the rights of individuals the right to justice and the right to a fair trial. Clearly this does not apply to HHJs as they wreak vengeances on Mr Browne
  8. Letter to Hellman seeking clarification ignored as usual no surprise there. I must be kept out of my own case at the behest of Hellman! Ignored, bias
  9. ***Copy of letter from defendant’s agent page 2&1 agreeing that the case be heard in Nottingham. “there is no good reason to take this case to London” he also agrees a jury trial is right “Is a jury in London any more or less biased against the police than one in Nottingham” HHJ Freeland ignores this and all evidence the shows his judgment is bogus.
  10. ***Copy orders a hearing 01/02/2019 that never took place, claimant not informed, no costs awarded. How biased is that?

***Copy order of DJ Fine dated 09/05/19. The application (singular) be listed etc. before a HHJ to be advised. How biased is that?

***Copy order of HHJ Hellman 13/06/2019 listing two applications to be heard together. No hearing set down. Case almost 6 Years old. How biased is that?

***Copy order dated 25/06/2019 “Take notice the application (singular) hearing will take place on 18/10/19. Preceded by letter dated12/07/19 from the court

***Now another HHJ dropped in: Copy order of HHJ Saggerson 15/08/2019 “List all outstanding application (singular) 18/10/2019. What am I to make of this? How is that for bias. See letter asking for clarification

  1. ***Copy of the order of HHJ Freeland 18/10/2019 that is clearly bogus, the subject of this appeal to the CAC. This was the result of over 6 years judicial stalling as no HHJ was prepared to hear this substantive case and this order is discrimination and bias in no uncertain terms in the hope the claimant will give up and let these Judges steal my money. Already costing Mr Browne the claimant over £6345 in fees alone. All stolen by HMCT service. Designed to get the claimant to give up to avoid a hearing of the matter. How biased is that?
  2. Copy of the claimant’s application to dismiss the defendant’s application to set aside the substantive claim 3YQ10123 that is 6 years old and never been set down or heard even now @ a fee of £255. How biased is that?
  3. Copy of the claimant’s application to transfer the entire matter to Nottingham before a Jury @ a fee of £255. This would be the obvious right thing to do in the circumstances. How is that for extreme bias.
  4. This would put the blame where it rightly belongs and Justice would be done by a Jury. The writer knows right from wrong and this order is wrong and HHJ Freeland knows it, but he chooses to lie to protect HHJ Godsmark
  5. Now another group of orders Copy order of DDJ Freeman transferring 3YQ10123 matter to Central London County Court. Copy order of DJ Silverman transferring the matter to Nottingham. Copy order of HHJ Godsmark transferring it back to Central London County Court. How is that for delaying tactics! Pure and simple Bias as this case must never be heard as it involves HHJ Godsmark in Malfeasance and conspiracy. As he has used his status to avoid a hearing and kept my money fee of £395 for 6 years plus. How biased is that?
  6. ***Pages 5/6 of transcript before HHJ Godsmark at non listed matter, and matter swept under the carpet. How biased is that?
  7. Copy of the listings for that day. No listing for 3YQ10123
  8. This is damning no matter what criteria used and is indisputable proof of discrimination (bias) and a complete denial of “Access to Justice” “HRA”, “Equality Act” inter alia! How biased is that!
  9. Letter to Godsmark reinstating 3YQ10123 very dusty from under the carpet where devoid of conscious HHJ Godsmark placed it months previously to avoid a hearing. Ignored as usual. No hearing took place at any time regardless!
  10. This matter 3YQ10123 started as a mere money claim in Salford, then to Northampton DDJ Freeman (copy) then to London before DJ Silverman(copy) then to Nottingham HHJ Godsmark (copy) letter to Silverman objecting to Nottingham transfer ignored as usual, then to DDJ Wrigley (copy)Nottingham. Order by Godsmark transferring the Wrigley matter back to London(copy) then to HHJ Dight(copy) then to Hellman(copy) London then to Freeland(copy) then to DJ Fine(copy) then to Saggerson(copy) then back to Freeland (copy) where his order endeavours to sweeping the entire matter under the carpet official, copying HHJ Godsmark on 06/08/2014. This is due process according to HHJ Godsmark & now by HHJ Freeland, how biased is that
  11. Three orders involved in this debarcle that are bizarre to say the least. Salford to Northampton where DDJ Freeman orders it to London, London DJ Silverman orders it to Nottingham, HHJ Godsmark orders it back to London. All these transfers were done without any reference to the claimant whatsoever. How biased is that?
  12. Letter to Godsmark recovering the 3YQ10123 matter from under the carpet on the floor of Godsmark’s bench where Godsmark swept it on 06/08/2014. His explanation is absurd, the matter was never listed and nobody knows this better than Godsmark, as he continues his vendetta against J K Browne
  13. Letter to London court dated 28/09/2013 ignored again, this is not due process. How is that for bias?
  14. Letter to defendant dated 16/02/2014. Ignored with impunity. No surprise there. All my letters over 6 years are ignored. Justice is not available to me and my human rights are spit on by our esteemed Judiciary!
  15. Letter to defendant16/03/2012
  16. Bias definition

I now require a hearing before 3 Lord/Lady Justices that I will attend regardless of my problem getting there. As this case is over 6 years old there was a lot more statements and exhibits. Should there be any further questions that the CAC would like to ask, they should not hesitate to contract the undersigned. The writer is fully aware that there might be a conflict of interest before the Honourable Lord/Lady Justices and they might not want to hear this case, this been the case would the CAC send back the bundles and importantly my £528 court fee, that is still retained by the CAC, and I will see exactly what I need to do next.

The undersigned is fully aware of the repetitive

nature of this narrative however this is necessary due to the seriousness of the case and the involvement of HHJs of the brotherhood and that means the CAC may have a conflict of interest that their oath of office requires them to ignore as they are duty bound to be impartial. The bundles will be returned to the CAC w/c 06/01/2020. All the above is proved in the 4 authenticated bundles

Signed…………………………………………….05/11/2019

John Kenneth Browne

When responding, please give PAGE NUMBER & Line number.

Please note that this is a very serious matter and involves the honesty and integrity of our Judiciary, as such must be dealt with by the law Lords as they are impartial Justices at the CAC.

I make no apologies for the repetition in this narrative as 10 years is a long time to be fighting for justice in our courts, and it requires constant repetition to get “Access to Justice” and stop the deliberate prevarication that has lasted over 6 years in this case alone.

I now rely on the honesty, integrity and the impartially of our senior Judges in the Civil Appeals Court. Unfortunately the solidarity of the brotherhood may result in malfeasance. In this circumstance what will the Justices decide? May I please have an order from the Justices in order to move this matter forward to a conclusion?

J K Browne

Attached: Four 4 exhibits that proves Judicial Bias and an abuse of the process by the very people who are paid and sworn to uphold.

  1. Transcript of unlisted hearing before HHJ Godsmark, when 3YQ10123 is swept under the carpet in Godsmark’s room never to be seen again and my £395 in effect stolen.
  2. Actual listing for that day. No mention of 3YQ10123
  3. Order of Godsmark in the High Court that registry at CAC want me to appeal to, this is bias itself by the CAC.
  4. List of Judges involved in this debarcle presided over by HHJ Godsmark. In the previous case, a mere money claim, J K Browne is hit with over £100,000 costs by guess who, HHJ Godsmark who is clearly obsessed with vengeance against Mr Browne to the point of paranoid

PLEASE NOTE PRINTED ON BOTH SIDES WHERE APPLICABLE

This case 2019/P1/12356 must be heard at the Justices at the CAC

as HHJ Godsmark the architect of this 6 year old fiasco and travesty of Justice also sits as a High Court Judge at Nottingham who the associates at the CAC advocate should hear this appeal, this is quite irrational as he has shown actual bias, abuse of Judicial discretion, abuse of Court power in effect malfeasance to the claimant J K Browne many times over the past 8 years, in effect there is no alternative to a CAC Justices hearing and the CAC has direct jurisdiction, to claim otherwise is the subvert and pervert due process and a definite attempt to prevaricate this matter as if 6 years is not enough? see transcript attached before HHJ Godsmark that is also in the 4 bundles ignored by the CAC as is a list of Judges involved in another case before Godsmark and the judges involved in this matter already presented to the CAC. Please note HHJ Godsmark involved throughout both cases.

The correct procedure is simple, A DDJ, DJ is accountable to a circuit Judge(HHJ) who is accountable to the CAC, and in certain exceptional cases to the High Court that was not involved in the case at any time due to the potential of bias. The CAC/High Court are accountable to the Supreme Court. Primarily all are accountable to their oath of office, their impartiality is imperative as the bedrock of our legal system. Litigants must be able to trust our Judges. Unfortunately the Judges involved in this case have cast all this aside in favour of solidarity with the brotherhood. The HHJs have handed down the case to a DJ Fine. In effect they must be impeached. Otherwise they are a law onto themselves and can no longer be trusted.

Proof: If that is not enough proof of bias there is more, this case started in London, HHJ Godsmark ordered it via DJ Silverman to Nottingham where Godsmark buried it never to be seen again or so he thought! I revived this from under the carpet in Godsmark’s private room in June 2017, see reviving letter, again ignored! Godsmark is devoid of conscious! As a result when this failed he ordered it back to London where it was stalled for a further 3 years. How blatantly biased is that. However if that is not enough proof I now provide further evidence of dishonesty and fraud by Godsmark. On 27th June before Godsmark in his capacity as a High Court Judge the case against me was dismissed and I was awarded costs to be assessed if not agreed. I duly made application for same to SCCO only to be told that this application had been transferred to Nottingham for assessment in order that Godsmark could sit in Judgement on himself, when it got to Nottingham it was again buried under the carpet never to be seen again, such arrogance, I had paid £369 court fee for this assessment that was not refunded regardless of my money claim to Salford for same! This money is still outstanding 5 years later! How biased is that? Copy order enclosed. I now have to conclude that the CAC has joined this conspiracy to deny “access to Justice and Human rights to the claimant J K Browne.

Please confirm that this is not true!!?? Now the CAC sends my 4 bundles back with no order and no transfer order this is a clear attempt to continue the prevarication of HHJs Godsmark, Freeland, Hellman, Saggerson, DJ Fine and Freeland for the second time when he dismisses case no 3YQ10123 dated 01/08/2013 with a wave of his hand and 2 applications from the claimant, my application for a transcript of same is ignored, how biased is that?

These 4 bundles 2019/P1/12356 well within the time limit 18/11/2019, the delay is caused by the CAC as it endeavours to avoid a hearing by very devious means as this is an open and shut case. The bundles will now be returned to the CAC for an adjudication and a CAC order before 3 Lord/Lady Justices in January 2020 to be set down ASAP, the fee of £528 already paid and cashed has not been refunded as at 06/01/2020 over 6 weeks later. Does the CAC intend to misappropriate this money. The CAC must retain the £528 and be used for it’s original purpose to pay for the adjudication hearing and order 2019/P1/12356, this is my inalienable right to “access to Justice” not able to be given or taken away because of being protected by statue, to be set down asap in January 2020.

Attachment: Continuing support for Appellant Notice no 2019/P1/12356.

Appeal to the Civil Appeals Court already submitted number 2019/P1/12356 dated 05/11/2019 against order of HHJ Freeland 18/10.2019 in relation to County Court case no 3YQ10123 dated 01/08/2013, stalled for over 6 years by HHJs Nigel Godsmark (ring leader and chair of the brotherhood and Grand master) Simon Freeland, Stephen Hellman, Alan Saggerson, DJ Ruth Fine and GGH Simon Freeman (for the second time) this is not protocol or due process and an abuse of the process, abuse of judicial discretion and abuse of Court power! Such arrogance is unbelievable! It is not possible to trust them to be impartial! In effect they are dishonest and devoid of conscious, is his endemic?

All of the order of HHJ Simon Freeland (enclosed) be rescinded forthwith, as it is not due process and is an abuse of the process discretion and Court power. As, it is based entirely on discrimination (bias) against the claimant!

Equality Act 2010 violations The Equality Act became law in 2010. It covers everyone in Britain and protects people from discrimination, harassment and victimisation.

Human Rights Act violations, In the determining the civil rights of the claimant in this case the Judges failed to take account of article 6 of the HRA. Everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time, over 6 years is not reasonable no matter what criteria used!

Overriding Objective The overriding objective expressly says that the court has to seek to give effect to it when exercising any powers given by the rules or interpreting any rules. But in every other case, whether using its powers or deciding what the rules mean, the court has to take account of the overriding objective.

Access to Justice 1999 violations: Access to justice is a right not a privilege and as such cannot be interpreted to mean anything else. In that regard it will play an important part in helping to maintain the courts commitment to access to Justice as a right available to all. Lord Dyson Master ot the rolls 11th December 2012. This enables people to exercise their rights, challenge discrimination or hold decision-makers to account..

These Acts of Parliament are ignored by HHJs Simon Freeland, Nigel Graham Godsmark who also sits as a High Court Judge, Stephen Godfrey Hellman, Alan Saggerson, & DJ Ruth Fine and I now appeal to the CAC to adjudicate on this entire matter.

HHJ Freeland and others ignore the evidence of 6 years prevaricating to avoid hearing this open and shut case that included over 80 letters each one requesting a transfer to Nottingham before a JURY and got no reply. My rights are spit on and my money claim to Salford for the refund of the fee £395 received no response, went to a hearing before DDJ Wrigley who negated my claim, and awarded costs. I made application to set aside same only to find that High Court Judge Godsmark now transfers this case and 3YQ10123 back to London with no explanation, needless to say the Wrigley order was upheld by HHJ Dight. No surprise there. The 3YQ10123 was stalled again until 18/10/2019 when HHJ Freeland presided over a kangaroo court where the application of the defendant is given priority and favour, and the claimants application to dismiss the defendants dishonest application ignored and dismissed as usual. And the claimant’s second application to transfer the 3YQ10123 matter to Nottingham before a JURY is dismissed ignored and my fee money £395 stolen by HHJ Freeland, who’s order is riddled with bias in every line and every word and nobody is more aware of this than HHJ Freeland himself. The rule of law is ignored, all equal before the law is ignored, as is the Magna Carta that is still in force. The rule on recusal ignored, HRA 1989, Universal Declaration on human rights 1948 inter alia, ignored. HHJ Freeland ignored all the evidence against the defendant that was overwhelming including over 80 statements of truth that are self-evident and numerous exhibits that were all ignored by biased HHJ Freeland and other HHJs. As a result of this bias I have claimed since 01/08/2013 that I am a victim of corruption by HHJ Godsmark of Nottingham supported by HHJs Hellman, Freeland, Saggerson, DJ Fine and Freeland whose order is proof of bias, now read on for further proof of bias!

The claimant is well aware that there is the possibility of “conflict of interest” in the Lord/Lady Justices. From the start of this case 3YQ10123 01/08/2013 the knifes were out for J K Browne by the Judiciary, in effect they have changed the essence of the case in so far as the title is concerned, it is now “HHJs Godsmark, Hellman, Freeland, Saggerson and Freeland again and DJ Ruth Fine against J K Browne! I can only hope that the Justices will be impartial enough to insure that the Judiciary involved are held to account for this malfeasance. And this appeal be granted with costs. There is no doubt that the claimant has been subjected to discrimination, intimidation and bullying and since 01/08/2013 the date of the initial claim and no hearing to date has been set down.

J K Browne has suffered from the effects of this hostile environment for over 6 years created by these HHJs, and the 80 unanswered letters and the clearly ignored the indisputable evidence against the defendant. How biased is that?

ALL of my 80 letters to Hellman from 01.08.2013 to date contained a request to transfer the entire matter to Nottingham before a Jury, and this was supported by the defendant’s copy letter enclosed. Due to bias, access to justice is not available to me in the County Court. Nottingham is where all the parties involved including my chief witness HHJ Godsmark are based & domiciled. Re my application to transfer the entire matter logically to Nottingham making common sense in terms of a whole day wasted in London to say nothing of traveling expenses compared with just a few hours in Nottingham where the claimant could attend. However as per usual Mr Browne a litigant in person must be penalised victimised demonised by the afore mentioned Judiciary in every way possible by order of HHJ Godsmark who involves himself in every aspect of every case in which I am involved. His obsession is associated with a psychiatric disorder.

 

It must be remembered that the case was correctly in London at the start of this case, but HHJ Godsmark surreptitiously ordered the matter transferred to Nottingham, contrary to my Claim form request for the matter to be heard in London due to bias in Nottingham, he later in an entirely different case hearing touched on the matter 3YQ10123 that was not listed, when advised of same he swept the entire matter under the carpet to avoid a hearing, the case was clear cut, but Mr Browne must not be allowed to win anything by order of HHJ Godsmark. At this point it begs the question, why is HHJ Godsmark involving himself in every aspect of every case in which Mr Browne is a litigant. He appears to be making the issue “personal”. However it gets worse!

Having failed to see me off, he surreptitiously transfers the entire matter back to London for personal reasons and as such this is not protocol or due process no matter what criteria used, but deliberate bias! What else could it be? This is done again surreptitiously with no reference or advisement to the claimant whatsoever? My objection to the hearing in London is also ignored, due to an unnecessary waste of time and expense. The defendant had the right to have the case heard in Nottingham but was ordered to London by HHJ Godsmark to deprive the claimant of “access to Justice” 1999 and his human rights “HRA 1989” and the Equality Act inter alia, to say nothing of the hate campaign run by HHJ Godsmark since 2003. HHJ Freeland totally ignored the “overriding objective” one of which was that costs be kept to a minimum instead of which HHJ Freeland went for the maximum at the request of the defendant. HHJ Freeland had already proved to be biased against the claimant previously so I expected there will be favour and partiality for the defendant and the outcome assured. In effect a kangaroo court. This proved to be true, see the order of partial HHJ Freeland as he tries to hit Mr.Browne with nearly £4000 costs that are disproportionate to say the least and the claimant is not allowed an assessment to question this injustice. How biased is that? Mr Browne must not be allowed to win anything no matter what! The effort, energy and fortitude that these judges put in to see Mr Browne off is criminal to say the least.

It also must be noted that the court fee of £395 for this claim paid on 01.08.13 was for a hearing that was never set down at any time so the fee was returnable, regardless of numerous requests this fee was misappropriated. DDJ Wrigley under instructions from Godsmark lied from the bench as did Godsmark on a previous occasion. Is there no end to the malfeasance and obsessive nature of HHJ Godsmark as he wreaks personal vengeance on Mr Browne.

At this point the discrimination and the malfeasance of all the Judges involved is indefensible. Namely HHJ Godsmark (the chair and grand master of the Brotherhood) the main instigator of this debacle and hate campaign (hate Act) in order to avenge DJ Reeson, explanation later, DDJ Wrigley, HHJ Dight, HHJ Freeland, HHJ Hellman, DJ Fine, HHJ Saggerson and now HHJ Freeland again. This amounts to a misuse of judicial discretion and misuse of Court power, in effect a judicial conspiracy, defrauding the claimant in order for HHJ Godsmark to pursue his personal and most virulent hate campaign against Mr Browne and using the brotherhood solidarity of which he is the chair and grand master, to oblige other Judges to breach their oath of office to support him! They must ignore the “overriding objectives CPR part 1.2”. These are the facts that are indisputable and the named Judges are fully aware of this but they have their instructions and obligations to HHJ Godsmark as the chairman of the brotherhood and Grand Master.

I now proceed to the chronology of this matter

1) Claim made in Salford County Court money claim centre on 01/08/2013 with instruction for a London hearing, due to discrimination experienced and proved in Nottingham before HHJ Godsmark.

2) Matter transferred to Northampton before DDJ Freeman who duly transfers the case correctly to London

3) London DJ Silverman processes this claim in the normal way for some time until unbelievably

4) HHJ Godsmark Nottingham applies to Silverman London to have the case transferred to Nottingham this was done surreptitiously without reference to the claimant, not protocol. Misuse judicial discretion and court power leaving J K Browne at the mercy of Biased HHJ Godsmark and that was quick in coming. Rights denied!

5) I write letters to Silverman objecting to this transfer as it is not due process! As it denies the claimant of his rights, that are ignored, it appears I am not to get “access to Justice 1999”

6) The matter is now in Nottingham before HHJ Godsmark and there is nothing I can do, on 06/08/14 bias HHJ Godsmark touches on this case 3YQ10123 that was not listed, in an entirely different matter. When advised HHJ Godsmark of this fact he swept the entire matter under the carpet never to be seen again, or so he thought!

7) I reinstate the case 3YQ10123 in a letter to Godsmark and request a hearing of the matter before a JURY to resolve the matter. This letter is ignored as usual. Clearly, I am “persona non grata” before HHJ Godsmark as he is clearly obsessed to the point of paranoia as he pursues this vendetta against the Claimant on behalf DJ Reeson a fellow member of the brotherhood

8) As a result of Godsmark’s intransigence by ignoring the evidence and sweeping it under the carpet and leaving me in limbo I decide to issue a money claim to Salford for the return of the £395 court fee for 3YQ10123 01.08.13 that was never heard or adjudicated on, and no order issued and just swept under the carpet of HHJ Godsmark bench and as such I was at least entitled to a refund.

9) This caused an implausible reaction from the Court as it refuting my claim and issued a devious defence. This resulted in a hearing before DDJ Wrigley who rejected my claim by saying that this had nothing to do with HHJ Godsmark, clearly it had everything to do with Godsmark, clearly DDJ Wrigley as a junior Judge was taking his instructions from Godsmark. During this so called hearing DDJ Wrigley referred to DJ Reeson, unprompted, as a much respected Judge in the Nottingham Brotherhood where HHJ Godsmark is chair and grand-master. The order is an exhibit.

10) This left me with no choice so I made an application to Nottingham to set Wrigley’s order aside with justifiable grounds. Now for the big surprise of all! Unbelievably

11) There is an order from Godsmark transferring the substantive significate case 3YQ10123 dated 01.08.2013 and the setting aside of the order of Wrigley back to London. Godsmark is using his status to divert the matter away from himself by any means at his disposal as the HHJ Godsmark is devoid of conscious, integrity and common decency! This was done surreptitiously as usual! I was never consulted and was presented with a fait accompli as usual. This is not due process it is abuse of the process by a HHJ who is operating a personal vengeance against Mr Browne on behalf of DJ Reeson.

12) Now the matter is incredible back in London and there is nothing I can do except keep fighting for JUSTICE before an honest and impartial Judge if I can find one. What next I ask myself, the matter is now 5 years old and no resolution in sight. On 05/10/2018 HHJ Hellman makes an order that there will be a CCMC arranged before HHJ Freeland after 28 days.

13) On the 22/10/18 a hearing is set down for 2pm 01/02/19 this hearing was cancelled as without merit on the Courts own volition, without any notice to me and my costs were refused. This is a travesty of justice

14) Now I have an order from DJ Fine 09/05/19 stating that the application of the defendant, this is the first time I was made aware of any application, Is this some kind of ambush by a consortium of Judges to deprive the claimant of his rights to a fair trial before an impartial Judge within a reasonable time as per the HRA provisions. This hearing did not take place either. How biased is that?

15) Now the so called solicitor for the defendant issues an application to cancel the substantive significant case 3YQ10123 dated 01/08/2013 that has never been heard or set down for a hearing. Just swept under the carpet in HHJ Godsmark bench. This is quite absurd and there is no justification or evidence for this application is to be ignored or does this man know something I do not, i.e. the biased Judge has decided to advise the defendant that he will find for him regardless (in effect a kangaroo court). The overwhelming evidence and over 80 letters and exhibits including the Claim form dated 01/08/2013 and requests for Judgment will be ignored by order of HHJ Freeland. The Judges ignore the lot as usual!

16) I decide to issue an application refuting this attempt to pervert the course of Justice, ignored as usual. The order confirms that my application was ignored upon receipt. Three copies were sent to the court as required; one sealed copy must be returned to me, this did not happen and my court fee of £255 was misappropriated. So protocol was ignored again to deprive Mr Browne of his rights to be advised of this wrong doing.

The first I knew that the Court had received my application was the order of HHJ Hellman 13/06/2019 and my cheque dated 21/05/2019 for the fee was cashed on 24/05/19. No further communication was received from the Court.

17) I was now aware that an ambush was planned and I was heading to a kangaroo court as per usual. I now issue a further application in order to try and stop this injustice. I requested a transfer of the entire matter to Nottingham before a JURY as I had repeated in every one of my 80 letters since 01/08/2013 all of which were ignored with no explaination. This application dated 26/06/19 fee paid £255 cheque no 133 cashed 29/06/19 had 3 copies as required and one sealed copy was returned to me. My bank statements confirm that my cheques for these fees were cashed.

18) Now I have an order from HHJ Hellman and I quote “Take note that the application (singular) will take place on” 18.10.19. Please note it does not mention which application, was it the defendants only that would have not surprised me, as there were three but the claimant was not advised. How biased is that!

19) I wrote a letter to Hellman asking for clarification as to which application is to be heard on 18/10/19. No reply was received as usual. My assessment of this dereliction of normal behaviour convinced me that I was to be ignored no matter what and a kangaroo court was set for the 18.10.19 so the outcome would be the same whether I attended or not.

20) On the 15/08/19 I received a further order this time from HHJ Saggerson, this order is deliberately vague with intent to deceive “it is ordered that “list all outstanding application(singular)18/10/19” and sealed. What is it possible to deduce from such an order. The list of applications are or should be already on file but the claimant must not be informed. How is that for Bias!

21) Now the court drops in another Judge HHJ Freeland for the second time, who has been shown as biased and partial previously is now selected to see Mr Browne off with summarily assessed costs with no opportunity to challenge, again par for the course. Had the matter been heard in Nottingham the costs would be 26% of the costs awarded. So this is contrary to the provisions of the “Overriding Objective” to keep costs to a minimum inter alia. I have applied to Freeland for permission to appeal and got no reply, no surprise there. I can only hope that this conspiracy is confined to the lower courts and the Lord/Lady Justices are above this kind of stratagem and can be relied on for an impartial adjudication and a subsequent order for same in due course.

22) Before proceeding on to the biased order itself I made the following comment:

Comment: We expect our judges to be Honourable Principled Moral Ethical honest and wise and above all impartial. Their integrity and impartiality are the bedrock of the entire judicial system. We trust them to ensure fair trials and protect the rights of all litigants’. We expect them to peruse the evidence and purely on the evidence to make a fair Judgment. We expect them to respect fundamental basic Human Rights, ECHR, and HRA, Create a level playing field. To treat litigants in person as described in the “Hand Book for litigants in Person co-written by two of the offending judges in this matter. HHJ Hampton & HHJ Peter Bower. I know I am the victim of corrupt judges in the County Court at Nottingham and Central Court at London. I am confident I can prove this to be the case before impartial Justices at the CAC or a Jury at Nottingham. End of comment.

23) I now come to the order of HHJ Freeland who is sitting on an interlocutory application and substituting it for the substantive significant and crucial case number 3YQ10123 dated 01/08/2013 over 6 years old and now diverts it into an interlocutory application by the defendant, at the same time he dismisses my 2 applications at a cost of £510 as if they did not exist. How biased is that! In effect he did the same as HHJ Godsmark did on 06/08/2014 in an effort to see Mr Browne off. How biased is that!

24) Part one of said order states that the defendants bundle was sent on the 11/10/19 this is as maybe however I did not receive this until midday on 17/10/19. Regardless of this I am expected to respond to this false witness in a day or even a couple of days. All ignored by HHJ Freeland.

25) Part two of the order claims that HHJ Saggerson directed that all applications were to be heard on 18/10/2019. I have no hesitation in accusing HHJ Freeland of blatant lying. I have the order of Saggerson to prove it. In effect the plural was not used at any time on any order. How biased is that?

26) HHJ Freeland only reads the defendants bundle and ignored the 80 plus letters sent to Hellman by Fax, email and Royal Mail recording delivery requesting transfer to Nottingham before a Jury due to bias shown by HHJs Godsmark, Hellman, Freeland, Saggerson Fine and again Freeland that included indisputable evidence over a 6 year period including the claim form itself and subsequent requests for Judgement as the defendant did not comply with the due process, all ignored by Salford who has now joined the conspiracy. How is that for bias! Due to this I know it would not have made any difference whether I attended this hearing or not as this was a kangaroo court and the outcome was predictable!.

27) Now it is ordered.

  1. Unbelievable Staples invokes the Human rights act. He deliberately avoids article 6, 7, inter alia that states I am entitled to a trial before an impartial Judge within a reasonable time, it is six years since my claim 01/08/2013 and still not set down for a substantive hearing even yet before a Jury due to discrimination chicanery sophistry and every other devise these Judges can come up with to see Mr Browne off and his money stolen by perverting the course of Justice
  2. The length of time is over 6 years stalled by the Judges not the claimant. But the fact that he claims partiality from HHJ Freeland comes as no surprise. How is that for bias?
  3. This is further proof that my 6 years old claim has never been heard, regardless of the biased current bogus order of HHJ Freeland

28) I now claim bias against all the Judges involved in this 3YQ10123 and HHJ Freeland and the other Judges involved must withdraw themselves, and instigate a Jury trial in Nottingham without any further delay. This is my wish to the Justices of the CAC, the HHJs fear such a hearing as they have used subterfuge chicanery sophistry to avoid same due to the solidarity of the brotherhood. How biased is that!

29) I now come to the exhibits that are indisputable. Case no 3YQ10123

  1. Appellants Notice
  2. Continuing support for appellants notice
  3. Copy of original claim form dated 01/08/2013 for compensation for police brutality, it also contained instructions that the hearing be in London due to bias in Nottingham.
  4. Grounds for making this claim in a comprehensive report on the assault by the police on Mr Browne that involved the illegal use of CS totally unnecessary and uncalled for!
  5. List of 3 police officers involved in this assault. Causing post dramatic stress disorder to Mr Browne. PLUS 8 officers involved in the closing of ranks and the lies they invented. There are photos of my injuries and 2 doctor’s reports. HHJ Freeland was fully aware of all these facts but he decided to ignore the lot. How biased is that?
  6. Request for Judgement (ignored) due to no response of any kind from the defendant to this legitimate official money claim. How biased is that?
  7. There is at least 80 letters to Hellman (transfer to Nottingham before a Jury) all ignored. However I will only submit 3 lots total 7 pages in hard copy printed on both sides, for the environment. The rest will be on disc should the Lord/Lady Justices require the lot. These letters are statements of truth and nothing but the truth so help me! All ignored as if due process does not apply to HM’s Judges. How biased is that? I remind the current 6 HHJs of the Magna Carta principles that everyone is subject to the law even the judiciary and guarantees the rights of individuals the right to justice and the right to a fair trial. Clearly this does not apply to HHJs as they wreak vengeances on Mr Browne
  8. Letter to Hellman seeking clarification ignored as usual no surprise there. I must be kept out of my own case at the behest of Hellman! Ignored, bias
  9. ***Copy of letter from defendant’s agent page 2&1 agreeing that the case be heard in Nottingham. “there is no good reason to take this case to London” he also agrees a jury trial is right “Is a jury in London any more or less biased against the police than one in Nottingham” HHJ Freeland ignores this and all evidence the shows his judgment is bogus.
  10. ***Copy orders a hearing 01/02/2019 that never took place, claimant not informed, no costs awarded. How biased is that?

***Copy order of DJ Fine dated 09/05/19. The application (singular) be listed etc. before a HHJ to be advised. How biased is that?

***Copy order of HHJ Hellman 13/06/2019 listing two applications to be heard together. No hearing set down. Case almost 6 Years old. How biased is that?

***Copy order dated 25/06/2019 “Take notice the application (singular) hearing will take place on 18/10/19. Preceded by letter dated12/07/19 from the court

***Now another HHJ dropped in: Copy order of HHJ Saggerson 15/08/2019 “List all outstanding application (singular) 18/10/2019. What am I to make of this? How is that for bias. See letter asking for clarification

  1. ***Copy of the order of HHJ Freeland 18/10/2019 that is clearly bogus, the subject of this appeal to the CAC. This was the result of over 6 years judicial stalling as no HHJ was prepared to hear this substantive case and this order is discrimination and bias in no uncertain terms in the hope the claimant will give up and let these Judges steal my money. Already costing Mr Browne the claimant over £6345 in fees alone. All stolen by HMCT service. Designed to get the claimant to give up to avoid a hearing of the matter. How biased is that?
  2. Copy of the claimant’s application to dismiss the defendant’s application to set aside the substantive claim 3YQ10123 that is 6 years old and never been set down or heard even now @ a fee of £255. How biased is that?
  3. Copy of the claimant’s application to transfer the entire matter to Nottingham before a Jury @ a fee of £255. This would be the obvious right thing to do in the circumstances. How is that for extreme bias.
  4. This would put the blame where it rightly belongs and Justice would be done by a Jury. The writer knows right from wrong and this order is wrong and HHJ Freeland knows it, but he chooses to lie to protect HHJ Godsmark
  5. Now another group of orders Copy order of DDJ Freeman transferring 3YQ10123 matter to Central London County Court. Copy order of DJ Silverman transferring the matter to Nottingham. Copy order of HHJ Godsmark transferring it back to Central London County Court. How is that for delaying tactics! Pure and simple Bias as this case must never be heard as it involves HHJ Godsmark in Malfeasance and conspiracy. As he has used his status to avoid a hearing and kept my money fee of £395 for 6 years plus. How biased is that?
  6. ***Pages 5/6 of transcript before HHJ Godsmark at non listed matter, and matter swept under the carpet. How biased is that?
  7. Copy of the listings for that day. No listing for 3YQ10123
  8. This is damning no matter what criteria used and is indisputable proof of discrimination (bias) and a complete denial of “Access to Justice” “HRA”, “Equality Act” inter alia! How biased is that!
  9. Letter to Godsmark reinstating 3YQ10123 very dusty from under the carpet where devoid of conscious HHJ Godsmark placed it months previously to avoid a hearing. Ignored as usual. No hearing took place at any time regardless!
  10. This matter 3YQ10123 started as a mere money claim in Salford, then to Northampton DDJ Freeman (copy) then to London before DJ Silverman(copy) then to Nottingham HHJ Godsmark (copy) letter to Silverman objecting to Nottingham transfer ignored as usual, then to DDJ Wrigley (copy)Nottingham. Order by Godsmark transferring the Wrigley matter back to London(copy) then to HHJ Dight(copy) then to Hellman(copy) London then to Freeland(copy) then to DJ Fine(copy) then to Saggerson(copy) then back to Freeland (copy) where his order endeavours to sweeping the entire matter under the carpet official, copying HHJ Godsmark on 06/08/2014. This is due process according to HHJ Godsmark & now by HHJ Freeland, how biased is that
  11. Three orders involved in this debarcle that are bizarre to say the least. Salford to Northampton where DDJ Freeman orders it to London, London DJ Silverman orders it to Nottingham, HHJ Godsmark orders it back to London. All these transfers were done without any reference to the claimant whatsoever. How biased is that?
  12. Letter to Godsmark recovering the 3YQ10123 matter from under the carpet on the floor of Godsmark’s bench where Godsmark swept it on 06/08/2014. His explanation is absurd, the matter was never listed and nobody knows this better than Godsmark, as he continues his vendetta against J K Browne
  13. Letter to London court dated 28/09/2013 ignored again, this is not due process. How is that for bias?
  14. Letter to defendant dated 16/02/2014. Ignored with impunity. No surprise there. All my letters over 6 years are ignored. Justice is not available to me and my human rights are spit on by our esteemed Judiciary!
  15. Letter to defendant16/03/2012
  16. Bias definition

I now require a hearing before 3 Lord/Lady Justices that I will attend regardless of my problem getting there. As this case is over 6 years old there was a lot more statements and exhibits. Should there be any further questions that the CAC would like to ask, they should not hesitate to contract the undersigned. The writer is fully aware that there might be a conflict of interest before the Honourable Lord/Lady Justices and they might not want to hear this case, this been the case would the CAC send back the bundles and importantly my £528 court fee, that is still retained by the CAC, and I will see exactly what I need to do next.

The undersigned is fully aware of the repetitive

nature of this narrative however this is necessary due to the seriousness of the case and the involvement of HHJs of the brotherhood and that means the CAC may have a conflict of interest that their oath of office requires them to ignore as they are duty bound to be impartial. The bundles will be returned to the CAC w/c 06/01/2020. All the above is proved in the 4 authenticated bundles

Signed…………………………………………….05/11/2019

John Kenneth Browne

When responding, please give PAGE NUMBER & Line number.

Please note that this is a very serious matter and involves the honesty and integrity of our Judiciary, as such must be dealt with by the law Lords as they are impartial Justices at the CAC.

I make no apologies for the repetition in this narrative as 10 years is a long time to be fighting for justice in our courts, and it requires constant repetition to get “Access to Justice” and stop the deliberate prevarication that has lasted over 6 years in this case alone.

I now rely on the honesty, integrity and the impartially of our senior Judges in the Civil Appeals Court. Unfortunately the solidarity of the brotherhood may result in malfeasance. In this circumstance what will the Justices decide? May I please have an order from the Justices in order to move this matter forward to a conclusion?

J K Browne

Attached: Four 4 exhibits that proves Judicial Bias and an abuse of the process by the very people who are paid and sworn to uphold.

  1. Transcript of unlisted hearing before HHJ Godsmark, when 3YQ10123 is swept under the carpet in Godsmark’s room never to be seen again and my £395 in effect stolen.
  2. Actual listing for that day. No mention of 3YQ10123
  3. Order of Godsmark in the High Court that registry at CAC want me to appeal to, this is bias itself by the CAC.
  4. List of Judges involved in this debarcle presided over by HHJ Godsmark. In the previous case, a mere money claim, J K Browne is hit with over £100,000 costs by guess who, HHJ Godsmark who is clearly obsessed with vengeance against Mr Browne to the point of paranoid

PLEASE NOTE PRINTED ON BOTH SIDES WHERE APPLICABLE

This case 2019/P1/12356 must be heard at the Justices at the CAC

as HHJ Godsmark the architect of this 6 year old fiasco and travesty of Justice also sits as a High Court Judge at Nottingham who the associates at the CAC advocate should hear this appeal, this is quite irrational as he has shown actual bias, abuse of Judicial discretion, abuse of Court power in effect malfeasance to the claimant J K Browne many times over the past 8 years, in effect there is no alternative to a CAC Justices hearing and the CAC has direct jurisdiction, to claim otherwise is the subvert and pervert due process and a definite attempt to prevaricate this matter as if 6 years is not enough? see transcript attached before HHJ Godsmark that is also in the 4 bundles ignored by the CAC as is a list of Judges involved in another case before Godsmark and the judges involved in this matter already presented to the CAC. Please note HHJ Godsmark involved throughout both cases.

The correct procedure is simple, A DDJ, DJ is accountable to a circuit Judge(HHJ) who is accountable to the CAC, and in certain exceptional cases to the High Court that was not involved in the case at any time due to the potential of bias. The CAC/High Court are accountable to the Supreme Court. Primarily all are accountable to their oath of office, their impartiality is imperative as the bedrock of our legal system. Litigants must be able to trust our Judges. Unfortunately the Judges involved in this case have cast all this aside in favour of solidarity with the brotherhood. The HHJs have handed down the case to a DJ Fine. In effect they must be impeached. Otherwise they are a law onto themselves and can no longer be trusted.

Proof: If that is not enough proof of bias there is more, this case started in London, HHJ Godsmark ordered it via DJ Silverman to Nottingham where Godsmark buried it never to be seen again or so he thought! I revived this from under the carpet in Godsmark’s private room in June 2017, see reviving letter, again ignored! Godsmark is devoid of conscious! As a result when this failed he ordered it back to London where it was stalled for a further 3 years. How blatantly biased is that. However if that is not enough proof I now provide further evidence of dishonesty and fraud by Godsmark. On 27th June before Godsmark in his capacity as a High Court Judge the case against me was dismissed and I was awarded costs to be assessed if not agreed. I duly made application for same to SCCO only to be told that this application had been transferred to Nottingham for assessment in order that Godsmark could sit in Judgement on himself, when it got to Nottingham it was again buried under the carpet never to be seen again, such arrogance, I had paid £369 court fee for this assessment that was not refunded regardless of my money claim to Salford for same! This money is still outstanding 5 years later! How biased is that? Copy order enclosed. I now have to conclude that the CAC has joined this conspiracy to deny “access to Justice and Human rights to the claimant J K Browne.

Please confirm that this is not true!!?? Now the CAC sends my 4 bundles back with no order and no transfer order this is a clear attempt to continue the prevarication of HHJs Godsmark, Freeland, Hellman, Saggerson, DJ Fine and Freeland for the second time when he dismisses case no 3YQ10123 dated 01/08/2013 with a wave of his hand and 2 applications from the claimant, my application for a transcript of same is ignored, how biased is that?

These 4 bundles 2019/P1/12356 well within the time limit 18/11/2019, the delay is caused by the CAC as it endeavours to avoid a hearing by very devious means as this is an open and shut case. The bundles will now be returned to the CAC for an adjudication and a CAC order before 3 Lord/Lady Justices in January 2020 to be set down ASAP, the fee of £528 already paid and cashed has not been refunded as at 06/01/2020 over 6 weeks later. Does the CAC intend to misappropriate this money. The CAC must retain the £528 and be used for it’s original purpose to pay for the adjudication hearing and order 2019/P1/12356, this is my inalienable right to “access to Justice” not able to be given or taken away because of being protected by statue, to be set down asap in January 2020.

Attachment: Continuing support for Appellant Notice no 2019/P1/12356.

Appeal to the Civil Appeals Court already submitted number 2019/P1/12356 dated 05/11/2019 against order of HHJ Freeland 18/10.2019 in relation to County Court case no 3YQ10123 dated 01/08/2013, stalled for over 6 years by HHJs Nigel Godsmark (ring leader and chair of the brotherhood and Grand master) Simon Freeland, Stephen Hellman, Alan Saggerson, DJ Ruth Fine and GGH Simon Freeman (for the second time) this is not protocol or due process and an abuse of the process, abuse of judicial discretion and abuse of Court power! Such arrogance is unbelievable! It is not possible to trust them to be impartial! In effect they are dishonest and devoid of conscious, is his endemic?

All of the order of HHJ Simon Freeland (enclosed) be rescinded forthwith, as it is not due process and is an abuse of the process discretion and Court power. As, it is based entirely on discrimination (bias) against the claimant!

Equality Act 2010 violations The Equality Act became law in 2010. It covers everyone in Britain and protects people from discrimination, harassment and victimisation.

Human Rights Act violations, In the determining the civil rights of the claimant in this case the Judges failed to take account of article 6 of the HRA. Everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time, over 6 years is not reasonable no matter what criteria used!

Overriding Objective The overriding objective expressly says that the court has to seek to give effect to it when exercising any powers given by the rules or interpreting any rules. But in every other case, whether using its powers or deciding what the rules mean, the court has to take account of the overriding objective.

Access to Justice 1999 violations: Access to justice is a right not a privilege and as such cannot be interpreted to mean anything else. In that regard it will play an important part in helping to maintain the courts commitment to access to Justice as a right available to all. Lord Dyson Master ot the rolls 11th December 2012. This enables people to exercise their rights, challenge discrimination or hold decision-makers to account..

These Acts of Parliament are ignored by HHJs Simon Freeland, Nigel Graham Godsmark who also sits as a High Court Judge, Stephen Godfrey Hellman, Alan Saggerson, & DJ Ruth Fine and I now appeal to the CAC to adjudicate on this entire matter.

HHJ Freeland and others ignore the evidence of 6 years prevaricating to avoid hearing this open and shut case that included over 80 letters each one requesting a transfer to Nottingham before a JURY and got no reply. My rights are spit on and my money claim to Salford for the refund of the fee £395 received no response, went to a hearing before DDJ Wrigley who negated my claim, and awarded costs. I made application to set aside same only to find that High Court Judge Godsmark now transfers this case and 3YQ10123 back to London with no explanation, needless to say the Wrigley order was upheld by HHJ Dight. No surprise there. The 3YQ10123 was stalled again until 18/10/2019 when HHJ Freeland presided over a kangaroo court where the application of the defendant is given priority and favour, and the claimants application to dismiss the defendants dishonest application ignored and dismissed as usual. And the claimant’s second application to transfer the 3YQ10123 matter to Nottingham before a JURY is dismissed ignored and my fee money £395 stolen by HHJ Freeland, who’s order is riddled with bias in every line and every word and nobody is more aware of this than HHJ Freeland himself. The rule of law is ignored, all equal before the law is ignored, as is the Magna Carta that is still in force. The rule on recusal ignored, HRA 1989, Universal Declaration on human rights 1948 inter alia, ignored. HHJ Freeland ignored all the evidence against the defendant that was overwhelming including over 80 statements of truth that are self-evident and numerous exhibits that were all ignored by biased HHJ Freeland and other HHJs. As a result of this bias I have claimed since 01/08/2013 that I am a victim of corruption by HHJ Godsmark of Nottingham supported by HHJs Hellman, Freeland, Saggerson, DJ Fine and Freeland whose order is proof of bias, now read on for further proof of bias!

The claimant is well aware that there is the possibility of “conflict of interest” in the Lord/Lady Justices. From the start of this case 3YQ10123 01/08/2013 the knifes were out for J K Browne by the Judiciary, in effect they have changed the essence of the case in so far as the title is concerned, it is now “HHJs Godsmark, Hellman, Freeland, Saggerson and Freeland again and DJ Ruth Fine against J K Browne! I can only hope that the Justices will be impartial enough to insure that the Judiciary involved are held to account for this malfeasance. And this appeal be granted with costs. There is no doubt that the claimant has been subjected to discrimination, intimidation and bullying and since 01/08/2013 the date of the initial claim and no hearing to date has been set down.

J K Browne has suffered from the effects of this hostile environment for over 6 years created by these HHJs, and the 80 unanswered letters and the clearly ignored the indisputable evidence against the defendant. How biased is that?

ALL of my 80 letters to Hellman from 01.08.2013 to date contained a request to transfer the entire matter to Nottingham before a Jury, and this was supported by the defendant’s copy letter enclosed. Due to bias, access to justice is not available to me in the County Court. Nottingham is where all the parties involved including my chief witness HHJ Godsmark are based & domiciled. Re my application to transfer the entire matter logically to Nottingham making common sense in terms of a whole day wasted in London to say nothing of traveling expenses compared with just a few hours in Nottingham where the claimant could attend. However as per usual Mr Browne a litigant in person must be penalised victimised demonised by the afore mentioned Judiciary in every way possible by order of HHJ Godsmark who involves himself in every aspect of every case in which I am involved. His obsession is associated with a psychiatric disorder.

 

It must be remembered that the case was correctly in London at the start of this case, but HHJ Godsmark surreptitiously ordered the matter transferred to Nottingham, contrary to my Claim form request for the matter to be heard in London due to bias in Nottingham, he later in an entirely different case hearing touched on the matter 3YQ10123 that was not listed, when advised of same he swept the entire matter under the carpet to avoid a hearing, the case was clear cut, but Mr Browne must not be allowed to win anything by order of HHJ Godsmark. At this point it begs the question, why is HHJ Godsmark involving himself in every aspect of every case in which Mr Browne is a litigant. He appears to be making the issue “personal”. However it gets worse!

Having failed to see me off, he surreptitiously transfers the entire matter back to London for personal reasons and as such this is not protocol or due process no matter what criteria used, but deliberate bias! What else could it be? This is done again surreptitiously with no reference or advisement to the claimant whatsoever? My objection to the hearing in London is also ignored, due to an unnecessary waste of time and expense. The defendant had the right to have the case heard in Nottingham but was ordered to London by HHJ Godsmark to deprive the claimant of “access to Justice” 1999 and his human rights “HRA 1989” and the Equality Act inter alia, to say nothing of the hate campaign run by HHJ Godsmark since 2003. HHJ Freeland totally ignored the “overriding objective” one of which was that costs be kept to a minimum instead of which HHJ Freeland went for the maximum at the request of the defendant. HHJ Freeland had already proved to be biased against the claimant previously so I expected there will be favour and partiality for the defendant and the outcome assured. In effect a kangaroo court. This proved to be true, see the order of partial HHJ Freeland as he tries to hit Mr.Browne with nearly £4000 costs that are disproportionate to say the least and the claimant is not allowed an assessment to question this injustice. How biased is that? Mr Browne must not be allowed to win anything no matter what! The effort, energy and fortitude that these judges put in to see Mr Browne off is criminal to say the least.

It also must be noted that the court fee of £395 for this claim paid on 01.08.13 was for a hearing that was never set down at any time so the fee was returnable, regardless of numerous requests this fee was misappropriated. DDJ Wrigley under instructions from Godsmark lied from the bench as did Godsmark on a previous occasion. Is there no end to the malfeasance and obsessive nature of HHJ Godsmark as he wreaks personal vengeance on Mr Browne.

At this point the discrimination and the malfeasance of all the Judges involved is indefensible. Namely HHJ Godsmark (the chair and grand master of the Brotherhood) the main instigator of this debacle and hate campaign (hate Act) in order to avenge DJ Reeson, explanation later, DDJ Wrigley, HHJ Dight, HHJ Freeland, HHJ Hellman, DJ Fine, HHJ Saggerson and now HHJ Freeland again. This amounts to a misuse of judicial discretion and misuse of Court power, in effect a judicial conspiracy, defrauding the claimant in order for HHJ Godsmark to pursue his personal and most virulent hate campaign against Mr Browne and using the brotherhood solidarity of which he is the chair and grand master, to oblige other Judges to breach their oath of office to support him! They must ignore the “overriding objectives CPR part 1.2”. These are the facts that are indisputable and the named Judges are fully aware of this but they have their instructions and obligations to HHJ Godsmark as the chairman of the brotherhood and Grand Master.

I now proceed to the chronology of this matter

1) Claim made in Salford County Court money claim centre on 01/08/2013 with instruction for a London hearing, due to discrimination experienced and proved in Nottingham before HHJ Godsmark.

2) Matter transferred to Northampton before DDJ Freeman who duly transfers the case correctly to London

3) London DJ Silverman processes this claim in the normal way for some time until unbelievably

4) HHJ Godsmark Nottingham applies to Silverman London to have the case transferred to Nottingham this was done surreptitiously without reference to the claimant, not protocol. Misuse judicial discretion and court power leaving J K Browne at the mercy of Biased HHJ Godsmark and that was quick in coming. Rights denied!

5) I write letters to Silverman objecting to this transfer as it is not due process! As it denies the claimant of his rights, that are ignored, it appears I am not to get “access to Justice 1999”

6) The matter is now in Nottingham before HHJ Godsmark and there is nothing I can do, on 06/08/14 bias HHJ Godsmark touches on this case 3YQ10123 that was not listed, in an entirely different matter. When advised HHJ Godsmark of this fact he swept the entire matter under the carpet never to be seen again, or so he thought!

7) I reinstate the case 3YQ10123 in a letter to Godsmark and request a hearing of the matter before a JURY to resolve the matter. This letter is ignored as usual. Clearly, I am “persona non grata” before HHJ Godsmark as he is clearly obsessed to the point of paranoia as he pursues this vendetta against the Claimant on behalf DJ Reeson a fellow member of the brotherhood

8) As a result of Godsmark’s intransigence by ignoring the evidence and sweeping it under the carpet and leaving me in limbo I decide to issue a money claim to Salford for the return of the £395 court fee for 3YQ10123 01.08.13 that was never heard or adjudicated on, and no order issued and just swept under the carpet of HHJ Godsmark bench and as such I was at least entitled to a refund.

9) This caused an implausible reaction from the Court as it refuting my claim and issued a devious defence. This resulted in a hearing before DDJ Wrigley who rejected my claim by saying that this had nothing to do with HHJ Godsmark, clearly it had everything to do with Godsmark, clearly DDJ Wrigley as a junior Judge was taking his instructions from Godsmark. During this so called hearing DDJ Wrigley referred to DJ Reeson, unprompted, as a much respected Judge in the Nottingham Brotherhood where HHJ Godsmark is chair and grand-master. The order is an exhibit.

10) This left me with no choice so I made an application to Nottingham to set Wrigley’s order aside with justifiable grounds. Now for the big surprise of all! Unbelievably

11) There is an order from Godsmark transferring the substantive significate case 3YQ10123 dated 01.08.2013 and the setting aside of the order of Wrigley back to London. Godsmark is using his status to divert the matter away from himself by any means at his disposal as the HHJ Godsmark is devoid of conscious, integrity and common decency! This was done surreptitiously as usual! I was never consulted and was presented with a fait accompli as usual. This is not due process it is abuse of the process by a HHJ who is operating a personal vengeance against Mr Browne on behalf of DJ Reeson.

12) Now the matter is incredible back in London and there is nothing I can do except keep fighting for JUSTICE before an honest and impartial Judge if I can find one. What next I ask myself, the matter is now 5 years old and no resolution in sight. On 05/10/2018 HHJ Hellman makes an order that there will be a CCMC arranged before HHJ Freeland after 28 days.

13) On the 22/10/18 a hearing is set down for 2pm 01/02/19 this hearing was cancelled as without merit on the Courts own volition, without any notice to me and my costs were refused. This is a travesty of justice

14) Now I have an order from DJ Fine 09/05/19 stating that the application of the defendant, this is the first time I was made aware of any application, Is this some kind of ambush by a consortium of Judges to deprive the claimant of his rights to a fair trial before an impartial Judge within a reasonable time as per the HRA provisions. This hearing did not take place either. How biased is that?

15) Now the so called solicitor for the defendant issues an application to cancel the substantive significant case 3YQ10123 dated 01/08/2013 that has never been heard or set down for a hearing. Just swept under the carpet in HHJ Godsmark bench. This is quite absurd and there is no justification or evidence for this application is to be ignored or does this man know something I do not, i.e. the biased Judge has decided to advise the defendant that he will find for him regardless (in effect a kangaroo court). The overwhelming evidence and over 80 letters and exhibits including the Claim form dated 01/08/2013 and requests for Judgment will be ignored by order of HHJ Freeland. The Judges ignore the lot as usual!

16) I decide to issue an application refuting this attempt to pervert the course of Justice, ignored as usual. The order confirms that my application was ignored upon receipt. Three copies were sent to the court as required; one sealed copy must be returned to me, this did not happen and my court fee of £255 was misappropriated. So protocol was ignored again to deprive Mr Browne of his rights to be advised of this wrong doing.

The first I knew that the Court had received my application was the order of HHJ Hellman 13/06/2019 and my cheque dated 21/05/2019 for the fee was cashed on 24/05/19. No further communication was received from the Court.

17) I was now aware that an ambush was planned and I was heading to a kangaroo court as per usual. I now issue a further application in order to try and stop this injustice. I requested a transfer of the entire matter to Nottingham before a JURY as I had repeated in every one of my 80 letters since 01/08/2013 all of which were ignored with no explaination. This application dated 26/06/19 fee paid £255 cheque no 133 cashed 29/06/19 had 3 copies as required and one sealed copy was returned to me. My bank statements confirm that my cheques for these fees were cashed.

18) Now I have an order from HHJ Hellman and I quote “Take note that the application (singular) will take place on” 18.10.19. Please note it does not mention which application, was it the defendants only that would have not surprised me, as there were three but the claimant was not advised. How biased is that!

19) I wrote a letter to Hellman asking for clarification as to which application is to be heard on 18/10/19. No reply was received as usual. My assessment of this dereliction of normal behaviour convinced me that I was to be ignored no matter what and a kangaroo court was set for the 18.10.19 so the outcome would be the same whether I attended or not.

20) On the 15/08/19 I received a further order this time from HHJ Saggerson, this order is deliberately vague with intent to deceive “it is ordered that “list all outstanding application(singular)18/10/19” and sealed. What is it possible to deduce from such an order. The list of applications are or should be already on file but the claimant must not be informed. How is that for Bias!

21) Now the court drops in another Judge HHJ Freeland for the second time, who has been shown as biased and partial previously is now selected to see Mr Browne off with summarily assessed costs with no opportunity to challenge, again par for the course. Had the matter been heard in Nottingham the costs would be 26% of the costs awarded. So this is contrary to the provisions of the “Overriding Objective” to keep costs to a minimum inter alia. I have applied to Freeland for permission to appeal and got no reply, no surprise there. I can only hope that this conspiracy is confined to the lower courts and the Lord/Lady Justices are above this kind of stratagem and can be relied on for an impartial adjudication and a subsequent order for same in due course.

22) Before proceeding on to the biased order itself I made the following comment:

Comment: We expect our judges to be Honourable Principled Moral Ethical honest and wise and above all impartial. Their integrity and impartiality are the bedrock of the entire judicial system. We trust them to ensure fair trials and protect the rights of all litigants’. We expect them to peruse the evidence and purely on the evidence to make a fair Judgment. We expect them to respect fundamental basic Human Rights, ECHR, and HRA, Create a level playing field. To treat litigants in person as described in the “Hand Book for litigants in Person co-written by two of the offending judges in this matter. HHJ Hampton & HHJ Peter Bower. I know I am the victim of corrupt judges in the County Court at Nottingham and Central Court at London. I am confident I can prove this to be the case before impartial Justices at the CAC or a Jury at Nottingham. End of comment.

23) I now come to the order of HHJ Freeland who is sitting on an interlocutory application and substituting it for the substantive significant and crucial case number 3YQ10123 dated 01/08/2013 over 6 years old and now diverts it into an interlocutory application by the defendant, at the same time he dismisses my 2 applications at a cost of £510 as if they did not exist. How biased is that! In effect he did the same as HHJ Godsmark did on 06/08/2014 in an effort to see Mr Browne off. How biased is that!

24) Part one of said order states that the defendants bundle was sent on the 11/10/19 this is as maybe however I did not receive this until midday on 17/10/19. Regardless of this I am expected to respond to this false witness in a day or even a couple of days. All ignored by HHJ Freeland.

25) Part two of the order claims that HHJ Saggerson directed that all applications were to be heard on 18/10/2019. I have no hesitation in accusing HHJ Freeland of blatant lying. I have the order of Saggerson to prove it. In effect the plural was not used at any time on any order. How biased is that?

26) HHJ Freeland only reads the defendants bundle and ignored the 80 plus letters sent to Hellman by Fax, email and Royal Mail recording delivery requesting transfer to Nottingham before a Jury due to bias shown by HHJs Godsmark, Hellman, Freeland, Saggerson Fine and again Freeland that included indisputable evidence over a 6 year period including the claim form itself and subsequent requests for Judgement as the defendant did not comply with the due process, all ignored by Salford who has now joined the conspiracy. How is that for bias! Due to this I know it would not have made any difference whether I attended this hearing or not as this was a kangaroo court and the outcome was predictable!.

27) Now it is ordered.

  1. Unbelievable Staples invokes the Human rights act. He deliberately avoids article 6, 7, inter alia that states I am entitled to a trial before an impartial Judge within a reasonable time, it is six years since my claim 01/08/2013 and still not set down for a substantive hearing even yet before a Jury due to discrimination chicanery sophistry and every other devise these Judges can come up with to see Mr Browne off and his money stolen by perverting the course of Justice
  2. The length of time is over 6 years stalled by the Judges not the claimant. But the fact that he claims partiality from HHJ Freeland comes as no surprise. How is that for bias?
  3. This is further proof that my 6 years old claim has never been heard, regardless of the biased current bogus order of HHJ Freeland

28) I now claim bias against all the Judges involved in this 3YQ10123 and HHJ Freeland and the other Judges involved must withdraw themselves, and instigate a Jury trial in Nottingham without any further delay. This is my wish to the Justices of the CAC, the HHJs fear such a hearing as they have used subterfuge chicanery sophistry to avoid same due to the solidarity of the brotherhood. How biased is that!

29) I now come to the exhibits that are indisputable. Case no 3YQ10123

  1. Appellants Notice
  2. Continuing support for appellants notice
  3. Copy of original claim form dated 01/08/2013 for compensation for police brutality, it also contained instructions that the hearing be in London due to bias in Nottingham.
  4. Grounds for making this claim in a comprehensive report on the assault by the police on Mr Browne that involved the illegal use of CS totally unnecessary and uncalled for!
  5. List of 3 police officers involved in this assault. Causing post dramatic stress disorder to Mr Browne. PLUS 8 officers involved in the closing of ranks and the lies they invented. There are photos of my injuries and 2 doctor’s reports. HHJ Freeland was fully aware of all these facts but he decided to ignore the lot. How biased is that?
  6. Request for Judgement (ignored) due to no response of any kind from the defendant to this legitimate official money claim. How biased is that?
  7. There is at least 80 letters to Hellman (transfer to Nottingham before a Jury) all ignored. However I will only submit 3 lots total 7 pages in hard copy printed on both sides, for the environment. The rest will be on disc should the Lord/Lady Justices require the lot. These letters are statements of truth and nothing but the truth so help me! All ignored as if due process does not apply to HM’s Judges. How biased is that? I remind the current 6 HHJs of the Magna Carta principles that everyone is subject to the law even the judiciary and guarantees the rights of individuals the right to justice and the right to a fair trial. Clearly this does not apply to HHJs as they wreak vengeances on Mr Browne
  8. Letter to Hellman seeking clarification ignored as usual no surprise there. I must be kept out of my own case at the behest of Hellman! Ignored, bias
  9. ***Copy of letter from defendant’s agent page 2&1 agreeing that the case be heard in Nottingham. “there is no good reason to take this case to London” he also agrees a jury trial is right “Is a jury in London any more or less biased against the police than one in Nottingham” HHJ Freeland ignores this and all evidence the shows his judgment is bogus.
  10. ***Copy orders a hearing 01/02/2019 that never took place, claimant not informed, no costs awarded. How biased is that?

***Copy order of DJ Fine dated 09/05/19. The application (singular) be listed etc. before a HHJ to be advised. How biased is that?

***Copy order of HHJ Hellman 13/06/2019 listing two applications to be heard together. No hearing set down. Case almost 6 Years old. How biased is that?

***Copy order dated 25/06/2019 “Take notice the application (singular) hearing will take place on 18/10/19. Preceded by letter dated12/07/19 from the court

***Now another HHJ dropped in: Copy order of HHJ Saggerson 15/08/2019 “List all outstanding application (singular) 18/10/2019. What am I to make of this? How is that for bias. See letter asking for clarification

  1. ***Copy of the order of HHJ Freeland 18/10/2019 that is clearly bogus, the subject of this appeal to the CAC. This was the result of over 6 years judicial stalling as no HHJ was prepared to hear this substantive case and this order is discrimination and bias in no uncertain terms in the hope the claimant will give up and let these Judges steal my money. Already costing Mr Browne the claimant over £6345 in fees alone. All stolen by HMCT service. Designed to get the claimant to give up to avoid a hearing of the matter. How biased is that?
  2. Copy of the claimant’s application to dismiss the defendant’s application to set aside the substantive claim 3YQ10123 that is 6 years old and never been set down or heard even now @ a fee of £255. How biased is that?
  3. Copy of the claimant’s application to transfer the entire matter to Nottingham before a Jury @ a fee of £255. This would be the obvious right thing to do in the circumstances. How is that for extreme bias.
  4. This would put the blame where it rightly belongs and Justice would be done by a Jury. The writer knows right from wrong and this order is wrong and HHJ Freeland knows it, but he chooses to lie to protect HHJ Godsmark
  5. Now another group of orders Copy order of DDJ Freeman transferring 3YQ10123 matter to Central London County Court. Copy order of DJ Silverman transferring the matter to Nottingham. Copy order of HHJ Godsmark transferring it back to Central London County Court. How is that for delaying tactics! Pure and simple Bias as this case must never be heard as it involves HHJ Godsmark in Malfeasance and conspiracy. As he has used his status to avoid a hearing and kept my money fee of £395 for 6 years plus. How biased is that?
  6. ***Pages 5/6 of transcript before HHJ Godsmark at non listed matter, and matter swept under the carpet. How biased is that?
  7. Copy of the listings for that day. No listing for 3YQ10123
  8. This is damning no matter what criteria used and is indisputable proof of discrimination (bias) and a complete denial of “Access to Justice” “HRA”, “Equality Act” inter alia! How biased is that!
  9. Letter to Godsmark reinstating 3YQ10123 very dusty from under the carpet where devoid of conscious HHJ Godsmark placed it months previously to avoid a hearing. Ignored as usual. No hearing took place at any time regardless!
  10. This matter 3YQ10123 started as a mere money claim in Salford, then to Northampton DDJ Freeman (copy) then to London before DJ Silverman(copy) then to Nottingham HHJ Godsmark (copy) letter to Silverman objecting to Nottingham transfer ignored as usual, then to DDJ Wrigley (copy)Nottingham. Order by Godsmark transferring the Wrigley matter back to London(copy) then to HHJ Dight(copy) then to Hellman(copy) London then to Freeland(copy) then to DJ Fine(copy) then to Saggerson(copy) then back to Freeland (copy) where his order endeavours to sweeping the entire matter under the carpet official, copying HHJ Godsmark on 06/08/2014. This is due process according to HHJ Godsmark & now by HHJ Freeland, how biased is that
  11. Three orders involved in this debarcle that are bizarre to say the least. Salford to Northampton where DDJ Freeman orders it to London, London DJ Silverman orders it to Nottingham, HHJ Godsmark orders it back to London. All these transfers were done without any reference to the claimant whatsoever. How biased is that?
  12. Letter to Godsmark recovering the 3YQ10123 matter from under the carpet on the floor of Godsmark’s bench where Godsmark swept it on 06/08/2014. His explanation is absurd, the matter was never listed and nobody knows this better than Godsmark, as he continues his vendetta against J K Browne
  13. Letter to London court dated 28/09/2013 ignored again, this is not due process. How is that for bias?
  14. Letter to defendant dated 16/02/2014. Ignored with impunity. No surprise there. All my letters over 6 years are ignored. Justice is not available to me and my human rights are spit on by our esteemed Judiciary!
  15. Letter to defendant16/03/2012
  16. Bias definition

I now require a hearing before 3 Lord/Lady Justices that I will attend regardless of my problem getting there. As this case is over 6 years old there was a lot more statements and exhibits. Should there be any further questions that the CAC would like to ask, they should not hesitate to contract the undersigned. The writer is fully aware that there might be a conflict of interest before the Honourable Lord/Lady Justices and they might not want to hear this case, this been the case would the CAC send back the bundles and importantly my £528 court fee, that is still retained by the CAC, and I will see exactly what I need to do next.

The undersigned is fully aware of the repetitive

nature of this narrative however this is necessary due to the seriousness of the case and the involvement of HHJs of the brotherhood and that means the CAC may have a conflict of interest that their oath of office requires them to ignore as they are duty bound to be impartial. The bundles will be returned to the CAC w/c 06/01/2020. All the above is proved in the 4 authenticated bundles

Signed…………………………………………….05/11/2019

John Kenneth Browne

When responding, please give PAGE NUMBER & Line number.

Please note that this is a very serious matter and involves the honesty and integrity of our Judiciary, as such must be dealt with by the law Lords as they are impartial Justices at the CAC.

I make no apologies for the repetition in this narrative as 10 years is a long time to be fighting for justice in our courts, and it requires constant repetition to get “Access to Justice” and stop the deliberate prevarication that has lasted over 6 years in this case alone.

I now rely on the honesty, integrity and the impartially of our senior Judges in the Civil Appeals Court. Unfortunately the solidarity of the brotherhood may result in malfeasance. In this circumstance what will the Justices decide? May I please have an order from the Justices in order to move this matter forward to a conclusion?

J K Browne

Attached: Four 4 exhibits that proves Judicial Bias and an abuse of the process by the very people who are paid and sworn to uphold.

  1. Transcript of unlisted hearing before HHJ Godsmark, when 3YQ10123 is swept under the carpet in Godsmark’s room never to be seen again and my £395 in effect stolen.
  2. Actual listing for that day. No mention of 3YQ10123
  3. Order of Godsmark in the High Court that registry at CAC want me to appeal to, this is bias itself by the CAC.
  4. List of Judges involved in this debarcle presided over by HHJ Godsmark. In the previous case, a mere money claim, J K Browne is hit with over £100,000 costs by guess who, HHJ Godsmark who is clearly obsessed with vengeance against Mr Browne to the point of paranoid

PLEASE NOTE PRINTED ON BOTH SIDES WHERE APPLICABLE

This case 2019/P1/12356 must be heard at the Justices at the CAC

as HHJ Godsmark the architect of this 6 year old fiasco and travesty of Justice also sits as a High Court Judge at Nottingham who the associates at the CAC advocate should hear this appeal, this is quite irrational as he has shown actual bias, abuse of Judicial discretion, abuse of Court power in effect malfeasance to the claimant J K Browne many times over the past 8 years, in effect there is no alternative to a CAC Justices hearing and the CAC has direct jurisdiction, to claim otherwise is the subvert and pervert due process and a definite attempt to prevaricate this matter as if 6 years is not enough? see transcript attached before HHJ Godsmark that is also in the 4 bundles ignored by the CAC as is a list of Judges involved in another case before Godsmark and the judges involved in this matter already presented to the CAC. Please note HHJ Godsmark involved throughout both cases.

The correct procedure is simple, A DDJ, DJ is accountable to a circuit Judge(HHJ) who is accountable to the CAC, and in certain exceptional cases to the High Court that was not involved in the case at any time due to the potential of bias. The CAC/High Court are accountable to the Supreme Court. Primarily all are accountable to their oath of office, their impartiality is imperative as the bedrock of our legal system. Litigants must be able to trust our Judges. Unfortunately the Judges involved in this case have cast all this aside in favour of solidarity with the brotherhood. The HHJs have handed down the case to a DJ Fine. In effect they must be impeached. Otherwise they are a law onto themselves and can no longer be trusted.

Proof: If that is not enough proof of bias there is more, this case started in London, HHJ Godsmark ordered it via DJ Silverman to Nottingham where Godsmark buried it never to be seen again or so he thought! I revived this from under the carpet in Godsmark’s private room in June 2017, see reviving letter, again ignored! Godsmark is devoid of conscious! As a result when this failed he ordered it back to London where it was stalled for a further 3 years. How blatantly biased is that. However if that is not enough proof I now provide further evidence of dishonesty and fraud by Godsmark. On 27th June before Godsmark in his capacity as a High Court Judge the case against me was dismissed and I was awarded costs to be assessed if not agreed. I duly made application for same to SCCO only to be told that this application had been transferred to Nottingham for assessment in order that Godsmark could sit in Judgement on himself, when it got to Nottingham it was again buried under the carpet never to be seen again, such arrogance, I had paid £369 court fee for this assessment that was not refunded regardless of my money claim to Salford for same! This money is still outstanding 5 years later! How biased is that? Copy order enclosed. I now have to conclude that the CAC has joined this conspiracy to deny “access to Justice and Human rights to the claimant J K Browne.

Please confirm that this is not true!!?? Now the CAC sends my 4 bundles back with no order and no transfer order this is a clear attempt to continue the prevarication of HHJs Godsmark, Freeland, Hellman, Saggerson, DJ Fine and Freeland for the second time when he dismisses case no 3YQ10123 dated 01/08/2013 with a wave of his hand and 2 applications from the claimant, my application for a transcript of same is ignored, how biased is that?

These 4 bundles 2019/P1/12356 well within the time limit 18/11/2019, the delay is caused by the CAC as it endeavours to avoid a hearing by very devious means as this is an open and shut case. The bundles will now be returned to the CAC for an adjudication and a CAC order before 3 Lord/Lady Justices in January 2020 to be set down ASAP, the fee of £528 already paid and cashed has not been refunded as at 06/01/2020 over 6 weeks later. Does the CAC intend to misappropriate this money. The CAC must retain the £528 and be used for it’s original purpose to pay for the adjudication hearing and order 2019/P1/12356, this is my inalienable right to “access to Justice” not able to be given or taken away because of being protected by statue, to be set down asap in January 2020.

Attachment: Continuing support for Appellant Notice no 2019/P1/12356.

Appeal to the Civil Appeals Court already submitted number 2019/P1/12356 dated 05/11/2019 against order of HHJ Freeland 18/10.2019 in relation to County Court case no 3YQ10123 dated 01/08/2013, stalled for over 6 years by HHJs Nigel Godsmark (ring leader and chair of the brotherhood and Grand master) Simon Freeland, Stephen Hellman, Alan Saggerson, DJ Ruth Fine and GGH Simon Freeman (for the second time) this is not protocol or due process and an abuse of the process, abuse of judicial discretion and abuse of Court power! Such arrogance is unbelievable! It is not possible to trust them to be impartial! In effect they are dishonest and devoid of conscious, is his endemic?

All of the order of HHJ Simon Freeland (enclosed) be rescinded forthwith, as it is not due process and is an abuse of the process discretion and Court power. As, it is based entirely on discrimination (bias) against the claimant!

Equality Act 2010 violations The Equality Act became law in 2010. It covers everyone in Britain and protects people from discrimination, harassment and victimisation.

Human Rights Act violations, In the determining the civil rights of the claimant in this case the Judges failed to take account of article 6 of the HRA. Everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time, over 6 years is not reasonable no matter what criteria used!

Overriding Objective The overriding objective expressly says that the court has to seek to give effect to it when exercising any powers given by the rules or interpreting any rules. But in every other case, whether using its powers or deciding what the rules mean, the court has to take account of the overriding objective.

Access to Justice 1999 violations: Access to justice is a right not a privilege and as such cannot be interpreted to mean anything else. In that regard it will play an important part in helping to maintain the courts commitment to access to Justice as a right available to all. Lord Dyson Master ot the rolls 11th December 2012. This enables people to exercise their rights, challenge discrimination or hold decision-makers to account..

These Acts of Parliament are ignored by HHJs Simon Freeland, Nigel Graham Godsmark who also sits as a High Court Judge, Stephen Godfrey Hellman, Alan Saggerson, & DJ Ruth Fine and I now appeal to the CAC to adjudicate on this entire matter.

HHJ Freeland and others ignore the evidence of 6 years prevaricating to avoid hearing this open and shut case that included over 80 letters each one requesting a transfer to Nottingham before a JURY and got no reply. My rights are spit on and my money claim to Salford for the refund of the fee £395 received no response, went to a hearing before DDJ Wrigley who negated my claim, and awarded costs. I made application to set aside same only to find that High Court Judge Godsmark now transfers this case and 3YQ10123 back to London with no explanation, needless to say the Wrigley order was upheld by HHJ Dight. No surprise there. The 3YQ10123 was stalled again until 18/10/2019 when HHJ Freeland presided over a kangaroo court where the application of the defendant is given priority and favour, and the claimants application to dismiss the defendants dishonest application ignored and dismissed as usual. And the claimant’s second application to transfer the 3YQ10123 matter to Nottingham before a JURY is dismissed ignored and my fee money £395 stolen by HHJ Freeland, who’s order is riddled with bias in every line and every word and nobody is more aware of this than HHJ Freeland himself. The rule of law is ignored, all equal before the law is ignored, as is the Magna Carta that is still in force. The rule on recusal ignored, HRA 1989, Universal Declaration on human rights 1948 inter alia, ignored. HHJ Freeland ignored all the evidence against the defendant that was overwhelming including over 80 statements of truth that are self-evident and numerous exhibits that were all ignored by biased HHJ Freeland and other HHJs. As a result of this bias I have claimed since 01/08/2013 that I am a victim of corruption by HHJ Godsmark of Nottingham supported by HHJs Hellman, Freeland, Saggerson, DJ Fine and Freeland whose order is proof of bias, now read on for further proof of bias!

The claimant is well aware that there is the possibility of “conflict of interest” in the Lord/Lady Justices. From the start of this case 3YQ10123 01/08/2013 the knifes were out for J K Browne by the Judiciary, in effect they have changed the essence of the case in so far as the title is concerned, it is now “HHJs Godsmark, Hellman, Freeland, Saggerson and Freeland again and DJ Ruth Fine against J K Browne! I can only hope that the Justices will be impartial enough to insure that the Judiciary involved are held to account for this malfeasance. And this appeal be granted with costs. There is no doubt that the claimant has been subjected to discrimination, intimidation and bullying and since 01/08/2013 the date of the initial claim and no hearing to date has been set down.

J K Browne has suffered from the effects of this hostile environment for over 6 years created by these HHJs, and the 80 unanswered letters and the clearly ignored the indisputable evidence against the defendant. How biased is that?

ALL of my 80 letters to Hellman from 01.08.2013 to date contained a request to transfer the entire matter to Nottingham before a Jury, and this was supported by the defendant’s copy letter enclosed. Due to bias, access to justice is not available to me in the County Court. Nottingham is where all the parties involved including my chief witness HHJ Godsmark are based & domiciled. Re my application to transfer the entire matter logically to Nottingham making common sense in terms of a whole day wasted in London to say nothing of traveling expenses compared with just a few hours in Nottingham where the claimant could attend. However as per usual Mr Browne a litigant in person must be penalised victimised demonised by the afore mentioned Judiciary in every way possible by order of HHJ Godsmark who involves himself in every aspect of every case in which I am involved. His obsession is associated with a psychiatric disorder.

 

It must be remembered that the case was correctly in London at the start of this case, but HHJ Godsmark surreptitiously ordered the matter transferred to Nottingham, contrary to my Claim form request for the matter to be heard in London due to bias in Nottingham, he later in an entirely different case hearing touched on the matter 3YQ10123 that was not listed, when advised of same he swept the entire matter under the carpet to avoid a hearing, the case was clear cut, but Mr Browne must not be allowed to win anything by order of HHJ Godsmark. At this point it begs the question, why is HHJ Godsmark involving himself in every aspect of every case in which Mr Browne is a litigant. He appears to be making the issue “personal”. However it gets worse!

Having failed to see me off, he surreptitiously transfers the entire matter back to London for personal reasons and as such this is not protocol or due process no matter what criteria used, but deliberate bias! What else could it be? This is done again surreptitiously with no reference or advisement to the claimant whatsoever? My objection to the hearing in London is also ignored, due to an unnecessary waste of time and expense. The defendant had the right to have the case heard in Nottingham but was ordered to London by HHJ Godsmark to deprive the claimant of “access to Justice” 1999 and his human rights “HRA 1989” and the Equality Act inter alia, to say nothing of the hate campaign run by HHJ Godsmark since 2003. HHJ Freeland totally ignored the “overriding objective” one of which was that costs be kept to a minimum instead of which HHJ Freeland went for the maximum at the request of the defendant. HHJ Freeland had already proved to be biased against the claimant previously so I expected there will be favour and partiality for the defendant and the outcome assured. In effect a kangaroo court. This proved to be true, see the order of partial HHJ Freeland as he tries to hit Mr.Browne with nearly £4000 costs that are disproportionate to say the least and the claimant is not allowed an assessment to question this injustice. How biased is that? Mr Browne must not be allowed to win anything no matter what! The effort, energy and fortitude that these judges put in to see Mr Browne off is criminal to say the least.

It also must be noted that the court fee of £395 for this claim paid on 01.08.13 was for a hearing that was never set down at any time so the fee was returnable, regardless of numerous requests this fee was misappropriated. DDJ Wrigley under instructions from Godsmark lied from the bench as did Godsmark on a previous occasion. Is there no end to the malfeasance and obsessive nature of HHJ Godsmark as he wreaks personal vengeance on Mr Browne.

At this point the discrimination and the malfeasance of all the Judges involved is indefensible. Namely HHJ Godsmark (the chair and grand master of the Brotherhood) the main instigator of this debacle and hate campaign (hate Act) in order to avenge DJ Reeson, explanation later, DDJ Wrigley, HHJ Dight, HHJ Freeland, HHJ Hellman, DJ Fine, HHJ Saggerson and now HHJ Freeland again. This amounts to a misuse of judicial discretion and misuse of Court power, in effect a judicial conspiracy, defrauding the claimant in order for HHJ Godsmark to pursue his personal and most virulent hate campaign against Mr Browne and using the brotherhood solidarity of which he is the chair and grand master, to oblige other Judges to breach their oath of office to support him! They must ignore the “overriding objectives CPR part 1.2”. These are the facts that are indisputable and the named Judges are fully aware of this but they have their instructions and obligations to HHJ Godsmark as the chairman of the brotherhood and Grand Master.

I now proceed to the chronology of this matter

1) Claim made in Salford County Court money claim centre on 01/08/2013 with instruction for a London hearing, due to discrimination experienced and proved in Nottingham before HHJ Godsmark.

2) Matter transferred to Northampton before DDJ Freeman who duly transfers the case correctly to London

3) London DJ Silverman processes this claim in the normal way for some time until unbelievably

4) HHJ Godsmark Nottingham applies to Silverman London to have the case transferred to Nottingham this was done surreptitiously without reference to the claimant, not protocol. Misuse judicial discretion and court power leaving J K Browne at the mercy of Biased HHJ Godsmark and that was quick in coming. Rights denied!

5) I write letters to Silverman objecting to this transfer as it is not due process! As it denies the claimant of his rights, that are ignored, it appears I am not to get “access to Justice 1999”

6) The matter is now in Nottingham before HHJ Godsmark and there is nothing I can do, on 06/08/14 bias HHJ Godsmark touches on this case 3YQ10123 that was not listed, in an entirely different matter. When advised HHJ Godsmark of this fact he swept the entire matter under the carpet never to be seen again, or so he thought!

7) I reinstate the case 3YQ10123 in a letter to Godsmark and request a hearing of the matter before a JURY to resolve the matter. This letter is ignored as usual. Clearly, I am “persona non grata” before HHJ Godsmark as he is clearly obsessed to the point of paranoia as he pursues this vendetta against the Claimant on behalf DJ Reeson a fellow member of the brotherhood

8) As a result of Godsmark’s intransigence by ignoring the evidence and sweeping it under the carpet and leaving me in limbo I decide to issue a money claim to Salford for the return of the £395 court fee for 3YQ10123 01.08.13 that was never heard or adjudicated on, and no order issued and just swept under the carpet of HHJ Godsmark bench and as such I was at least entitled to a refund.

9) This caused an implausible reaction from the Court as it refuting my claim and issued a devious defence. This resulted in a hearing before DDJ Wrigley who rejected my claim by saying that this had nothing to do with HHJ Godsmark, clearly it had everything to do with Godsmark, clearly DDJ Wrigley as a junior Judge was taking his instructions from Godsmark. During this so called hearing DDJ Wrigley referred to DJ Reeson, unprompted, as a much respected Judge in the Nottingham Brotherhood where HHJ Godsmark is chair and grand-master. The order is an exhibit.

10) This left me with no choice so I made an application to Nottingham to set Wrigley’s order aside with justifiable grounds. Now for the big surprise of all! Unbelievably

11) There is an order from Godsmark transferring the substantive significate case 3YQ10123 dated 01.08.2013 and the setting aside of the order of Wrigley back to London. Godsmark is using his status to divert the matter away from himself by any means at his disposal as the HHJ Godsmark is devoid of conscious, integrity and common decency! This was done surreptitiously as usual! I was never consulted and was presented with a fait accompli as usual. This is not due process it is abuse of the process by a HHJ who is operating a personal vengeance against Mr Browne on behalf of DJ Reeson.

12) Now the matter is incredible back in London and there is nothing I can do except keep fighting for JUSTICE before an honest and impartial Judge if I can find one. What next I ask myself, the matter is now 5 years old and no resolution in sight. On 05/10/2018 HHJ Hellman makes an order that there will be a CCMC arranged before HHJ Freeland after 28 days.

13) On the 22/10/18 a hearing is set down for 2pm 01/02/19 this hearing was cancelled as without merit on the Courts own volition, without any notice to me and my costs were refused. This is a travesty of justice

14) Now I have an order from DJ Fine 09/05/19 stating that the application of the defendant, this is the first time I was made aware of any application, Is this some kind of ambush by a consortium of Judges to deprive the claimant of his rights to a fair trial before an impartial Judge within a reasonable time as per the HRA provisions. This hearing did not take place either. How biased is that?

15) Now the so called solicitor for the defendant issues an application to cancel the substantive significant case 3YQ10123 dated 01/08/2013 that has never been heard or set down for a hearing. Just swept under the carpet in HHJ Godsmark bench. This is quite absurd and there is no justification or evidence for this application is to be ignored or does this man know something I do not, i.e. the biased Judge has decided to advise the defendant that he will find for him regardless (in effect a kangaroo court). The overwhelming evidence and over 80 letters and exhibits including the Claim form dated 01/08/2013 and requests for Judgment will be ignored by order of HHJ Freeland. The Judges ignore the lot as usual!

16) I decide to issue an application refuting this attempt to pervert the course of Justice, ignored as usual. The order confirms that my application was ignored upon receipt. Three copies were sent to the court as required; one sealed copy must be returned to me, this did not happen and my court fee of £255 was misappropriated. So protocol was ignored again to deprive Mr Browne of his rights to be advised of this wrong doing.

The first I knew that the Court had received my application was the order of HHJ Hellman 13/06/2019 and my cheque dated 21/05/2019 for the fee was cashed on 24/05/19. No further communication was received from the Court.

17) I was now aware that an ambush was planned and I was heading to a kangaroo court as per usual. I now issue a further application in order to try and stop this injustice. I requested a transfer of the entire matter to Nottingham before a JURY as I had repeated in every one of my 80 letters since 01/08/2013 all of which were ignored with no explaination. This application dated 26/06/19 fee paid £255 cheque no 133 cashed 29/06/19 had 3 copies as required and one sealed copy was returned to me. My bank statements confirm that my cheques for these fees were cashed.

18) Now I have an order from HHJ Hellman and I quote “Take note that the application (singular) will take place on” 18.10.19. Please note it does not mention which application, was it the defendants only that would have not surprised me, as there were three but the claimant was not advised. How biased is that!

19) I wrote a letter to Hellman asking for clarification as to which application is to be heard on 18/10/19. No reply was received as usual. My assessment of this dereliction of normal behaviour convinced me that I was to be ignored no matter what and a kangaroo court was set for the 18.10.19 so the outcome would be the same whether I attended or not.

20) On the 15/08/19 I received a further order this time from HHJ Saggerson, this order is deliberately vague with intent to deceive “it is ordered that “list all outstanding application(singular)18/10/19” and sealed. What is it possible to deduce from such an order. The list of applications are or should be already on file but the claimant must not be informed. How is that for Bias!

21) Now the court drops in another Judge HHJ Freeland for the second time, who has been shown as biased and partial previously is now selected to see Mr Browne off with summarily assessed costs with no opportunity to challenge, again par for the course. Had the matter been heard in Nottingham the costs would be 26% of the costs awarded. So this is contrary to the provisions of the “Overriding Objective” to keep costs to a minimum inter alia. I have applied to Freeland for permission to appeal and got no reply, no surprise there. I can only hope that this conspiracy is confined to the lower courts and the Lord/Lady Justices are above this kind of stratagem and can be relied on for an impartial adjudication and a subsequent order for same in due course.

22) Before proceeding on to the biased order itself I made the following comment:

Comment: We expect our judges to be Honourable Principled Moral Ethical honest and wise and above all impartial. Their integrity and impartiality are the bedrock of the entire judicial system. We trust them to ensure fair trials and protect the rights of all litigants’. We expect them to peruse the evidence and purely on the evidence to make a fair Judgment. We expect them to respect fundamental basic Human Rights, ECHR, and HRA, Create a level playing field. To treat litigants in person as described in the “Hand Book for litigants in Person co-written by two of the offending judges in this matter. HHJ Hampton & HHJ Peter Bower. I know I am the victim of corrupt judges in the County Court at Nottingham and Central Court at London. I am confident I can prove this to be the case before impartial Justices at the CAC or a Jury at Nottingham. End of comment.

23) I now come to the order of HHJ Freeland who is sitting on an interlocutory application and substituting it for the substantive significant and crucial case number 3YQ10123 dated 01/08/2013 over 6 years old and now diverts it into an interlocutory application by the defendant, at the same time he dismisses my 2 applications at a cost of £510 as if they did not exist. How biased is that! In effect he did the same as HHJ Godsmark did on 06/08/2014 in an effort to see Mr Browne off. How biased is that!

24) Part one of said order states that the defendants bundle was sent on the 11/10/19 this is as maybe however I did not receive this until midday on 17/10/19. Regardless of this I am expected to respond to this false witness in a day or even a couple of days. All ignored by HHJ Freeland.

25) Part two of the order claims that HHJ Saggerson directed that all applications were to be heard on 18/10/2019. I have no hesitation in accusing HHJ Freeland of blatant lying. I have the order of Saggerson to prove it. In effect the plural was not used at any time on any order. How biased is that?

26) HHJ Freeland only reads the defendants bundle and ignored the 80 plus letters sent to Hellman by Fax, email and Royal Mail recording delivery requesting transfer to Nottingham before a Jury due to bias shown by HHJs Godsmark, Hellman, Freeland, Saggerson Fine and again Freeland that included indisputable evidence over a 6 year period including the claim form itself and subsequent requests for Judgement as the defendant did not comply with the due process, all ignored by Salford who has now joined the conspiracy. How is that for bias! Due to this I know it would not have made any difference whether I attended this hearing or not as this was a kangaroo court and the outcome was predictable!.

27) Now it is ordered.

  1. Unbelievable Staples invokes the Human rights act. He deliberately avoids article 6, 7, inter alia that states I am entitled to a trial before an impartial Judge within a reasonable time, it is six years since my claim 01/08/2013 and still not set down for a substantive hearing even yet before a Jury due to discrimination chicanery sophistry and every other devise these Judges can come up with to see Mr Browne off and his money stolen by perverting the course of Justice
  2. The length of time is over 6 years stalled by the Judges not the claimant. But the fact that he claims partiality from HHJ Freeland comes as no surprise. How is that for bias?
  3. This is further proof that my 6 years old claim has never been heard, regardless of the biased current bogus order of HHJ Freeland

28) I now claim bias against all the Judges involved in this 3YQ10123 and HHJ Freeland and the other Judges involved must withdraw themselves, and instigate a Jury trial in Nottingham without any further delay. This is my wish to the Justices of the CAC, the HHJs fear such a hearing as they have used subterfuge chicanery sophistry to avoid same due to the solidarity of the brotherhood. How biased is that!

29) I now come to the exhibits that are indisputable. Case no 3YQ10123

  1. Appellants Notice
  2. Continuing support for appellants notice
  3. Copy of original claim form dated 01/08/2013 for compensation for police brutality, it also contained instructions that the hearing be in London due to bias in Nottingham.
  4. Grounds for making this claim in a comprehensive report on the assault by the police on Mr Browne that involved the illegal use of CS totally unnecessary and uncalled for!
  5. List of 3 police officers involved in this assault. Causing post dramatic stress disorder to Mr Browne. PLUS 8 officers involved in the closing of ranks and the lies they invented. There are photos of my injuries and 2 doctor’s reports. HHJ Freeland was fully aware of all these facts but he decided to ignore the lot. How biased is that?
  6. Request for Judgement (ignored) due to no response of any kind from the defendant to this legitimate official money claim. How biased is that?
  7. There is at least 80 letters to Hellman (transfer to Nottingham before a Jury) all ignored. However I will only submit 3 lots total 7 pages in hard copy printed on both sides, for the environment. The rest will be on disc should the Lord/Lady Justices require the lot. These letters are statements of truth and nothing but the truth so help me! All ignored as if due process does not apply to HM’s Judges. How biased is that? I remind the current 6 HHJs of the Magna Carta principles that everyone is subject to the law even the judiciary and guarantees the rights of individuals the right to justice and the right to a fair trial. Clearly this does not apply to HHJs as they wreak vengeances on Mr Browne
  8. Letter to Hellman seeking clarification ignored as usual no surprise there. I must be kept out of my own case at the behest of Hellman! Ignored, bias
  9. ***Copy of letter from defendant’s agent page 2&1 agreeing that the case be heard in Nottingham. “there is no good reason to take this case to London” he also agrees a jury trial is right “Is a jury in London any more or less biased against the police than one in Nottingham” HHJ Freeland ignores this and all evidence the shows his judgment is bogus.
  10. ***Copy orders a hearing 01/02/2019 that never took place, claimant not informed, no costs awarded. How biased is that?

***Copy order of DJ Fine dated 09/05/19. The application (singular) be listed etc. before a HHJ to be advised. How biased is that?

***Copy order of HHJ Hellman 13/06/2019 listing two applications to be heard together. No hearing set down. Case almost 6 Years old. How biased is that?

***Copy order dated 25/06/2019 “Take notice the application (singular) hearing will take place on 18/10/19. Preceded by letter dated12/07/19 from the court

***Now another HHJ dropped in: Copy order of HHJ Saggerson 15/08/2019 “List all outstanding application (singular) 18/10/2019. What am I to make of this? How is that for bias. See letter asking for clarification

  1. ***Copy of the order of HHJ Freeland 18/10/2019 that is clearly bogus, the subject of this appeal to the CAC. This was the result of over 6 years judicial stalling as no HHJ was prepared to hear this substantive case and this order is discrimination and bias in no uncertain terms in the hope the claimant will give up and let these Judges steal my money. Already costing Mr Browne the claimant over £6345 in fees alone. All stolen by HMCT service. Designed to get the claimant to give up to avoid a hearing of the matter. How biased is that?
  2. Copy of the claimant’s application to dismiss the defendant’s application to set aside the substantive claim 3YQ10123 that is 6 years old and never been set down or heard even now @ a fee of £255. How biased is that?
  3. Copy of the claimant’s application to transfer the entire matter to Nottingham before a Jury @ a fee of £255. This would be the obvious right thing to do in the circumstances. How is that for extreme bias.
  4. This would put the blame where it rightly belongs and Justice would be done by a Jury. The writer knows right from wrong and this order is wrong and HHJ Freeland knows it, but he chooses to lie to protect HHJ Godsmark
  5. Now another group of orders Copy order of DDJ Freeman transferring 3YQ10123 matter to Central London County Court. Copy order of DJ Silverman transferring the matter to Nottingham. Copy order of HHJ Godsmark transferring it back to Central London County Court. How is that for delaying tactics! Pure and simple Bias as this case must never be heard as it involves HHJ Godsmark in Malfeasance and conspiracy. As he has used his status to avoid a hearing and kept my money fee of £395 for 6 years plus. How biased is that?
  6. ***Pages 5/6 of transcript before HHJ Godsmark at non listed matter, and matter swept under the carpet. How biased is that?
  7. Copy of the listings for that day. No listing for 3YQ10123
  8. This is damning no matter what criteria used and is indisputable proof of discrimination (bias) and a complete denial of “Access to Justice” “HRA”, “Equality Act” inter alia! How biased is that!
  9. Letter to Godsmark reinstating 3YQ10123 very dusty from under the carpet where devoid of conscious HHJ Godsmark placed it months previously to avoid a hearing. Ignored as usual. No hearing took place at any time regardless!
  10. This matter 3YQ10123 started as a mere money claim in Salford, then to Northampton DDJ Freeman (copy) then to London before DJ Silverman(copy) then to Nottingham HHJ Godsmark (copy) letter to Silverman objecting to Nottingham transfer ignored as usual, then to DDJ Wrigley (copy)Nottingham. Order by Godsmark transferring the Wrigley matter back to London(copy) then to HHJ Dight(copy) then to Hellman(copy) London then to Freeland(copy) then to DJ Fine(copy) then to Saggerson(copy) then back to Freeland (copy) where his order endeavours to sweeping the entire matter under the carpet official, copying HHJ Godsmark on 06/08/2014. This is due process according to HHJ Godsmark & now by HHJ Freeland, how biased is that
  11. Three orders involved in this debarcle that are bizarre to say the least. Salford to Northampton where DDJ Freeman orders it to London, London DJ Silverman orders it to Nottingham, HHJ Godsmark orders it back to London. All these transfers were done without any reference to the claimant whatsoever. How biased is that?
  12. Letter to Godsmark recovering the 3YQ10123 matter from under the carpet on the floor of Godsmark’s bench where Godsmark swept it on 06/08/2014. His explanation is absurd, the matter was never listed and nobody knows this better than Godsmark, as he continues his vendetta against J K Browne
  13. Letter to London court dated 28/09/2013 ignored again, this is not due process. How is that for bias?
  14. Letter to defendant dated 16/02/2014. Ignored with impunity. No surprise there. All my letters over 6 years are ignored. Justice is not available to me and my human rights are spit on by our esteemed Judiciary!
  15. Letter to defendant16/03/2012
  16. Bias definition

I now require a hearing before 3 Lord/Lady Justices that I will attend regardless of my problem getting there. As this case is over 6 years old there was a lot more statements and exhibits. Should there be any further questions that the CAC would like to ask, they should not hesitate to contract the undersigned. The writer is fully aware that there might be a conflict of interest before the Honourable Lord/Lady Justices and they might not want to hear this case, this been the case would the CAC send back the bundles and importantly my £528 court fee, that is still retained by the CAC, and I will see exactly what I need to do next.

The undersigned is fully aware of the repetitive

nature of this narrative however this is necessary due to the seriousness of the case and the involvement of HHJs of the brotherhood and that means the CAC may have a conflict of interest that their oath of office requires them to ignore as they are duty bound to be impartial. The bundles will be returned to the CAC w/c 06/01/2020. All the above is proved in the 4 authenticated bundles

Signed…………………………………………….05/11/2019

John Kenneth Browne

When responding, please give PAGE NUMBER & Line number.

Please note that this is a very serious matter and involves the honesty and integrity of our Judiciary, as such must be dealt with by the law Lords as they are impartial Justices at the CAC.

I make no apologies for the repetition in this narrative as 10 years is a long time to be fighting for justice in our courts, and it requires constant repetition to get “Access to Justice” and stop the deliberate prevarication that has lasted over 6 years in this case alone.

I now rely on the honesty, integrity and the impartially of our senior Judges in the Civil Appeals Court. Unfortunately the solidarity of the brotherhood may result in malfeasance. In this circumstance what will the Justices decide? May I please have an order from the Justices in order to move this matter forward to a conclusion?

J K Browne

Attached: Four 4 exhibits that proves Judicial Bias and an abuse of the process by the very people who are paid and sworn to uphold.

  1. Transcript of unlisted hearing before HHJ Godsmark, when 3YQ10123 is swept under the carpet in Godsmark’s room never to be seen again and my £395 in effect stolen.
  2. Actual listing for that day. No mention of 3YQ10123
  3. Order of Godsmark in the High Court that registry at CAC want me to appeal to, this is bias itself by the CAC.
  4. List of Judges involved in this debarcle presided over by HHJ Godsmark. In the previous case, a mere money claim, J K Browne is hit with over £100,000 costs by guess who, HHJ Godsmark who is clearly obsessed with vengeance against Mr Browne to the point of paranoid

 

1 Comment on "COUNTY COURT"

  1. Well I really liked reading it. This information procured by you is very useful for correct planning.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.


*